The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 19, 2001, 12:56 AM   #1
Blue Duck357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2000
Posts: 1,460
About that 2.3 average rounds per gunfight...

I heard on another thread that this DOJ statistic is invalid because it takes suicides into account when tabulating the data. Because so many people kill themselves with one shot to the head it really warps the numbers, and that the real number of rounds may be 6 or greater.

Anyone know if this is true or not?
Blue Duck357 is offline  
Old July 19, 2001, 01:02 AM   #2
justinr1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2001
Location: Northern Alabama
Posts: 365
All I know is that I better get it done in 6. I think you have to take into account the stats on civilians vs. LEO for a better understanding.

justinr1
justinr1 is offline  
Old July 19, 2001, 01:27 AM   #3
David Scott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
My Ruger P95 holds 15+1, the spare mag another 15. What's your point?
David Scott is offline  
Old July 19, 2001, 01:41 AM   #4
PreserveFreedom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I never considered that but it makes a good point. Kind of like all of those 25 year old children that are shot while raping a woman as they attempt to steal the jewelry from her home to support their cocaine habits.
 
Old July 19, 2001, 02:07 AM   #5
blades67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 1999
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA
Posts: 6,014
Remember, there are lies, damn lies and statistics.
blades67 is offline  
Old July 19, 2001, 04:27 AM   #6
croyance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2001
Posts: 3,604
I believe that in real firefights there is a tendancy to empty the first magazine. So back when everybody was carrying a revolver, the average was 5-6 rounds.

Now that there are so many semi-autos, the average is higher, I think in excess of 10 rounds. Of course some still carry revolvers, that 1911 and some compact carry guns have less than 10 rounds, and yet others have the presence of mind to control their fire better (the benefit of the more advanced training availible now, I guess). I think these combine to keep the average just about 10 rounds.

don't have a link, but I know I read them somewhere. Those are FBI stats, if I recall correctly.

I have been told by one who knows that when you run dry, realize it, and reload that you finally think. So people do things like run and surrender. Getting my scrawny butt out of Dodge sounds good, if its not my home and I can do it safely.
croyance is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 05:09 AM   #7
1031
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2001
Location: SW USA
Posts: 163
As I said in another thread, I read it in an issue of Guns & Weapons For Law Enforcement a couple months ago. You guys can look it up if you have old issues. It was in the front of the magazine, like the editors page, just a one page article in the very front of the mag.
As stated, it says that the 2.3 rounds per fight is a wrong statistic because that is the "average number of rounds per incident" which includes one-shot suicides (which obviously beings the average way down). The real number, according to this article, is somewhere between 9-13 rounds per fight if I recall correctly. Studies are ongoing to find the real number. I am told that the FBI has been researching it and came out recently with the number around "12". I don't know (and apparently neither does anyone else right now) what the exact number is, but it is a hell of a lot more than 3 and best estimates from data so far is probably at least 10.
You can look at police shootings yourself, look at all of them you can in newpapers for months and you will see very quickly that there are a lot of rounds fired on average.
Yes yes, "we are better shooters than the Police", but lets not be arrogant Rambos here. Are we so sure that when we are being shot at that we are going to be Joe Cool and not at least blaze off a few rounds at a time? Maybe even (gasp!) miss a couple times against a moving target that is shooting back? Who knows, some of our shots might just not hit center mass, but limbs etc? 10 rounds adds up real quick when you are crapping-your-pants scared, getting shot at, shooting at a moving target while you dodge bullets, possibly miss, possibly make hits on limbs etc. There are a lot of variables that don't always add up to perfect COM hits with every bullet.

I have heard time and time and time again from people that have been in real scary shootings, that you will be so scared for your life that you will probably empty your magazine, whatever it holds, and you will swear you only fired a couple shots! The tendency for people to empty their first mag leads me to always carry a second. You may not realize how much you are shooting until that mag runs dry and you have to change it. I try to always carry a reload because I realize I am human and under fear I may just empty my mag. I happens to many many people, and it would be arrogant for me not to think it could happen to me.
1031 is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 06:23 AM   #8
scoops
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2000
Posts: 414
thats why i dont carry an extra mag or bullits.whats the point.you will never get to the point of reloading in a (SELF DEFENSIVE)SITUATION..
scoops is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 07:16 AM   #9
STEVE M
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 1999
Location: TN. USA
Posts: 607
Does anyone have a source for civilian shootings? The dynamics are totally different than police shootings. I would think there round count would be higher per incident than civilians. They are required to stop/arrest the suspect (we stop or disingage), they often have backup who are also shooting (this would double the rounds fired), Often they engage from farther away (at least at the start, which would also raise the count).
I think the numbers are interesting, but unless the LE and civilian shootings are seperated, they meaningless.
STEVE M is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 08:01 AM   #10
Blue Duck357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2000
Posts: 1,460
Thanks 1031, must have been your post I read the info in. Remmebred it, but not which thread I had heard it in.
Blue Duck357 is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 08:23 AM   #11
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,793
Some suicides take more than one shot to cause death. Also, some people who commit suicide will fire a test shot. The shrinks say that the test shots are fired for a variety of reasons such as to make sure the gun works, to get accustomed to the noise (I know, stupid, but apparently it happens), and as a means to verify that they can actually pull the trigger.

So the information is ancillary. Two shot suicides would also skew the stats considerably as well.

For the DOJ stats, is total 2.3 rounds the number fired in the fight by both parties, the average number fired between the two parties, or the number of shots fired before a hit?

Smith at Thunder Ranch gave us some 1980s and 1990s information, but not a source for it. Supposedly, in the 1980s, police fired 2.8 shots on average before making their first hit on the suspect and 5.7 shots for the engagement. In other words, they usually emptied their revolver. In the 1990s, 12.9 shots before first hit and 17.5 shots fired in the engagement, once again, emptying the magazine. The differences in the stats is due, in part, to having high capacity mags in the 1990s.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 08:28 AM   #12
buzz_knox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
Scoops, I hope you never have a weapon fail on you. Many malfunctions are tied to magazine failures and most clearance drills I'm familiar with include dumping the mag as a corrective action.

Not carrying a spare magazine is like not having a spare tire. You never need it until you REALLY need it.
buzz_knox is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 08:44 AM   #13
DAVID NANCARROW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 2000
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,761
What this all points out to me is that a high capacity anything is NOT going to save your bacon if you can't hit what you're trying to put down in the first place. If or when I end up in another firefight and all I have is my wits and a firearm, regardless of what that firearm is, I'm going to make myself very small and extremely hard to get to, and the bg is going to have to expose himself in order to take a shot at me. I'll be waiting..............
DAVID NANCARROW is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 01:09 PM   #14
C.R.Sam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,858
Lot of good stats and a lot of bad stat presentations.

One of our members was nailed in the sturnum by a 9mm at near contact range, while falling back he dumped six .44s in perp. Stats that could be derived from that encounter include. 9mm failed to stop. .44 required six shots to stop. Non LEO fired one shot per engagement. LEO fired six shots per engagement.

Nuther local one. Leo fires 15 rounds at very close range, does not stop perp. Therefore 9mm is worthless.

Sam
C.R.Sam is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 01:59 PM   #15
Warm Bore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 170
Scoops,

I've gotta agree with buzz_knox...

3 is 2
2 is 1
1 is none
and none is just kinda' dumb.

Not a flame, just an observation. Carry what you're comfotable with.

Regards and stay safe,

Warm Bore
Warm Bore is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 02:30 PM   #16
BigG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,334
How do you get .3 of a shot?
BigG is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 02:43 PM   #17
Jay Baker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 26, 2000
Location: S.W. Idaho
Posts: 1,294
Scoops, I agree with Buzz Knox & Warm Bore. It seems apparent to me that you believe that you're the only person in the gun-owning world, upon whose shoulder, Mr. Murphy DOES NOT ride.

I know a man who got into a self defense shooting, ran his revolver dry against two bad guys, and when he was outta ammo, one of them blew the good guy's daughter's head off with a shotgun.

As the old saying goes, "Ya pays your nickel and ya takes your chances." As for me, no one will ever catch me without an additional spare loaded magazine, or speed strip for my revolver.

FWIW. J.B.
Jay Baker is offline  
Old July 20, 2001, 10:47 PM   #18
cana
Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2000
Location: Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
Posts: 28
This data is from the NYPD. So, we must consider a few things:

1- These shots were all fired by cops. And we all know that most cops aren't good shooters. Ok, I know we're not the best shooters in the world, but I still think that we shoot much better than cops that don't like guns and don't practice frequently.

2 - Cops many times face situations that involves multiple BGs. Civilians hardly ever have to do that.

3- Standard ammo was LRN and, if I'm correct, SWC too for a long time. Speedloaders weren't even allowed, until a cop was shot and killed by a drug dealer, while trying to reload the empty revolver. That leaves our cops with a bad gun/ammo combo, usually requiring more rounds to stop the BG.

That's why I don't get too much worried about the data shown by the NYPD...
cana is offline  
Old July 21, 2001, 12:05 AM   #19
bullfrog99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2000
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 811
SAMPLE POPULATION

4 out of 5 people = 80% of the population

(don't beleive statistics, ever wonder how three different toothpastes can be recomended number one by 70% of dentists...)
bullfrog99 is offline  
Old July 21, 2001, 01:17 AM   #20
orlando5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2001
Location: Somewhere in wonderland.
Posts: 699
Quote:

From David Nancarrow:

What this all points out to me is that a high capacity anything is NOT going to save your bacon if you can't hit what you're trying to put down in the first place. If or when I end up in another firefight and all I have is my wits and a firearm, regardless of what that firearm is, I'm going to make myself very small and extremely hard to get to, and the bg is going to have to expose himself in order to take a shot at me. I'll be waiting..............
Life never happen the way you want it to be.

The one who fire first and fire many will be the one that is most likely be standing in the end.
orlando5 is offline  
Old July 21, 2001, 08:07 AM   #21
Dead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
Double Naught Spy,

There was a suicide in my town years ago, the person fired 3 shots into their heart, and was still able to walk a few feet and lay down in their bed before dying.
Dead is offline  
Old July 22, 2001, 12:24 AM   #22
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,793
Dead, that does not surprise except in the part that the suicidal person was very goal determined. We talk about failures to stop goal determined bad guys, but not goal determined suicides.

As a retired cop, my pop often had cop visitors. As I recall, it was in the late 1970s that the story took place. It seemed this guy wanted to commit suicide, but really did not have a good grasp on the concepts of fire power and how the gun he used was going to work. He had managed to load .22 into a .25 and proceeded to shoot himself 6 times in the head on the surface of the cranium, none of the bullets penetration the skull although most were secured in the cranium. Finally, he either fired the last shot through the eye, ear, or roof of mouth and finally did die. You have to figure that each shot to the head must have felt like getting hit by a hammer or some similary painful object.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old July 22, 2001, 12:48 AM   #23
Oleg Volk
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 7,022
And the .25 functioned!?
Oleg Volk is offline  
Old July 22, 2001, 04:21 AM   #24
labgrade
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
Last compilation of total, country-wide LEO firearms engagements I've heard was 1.5 shots & at 7 feet - that's the average.

Includes "state police-type" long-range through contact range "city-type" engagements.

No source, but actually sounds more accurate & without suicides & ancillaries which really have no bearing on this.
labgrade is offline  
Old July 22, 2001, 09:27 AM   #25
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
APPLY AS NEEDED

Sight alignment trigger control............as many as required.

Whether I have 5, 6, 8, 10, or 15 in my gun it DOES NOT CHANGE where I want the first shot to go -- COAM ("center of available mass").

If I do it correctly then I am not average, eh?




---------------------------------------------

"all my shootings are fantasy shootings"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08356 seconds with 7 queries