The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 6, 2011, 10:37 PM   #1
kylewood
Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 48
light and hot load for Ar

I'm wanting to load some real light bullets for my 16" AR with a 1 in 9" twist. I was planning on starting with 40 grain V-max boat tail with a splash of Varget. Can anybody give some input or possibly recommend something better?

Wood
kylewood is offline  
Old July 6, 2011, 11:13 PM   #2
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,733
Don't use a "splash" of Varget or any other slow powder intended for heavier bullets if you value your gun. It can cause a high pressure spike or chamber or bore ringing. Hodgdon says 25 grains is minimum at your bullet weight and it is not safe to go lower. It's not a good powder choice for a light bullet anyway, as it wants more to push against as it builds pressure. If you want a truly light plinking load either use 7 grains of Trail Boss or for a little warmer, 7 grain of Unique or a bit more, 12 grains of 2400. No light load is likely to function the action, so these would be one-at-a-time loads.

If you want something that makes enough gas to function the action AR with that light bullet, you'll need a rifle load with a powder that's relatively quick, as rifle powders go. Try about 20 grains of IMR 4198 to start.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old July 6, 2011, 11:26 PM   #3
kylewood
Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 48
I meant a light bullet and a hot load. like maybe 3700 fps.

Wood
kylewood is offline  
Old July 7, 2011, 03:55 PM   #4
LarryFlew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2009
Location: Minnesota CZ fan
Posts: 902
http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/de...Powder&Source=

has some loads in your range. At those grains all will be compressed loads so expect full cases.
LarryFlew is offline  
Old July 7, 2011, 09:02 PM   #5
kylewood
Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 48
Thanks for the help. Is high velocity hard on a chrome barrel like it is on a carbon barrel?

Wood
kylewood is offline  
Old July 8, 2011, 12:08 PM   #6
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,733
Sure. It just resists longer. The main thing that does damage is differential heat expansion. Firing gases heat the bore surface far faster than the heat can penetrate steel. It only gets a couple thousandths into the steel by the time the bullet exits. That means the top two thousandth expand while the base metal does not, and the difference in size eventually fatigues the connection between the surface and base metal. It winds up with heat stress cracks, looking like an alligator skin, and finally the squares in the pattern start to break off.

Chrome is tough and will resist that longer than plain steel, but not forever. You just need to decide how often you want to replace the barrel. The maker may be able to tell you how its life expectancy compares as a ratio to normal steel, and I expect that ratio will hold up with the hotter loads, too.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03775 seconds with 7 queries