The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 20, 2014, 11:55 AM   #1
Snub
Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Posts: 19
Thermal Imaging Scope

[B]I bought an AK47 strictly for protection. I estimate the target to be very short range: around 20 – 40 yards. If I were forced to protect my family, night time conditions will come into play, so I want a scope that will handle this. I’m seriously leaning toward a thermal imaging scope vs. a NV. Here’s the issue: Other than what I researched on the Internet I know nothing about thermal scopes and they’re too darn expensive to buy one I won’t be pleased with.

I do not want to pay additional money for one offering video recording if there is such a thing. I do want one that can be used in both daytime and nighttime conditions and because the target range will be so close I think anything over 1x – 1.5x magnification would be too strong.

If possible I would like to pay in the $4,000 range, but am open to $6,000 - $7,000 if necessary to get what I want with high quality. I’m not concerned about low battery life because I would keep a bunch of them on hand. Here are some questions:

Is there a difference between a sight and a scope?

What do I look for in a good thermal imaging scope?

Are there thermal imaging scopes that work well in sunlight and dark (night) conditions?

Would I be better off buying a red dot scope for daylight conditions and a thermal scope for nighttime? Quick release scopes, of course.

Are they durable or will I need to replace a part or parts over time? Keep in mind that the ONLY time I would use it would be IF the need would arise to protect my family at night. I do not hunt and have no hog problems.

And please offer suggestions as to what scope you would recommend.[/
B]
Thanks.

Last edited by Snub; April 20, 2014 at 01:24 PM.
Snub is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 11:34 AM   #2
mxsailor803
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 1,344
Don't take this as being rude, have you ever considered a flashlight light mount with good iron sights with glow paint? It just seems that you are wanting to head over to the extreme side of optics with out being positive with what you want. Since its mainly for HD, I see the thermal scope becoming a hinderance, more than helpful. Mainly size. Those things are not small or light weight by any means. Remember, most HD situations will be very close. Like close enough that you would have to aim a shotgun like a rifle close. For that reasoning, I would steer clear of a magnifying optic. A simple red dot could work, if you remember to turn it on during a high-stress situation. The same would apply to a thermal optic.
mxsailor803 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 06:42 PM   #3
Snub
Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Posts: 19
Thermal Imaging

The issue I have with a flashlight is the target will easily see where I am, but someone who is very informed about scopes suggested the same thing today. I might just do that. I'm tired of researching.

Today a salesperson told me I should buy a PVS-14 Night Vision Monocular that sits behind the scope. He told me that it's so effective I could recognize faces at night. I have a hard time believing that.
Snub is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 06:58 PM   #4
mxsailor803
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 1,344
That sounds a little far fetched to me. I'd ask the sales guy to prove that one.
mxsailor803 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 07:09 PM   #5
Snub
Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Posts: 19
Flashlight

mxsailor803 - You and about 20 members of another forum have convinced me to go with the flashlight.

Thanks for saving me lots of $$$$$$$$$
Snub is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 07:14 PM   #6
mxsailor803
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 1,344
Oh I ain't saving you any money. GO BUY AMMO lol.
mxsailor803 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 07:27 PM   #7
Snub
Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Posts: 19
I have enough ammo, and I agree with you about the scope. It would need to be proved to me.
Snub is offline  
Old April 22, 2014, 05:45 AM   #8
Old Stony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
I have to agree, the flashlight is the better alternative here. I have been playing with a thermal scope shooting hogs, and at a close range they would only hinder you. You have to place your head onto the stock to see through the scope and get your eye to focus on something and you just can't do it quickly at a short distance. The night vision goggles might be an alternative, I haven't played with any of those yet, but I just couldn't imagine waking up to a noise and fumbling on a set of goggles in the middle of the night.
Old Stony is offline  
Old April 22, 2014, 07:39 AM   #9
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
I estimate the target to be very short range: around 20 – 40 yards.
Your biggest problem is going to be FOV.

Night Vision & thermal have a tight Field Of View compared to the human eye. At those close distances you're going to find it a huge liability.

Imagine (or even try) this. Rubber band or tape the card core from a roll of TP to the top of the rifle. Now, while looking through the tube clear a room or set of rooms.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old April 22, 2014, 11:04 AM   #10
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
It's hard for me to imagine a realistic, American civilian self defense scenario that involves engaging targets from 40 yards away.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old April 23, 2014, 09:45 AM   #11
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
Quote:
It's hard for me to imagine a realistic, American civilian self defense scenario that involves engaging targets from 40 yards away.
And yet we have discussed them here...
http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...+park+shooting

Not as the title claimed, but more than 40 yards.

The you have Tacoma Mall where the CCWer didn't engage the shooter at long distance. Several open space mall shootings would have people in danger at greater than 40 yards where they could be justified and realistically return fire.

Charlie Whitman and the UT Tower shooter incident

Vang and the Wisconsin hunter's incident would have been and excellent case where long distance self defense would have been necessary...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2004/11...ting-massacre/

The 1979 Cleveland school shooting occurred across a street at distances exceeding 40 yards.

If somebody is trying to kill you from distance such as with a firearm, be it 1 yard or 400, you can engage in self defense. People have been targeted at longer ranges, though there were not always people there to engage back.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old April 23, 2014, 10:08 AM   #12
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
I don't know if you've ever used thermal imaging scopes but they cant tell the difference between your kids coming in late at night or a bandit.

I also question 40 yards for self defense, unless you're talking about protecting domestic live stock from predators. Again identification could be a problem.

For home defense, its hard to beat night lights to help with identification. For protecting livestock a good spot light is hard to beat. Night lights are crucial for me, I have a midnight Black Lab that I trip over walking around at night.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old April 23, 2014, 11:56 AM   #13
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Quote:
And yet we have discussed them here...
None of which involved or would have been aided by a thermal scope nor do any of them fit the OPs description.

I might get hit by a meteor too but I'm not spending $4,000 to stop it from happening.

Sooner or later, things have to be far enough down the probability and/or cost/benefit list that we simply ignore them.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07137 seconds with 7 queries