![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,130
|
Tumbling Bullets
Before loading, has anyone tumbled bullets. I have a box of pointed soft point .257 bullets that have a little haze on them. The only reason I can think of to not tumble is perhaps damaging the soft point.
Comments!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
If they are clean, shoot them as is unless you want to enter them in a beauty contest.
Last edited by Bart B.; January 29, 2021 at 06:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 1,475
|
Flitz and a soft cloth while watching TV.
A vibratory tumbler might not deform the bullets much but a rotary one will likely have severe deformation if not removal of the soft tips.
__________________
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ All data is flawed, some just less so. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
Tumble or vibratory?
I would think tumble might damage the tips, in a vibratory would they sink to the bottom? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,334
|
Dang I thought it was about going end over end down range!
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,130
|
Sorry, vibratory.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,384
|
I wouldn't go through the bother just because I'm lazy.
That said, I believe I've read somewhere that damage to the tip of the bullet doesn't degrade accuracy much at all but damage to the base can cause significant accuracy problems. Note: go to somebody like Unclenick for the real info about tip/base damage and accuracy. They know why, I only know what I think I remember I read somewhere. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,477
|
Tip vs base damage?
I don't remember which gun magazine it was in but there was an article testing this some decades ago. They shaved/cut numerous tips in different ways, and then took some of the same bullets nd drilled/cut the bases and shot them for comparison. Bullets with mangled/deformed tips remained fairly accurate. Bullets with damaged bases did not. Basically it has to do with area and rotational stability. Even a big chunk off the nose doesn't affect the bullet's spin the way a chunk out of the base does.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,334
|
Quote:
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,477
|
Dingy jacketed bullets shine up pretty with a few twists in some 0000 steel wool. No polish needed.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4,602
|
no, cant say that I have.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,742
|
I've soaked bullets in mineral spirits to get the forming lube traces off for subsequent application of a dry lube (moly or hBN). Otherwise, knowing the target won't be admiring their shine on their way through, I don't bother.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 19,175
|
Sierra once compared polished vs unpolished bullets. As I recall, the unpolished shot just as well but were not shiny like customers expect. Bart probably has details.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,742
|
It's a predictable result for the same reason rifling marks on a bullet don't change its ballistics appreciably: the air boundary layer over the bullet surface in flight is thicker than the engraving marks. It is certainly thicker than some surface oxidation.
Nose damage will affect long-range accuracy by changing the ballistic coefficient of the bullet and by introducing some wobble in flight. It opens groups by the same mechanism as tilted bullet so, which is by lateral drift due to the center of gravity being off-center in the rifling at the moment it clears the muzzle. But any bias the nose shape creates for off-axis drag is reversed on opposite sides of the rotation, so any amount by which that drag moves the bullet one way it undoes a half a rotation later. This limits its effect. The base, though, if it redirects muzzle blast by its unevenness, is deflected into a larger lateral drift that stays with the bullet all the way to the target.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|