The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 28, 2017, 11:45 AM   #1
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
6.5x55 Sporter - Mystery Clackamas Build

I am new here, this is my first post. Check out this neat sporter I snagged at my LGS. It is a Mauser 98 build using a Turkish action, Swedish 6.5x55 modded barrel (perhaps a 96?), with B marked bolt, Dayton Mark II safety, in a plastic Butler Creek stock. Its an Ankara marked receiver, with B marked bolt. Says "Sporting Arms, Clackamas, OR Mauser 98" and "6.5x55" on barrel. Receiver markings also include NAC RID NJ.

I assume it was a Kinder sporterization, insofaras Warne's first company was called Sporting Arms, they did work in Clackamas (and nearby Colton), and later had operations in Ridgefield, NJ.

Nice gun. Looking foward to hunting with it.
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 11:51 AM   #2
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 11:52 AM   #3
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 11:53 AM   #4
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 11:55 AM   #5
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockinrev View Post
I am new here, this is my first post. Check out this neat sporter I snagged at my LGS. It is a Mauser 98 build using a Turkish action, Swedish 6.5x55 modded barrel (perhaps a 96?), with B marked bolt, Dayton Mark II safety, in a plastic Butler Creek stock. Its an Ankara marked receiver, with B marked bolt. Says "Sporting Arms, Clackamas, OR Mauser 98" and "6.5x55" on barrel. Receiver markings also include NAC RID NJ.

I assume it was a Kinder sporterization, insofaras Warne's first company was called Sporting Arms, they did work in Clackamas (and nearby Colton), and later had operations in Ridgefield, NJ.

Nice gun. Looking foward to hunting with it.
Kimber not Kinder

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 09:49 PM   #6
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
NAC RID NJ is the importer markings of the origininal rifle. Navy Arms Corperation Ridgefield New Jersey. The reciever was marked as required by the 1968 GCA.
SHR970 is offline  
Old March 28, 2017, 09:54 PM   #7
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
NAC RID NJ is the importer markings of the origininal rifle. Navy Arms Corperation Ridgefield New Jersey. The reciever was marked as required by the 1968 GCA.

Considering Clackamas isn't exactly a large community it would seem you have a Kimber conversion. It would be a Turkish Mauser if cock on opening or Swedish Mauser (M96) if cock on closing; they did both variants.
SHR970 is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 01:28 AM   #8
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,773
Quote:
Considering Clackamas isn't exactly a large community it would seem you have a Kimber conversion. It would be a Turkish Mauser if cock on opening or Swedish Mauser (M96) if cock on closing; they did both variants.
Or either, since conversion kits are available to convert COC '93 and '96 bolts to COO; in addition to re-arsenal conversions that had been done 90-100 years ago.

(But he already said it's Turkish.)
__________________
-Unwilling Range Officer
-Unwilling Match Designer
-NRL22/PRS22/PRO
-Something about broccoli and carrots
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 03:16 AM   #9
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,249
Or he could have a pieced together parts gun that was assembled from the bones of several old rifles. Who knows? The Kimber conversions were done on Swedish 1896s, and that is a Turkish 98, so we know it's probably not one of the Kimbers.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 09:04 AM   #10
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
In Post #3, you can see the old rear sight screw hole is no longer indexed at the top. I sold a few of the "original Kimber" re-furbs and all the 6.5x55 I saw had the original barrel untouched other than removing sights and polishing/bluing.
Mobuck is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 06:41 PM   #11
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
(But he already said it's Turkish.)
You're right, he did say Ankra Marked Reciever.

Quote:
and that is a Turkish 98, so we know it's probably not one of the Kimbers.
Not so fast. There are plenty of documented Turkish Conversions since the Turk Mausers may have been large ring but they were made for small shank barrels.

Also, having been to Clackamas and Colton (my mother lived in Colton for 16 years of my adult life) I can tell you that neither are exactly large thriving gun centers.
SHR970 is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 06:52 PM   #12
Rob228
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
I saw one of those in .243 a while back.
Rob228 is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 07:04 PM   #13
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
AFAIK the Swedish 96 barrels are small ring and the Ankara 98s take small ring barrels. It seems pretty unlikely there were two companies making 6.5 sporters from old Mauser parts in Clackamas. I would bet it was done by some version of "Kimber" - FWIW. I paid $250 for it with a box of good Hornady ammo. Happy with that.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 08:10 PM   #14
Rob228
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
The one I saw was marked Kimber.
Rob228 is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 08:46 PM   #15
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
Kimber was started by Greg Warne and his dad Jack. The elder Warne was an Australian whose original company "Sporting Arms" was bought by Omark, which owned many brands, like Speer and others. Jack was the engineering genius who had cut his teeth by sporterising old Enfields and his Kimber company made 22s and other rifles. Eventually the Warnes got out of Kimber in the late 80s. Warne Manufacturing now makes scope mounts.

My guess is Jack Warne had something to do with my Mauser build from Sporting Arms of Clackamas. Hopefully somebody who knows the whole story can confirm.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 08:49 PM   #16
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
The Warne family moved to Oregon from Australia in late 60s and Jack Warne presided over Omark's gun related businesses until the mid 80s, when he and son started Kimber.



Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 09:29 PM   #17
Blindstitch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,696
How much did you pay for it and how well does it shoot? Looks like a good gun to me.

As for the questions on Kimber or not I think if you try to sell it there will be a big he said she said issue. But on the other hand I buy guns to shoot and i'm sure you do to so enjoy it.

If you can find provenance nail it down and keep multiple copies so someone in the future doesn't think it's a nicely put together piece of random mausers.
Blindstitch is offline  
Old March 29, 2017, 10:22 PM   #18
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
Now all it needs is some ordinary Walnut.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 07:46 AM   #19
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
$250 for the gun and a box of ammo. Taking out to the farm to shoot soon.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 11:03 AM   #20
doofus47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
$250? Win! Nice rifle.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time.
doofus47 is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 11:28 AM   #21
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
Nice smooth bolt. Trigger not bad. Good clean bore. Lightweight. Cool cartridge. I have high hopes for deer season as a bang around gun to climb trees with.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 03:41 PM   #22
Blindstitch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,696
There might be a Timney trigger in your future. Should be drop in easy.
Blindstitch is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 08:26 PM   #23
smarquez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2011
Posts: 135
It looks like there is some kind of adapter screwed into the action and the barrel is screwed into that. There is an extra shoulder there. I would have given $250 for that. Did it come with the scope and mounts? I have a Kimber 96 Sporter in 6.5 Swede and it is a good gun but I could not get a Boyd trigger to work on it. It would not catch the cocking piece.
smarquez is offline  
Old March 30, 2017, 09:54 PM   #24
rockinrev
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2017
Posts: 11
It came with mounts and rings and a Trashco which I replaced with a Leupold 2-7

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
rockinrev is offline  
Old March 31, 2017, 07:18 AM   #25
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,498
Quote:
$250? Win! Nice rifle.
Could be nice, but it could be a pile of parts. It all depends on how it shoots. I had a Kimber sporter M96 6.5X55 and best it could hold was around 4 MOA. That was after I bedded the stock, replaced the trigger, and converted to cock-on-open. Before that it was about a 6 MOA rifle with factory or hand loaded fodder. I wound up giving the rifle away rather than mess with it anymore.

For $250 it is definitely worth taking a risk on a rifle, but don't be heart broken if it doesn't shoot well. If it doesn't shoot well send it off and have a new barrel put on it in 6.5X55, replace the trigger and properly bed it. My guess is you'll have a tack driver.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.14930 seconds with 7 queries