The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 29, 2017, 12:03 AM   #1
Stats Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2016
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,636
Turning necks

I'm curious as to the degree of consistency y'all consider acceptable for neck thickness. I haven't been turning necks for too long but with my setup, about the best I can do is within 0.002. That's certainly a lot better than un-turned necks in some brass which I have seen having a spread of 0.007 or 0.008.

I have certainly noticed a difference in accuracy with turned necks. Mostly in the absence of flyers.
Stats Shooter is offline  
Old April 29, 2017, 07:05 AM   #2
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 5,175
Are you measuring the neck diameter or neck wall thickness?

I measure the neck wall thickness at several points around the perimeter. My standard is 0.012 +/- .0005". For brass with thin neck wall, I do 0.01 +/- .0005".

-TL
tangolima is online now  
Old April 29, 2017, 12:00 PM   #3
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 7,135
.007 to .008 I have to say that's more then I've ever heard of . That's .004 on each side , I don't even see that being possible , you would be able to see .008 with the naked eye . I think the most I've seen was a total of .004 . I may be misunderstanding what you're saying though .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old April 29, 2017, 12:09 PM   #4
Stats Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2016
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,636
Quote:
That's .004 on each side , I don't even see that being possible
Yup...0.0185 and 0.0115.....But not on the same case, that was the variation in neck thickness from brass of a lot of Winchester I had
Stats Shooter is offline  
Old April 29, 2017, 12:22 PM   #5
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 5,175
0.0185" is too thick. Guess that's why you turn neck. Too thick for the loaded round to chamber. Worst case is the bullet is clamped in by the neck of the chamber and causes high pressure when the gun fires.

0.012" is my norm. Sometimes I need to reduce it to 0.011" for tight chambers.

-TL
tangolima is online now  
Old April 29, 2017, 01:03 PM   #6
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 7,135
I see , I thought you were talking one case had a .008 variance . I was thinking holy cow I could see that just by looking at it .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old April 29, 2017, 01:07 PM   #7
Stats Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2016
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,636
I agree, too thick. What you will find is one side will be 0.017 or something, and the other 0.014. and the next case 0.015- 0.0115.

They'll chamber but it will be snug....Sort of a crimp via throat . And then you'll wonder why you have fliers.

It isn't like that with premium brass. But the cheap stuff can vary quite a bit
Stats Shooter is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04096 seconds with 7 queries