The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 25, 2008, 02:03 PM   #1
Foxbat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
Squib Detector - sooner or later it will happen to you.

Sooner or later you will make a round with no powder. Or worse yet - whole bunch of them, mixed with good ammo.

Bad news... as these are often hard to find. People shake them and listen... but this is often hard, as the charge can be small, and your hearing... well, let's face it, some of us are not exactly spring chickens.

But all is not lost, and there is a very simple way of finding the empty rounds among the good ones. You need to spend $15 on this listening device.

The microphone on this unit is on its top, so hold the round pressed to it, as shown in the picture, and shake the round length-wise. Make sure the headphones cord is not dangling freely, as it will create its own noise - simply tape it to the body.

Very quickly you will learn to spot a full round, an empty one, and the ones with just a small amount of powder, you will heat it all very clearly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00909.JPG (94.4 KB, 341 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00908.JPG (64.3 KB, 233 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00907.JPG (64.1 KB, 235 views)
Foxbat is offline  
Old January 25, 2008, 02:35 PM   #2
Grandpa Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2007
Posts: 140
That is what I use to help me discriminate human voices from background noise. When watching a movie, if the characters are talking in reduced volume compared with the sound track, that device helps me greatly. Even if I turn the volume up on the TV it is still just gibberish. Mine cost something like $15.00. Good suggestion!
__________________
Old enough to know better and way too old to care!
Grandpa Shooter is offline  
Old January 25, 2008, 02:49 PM   #3
XD40Tac
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2008
Posts: 96
There's a little bit of dirt under your thumbnail.
XD40Tac is offline  
Old January 25, 2008, 05:41 PM   #4
38 Super Auto
Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: In God we trust
Posts: 32
I have several squib detectors. Several are chambered in military calibers.
38 Super Auto is offline  
Old January 25, 2008, 09:02 PM   #5
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
Get a press with a "powder check station" - and I'll firmly state that if you know what you're doing, you will prevent these problems 100% . Its not inevitable.
BigJimP is offline  
Old January 26, 2008, 01:18 AM   #6
Goldy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 163
Read on another forum where a guy uses his powder funnel. Just drop the funnel down over the base of the cartridge and shake by your ear. I tried it and it works very well. Cheap too.
Goldy is offline  
Old January 26, 2008, 01:30 AM   #7
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,733
But doesn't your head get tired of all that shaking?

I didn't realized someone had a current commercial variation on the early transistorized (now there's a word you don't often hear anymore) hearing aid. I built one for the grandfather of a girlfriend I had in college, though it was for regular headphones. They were the only way to get high fidelity back then (early 70's). The modern ear buds are surprisingly good, so this is a logical step back into the past.

Nick
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old January 26, 2008, 10:52 AM   #8
MADISON
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2000
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 2,678
Squib loads....

Been there---Dun That!
Get yourself a POWDER CHECKER DIE.
I can not get my RCBS Lock Out Die to work.
MADISON is offline  
Old January 26, 2008, 11:04 AM   #9
Alleykat
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
My RCBS Lockout Die works. Then, there's always eyeballs.
Alleykat is offline  
Old January 26, 2008, 11:31 AM   #10
Foxbat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
Never say never... after about 25 years and tens of thousands of rounds it finally happened.

The point is not how good or lucky you are. It is about the time you suspect there might be empties in the lot - what you do. I tried the funnel, for me it doesn't work - maybe my head is too heavy...

I have the Lock-Out die coming, and will try it, but I would have to re-arrange the dies on all the presses, and besides, I have total of about 9 complete heads... or ten... meaning ten times $55 (including shipping) for Lock-Out dies.

That is the price of yet another Glock.

Anyway, it took me just several minutes to sort through 200 rounds of .45's with this device, which I already had.
Foxbat is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 12:27 PM   #11
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,078
Dillon’s powder check die will check for under as well as over charges. If you think a squib is inevitable then so is a double charge and that’s a much more serous scenario. $55, how much are your pistols worth?
jmorris is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 12:31 PM   #12
Wuchak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 1,093
Isn't the safest check to just weigh each round?

Weigh an unloaded shell, primer, and bullet first to find the empty weight for comparison.
Wuchak is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 12:53 PM   #13
grymster2007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: In the oak studded hills near Napa
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Isn't the safest check to just weigh each round?

Weigh an unloaded shell, primer, and bullet first to find the empty weight for comparison.
Probably OK.... if you did this for each round. Otherwise, variations in brass, bullet and primer weight might well exceed the weight of the powder, making it impossible to do.
grymster2007 is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 04:21 PM   #14
Foxbat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
Randomly pulled two .45 cases - weight difference more than 6 grains.
Foxbat is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 04:37 PM   #15
grymster2007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: In the oak studded hills near Napa
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Randomly pulled two .45 cases - weight difference more than 6 grains.
Yup! I've found 4 grains difference in a pair of 240 grain bullets... and I haven't looked particularly hard. If the variance in components can easily exceed the entire charge weight, better look for an alternative method.
grymster2007 is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 10:46 PM   #16
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
The best 'squib detector' is the Mark I eye ball.
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old January 27, 2008, 11:08 PM   #17
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,480
Thank you for the idea, sir. I check for powder by storing empty cases I will fill upside down, then moving them upright to the next loading block after filling. After every one is right side up in the next block, I grab my $1.98 flashlight, and eyball the inside of each case for powder. After that is done, and overdone, when I begin loading bullets, I look inside the case right before putting it in the ram. Way overkill? Yeah, but worth it.
Thank you for the idea, might be something to snag from the "Seen on TV" aisle at Wally World.
armoredman is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 08:26 AM   #18
Martyn4802
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2007
Location: Grayling, Michigan
Posts: 737
T. O'Heir nailed it.
For ALL of my reloading, after charging cases with powder, I look down into each and every case to make sure all cases have powder in them. I have the cases in a loading block, and use a flashlight to look into each case.
I started reloading in 1948, and have been doing this ever since. I've never had a squib load.
The point here being, if you undertake to reload, you must be responsible for doing it correctly, by incorporating a step in your procedure to insure every case has powder in it. Reloading is a responsible task.

Martyn
Martyn4802 is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 11:00 AM   #19
Foxbat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
Loading blocks don't work too well with progressive presses...

I guess those who never make mistakes don't need to worry about the Lock-Out dies or other detectors.
Foxbat is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 11:21 AM   #20
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldy
Read on another forum where a guy uses his powder funnel. Just drop the funnel down over the base of the cartridge and shake by your ear. I tried it and it works very well. Cheap too.
That would have been me. I posted it here too. Works great and it's already on your reloading bench.
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 11:30 AM   #21
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,078
I’ll have to admit I laughed when the though of a powder check die on a single stage entered my mind. The eyeball does work great when your not using a progressive press with tiny charges of fast powder that make up most competitive pistol loads. When you’re reloading by the 1000’s “weighing each charge”, to a progressive user, would be much like telling a single stage user to count out each individual piece of powder for each load. So, yes a powder check isn’t for everyone, but you also wouldn’t need a seat belt if you walked everywhere.
jmorris is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 11:47 PM   #22
geezer in NH
Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2007
Posts: 80
I have loaded over 500,000 rounds of pistol cartidges on a single stage press. Eyeballed all powder charges in the block and have NEVER had a squib!!!!!

All you guys with the progressive preeses need the powder check alert and need to pay attention when loading or you will mess up.
geezer in NH is offline  
Old January 31, 2008, 11:06 PM   #23
Foxbat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
OK... so we will miss one in twenty years. The risk? None. Slight embarrassment, that's all.

Single stage vs. Progressive... the OTHER Thirty Year War.
Foxbat is offline  
Old January 31, 2008, 11:29 PM   #24
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,480
No war, I just like my single stage, no issues with anyone who uses a turret or progressive. I load for fun, not for volume. No big deal.
armoredman is offline  
Old February 1, 2008, 07:06 AM   #25
Thesenator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Posts: 126
Foxbat......there is great risk when you are firing a 900 round per minute machinegun or submachinegun. If the bullet goes far enough into the barrel to allow another to chamber behind it, it can be very expensive and dangerous to both shooter and bystanders.

I've seen and stopped several people on ranges over the years, who have had squibs in pistols and they didn't even know what happened as they were trying to rack another round into an obstructed bore. When I yelled ceasefire and went over to them and pointed out what had just happened they about $#it themselves.

I've pounded more than a half dozen lodged bullets from other peoples pistol barrels at the range just in the past few years. Most of them were new reloaders and didn't even know what the term "squib" meant. Thats a risk in itself.
Thesenator is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08187 seconds with 8 queries