The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 29, 2006, 02:29 AM   #1
BPShunter
Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2006
Posts: 57
7.62 ammunition questions.

Hi,
I know this is probably a noob question but I'm not very experienced with military calibers. What is the difference between the different types of 7.62 ammunition? There's the 7.62x39mm, 7.62x51mm, and the 7.62x54R. There's also a 7.62x25 Tokarev which is a pistol caliber but I'm not concerned with this one, just the rifle calibers. I do know that one of these is the equivalent to the .308 Winchester civilian caliber. I also know that one of these is used in the SKS and/or AK rifles. Can anyone clarify? Thanks.
BPShunter is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 08:12 AM   #2
deanadell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2005
Location: Upstate, South Carolina
Posts: 639
7.62 denotes the caliber of the projectile in millimeters
The next number indicates the length of the case in millimeters

The 7.62 x 51 is the NATO equivalent of the .308 cartridge
The 7.62 x 39 is the AK/SKS round
The 7.62 x 54R is the old Russiam Mossin Nagant round, still currently used in their sniper rifles.

There is a slight difference if I remember correctly, in that the Soviet rounds actually measured .311 instead of .308
deanadell is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 11:35 AM   #3
blancoman
Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 37
And last but not least the 7.62x63 or 30-06 as it is better known. And yes you are right the russian is .311
blancoman is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 04:34 PM   #4
30Cal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2002
Posts: 1,264
Some people (and foreigners) refer to the 7.62mmNATO as "7.62x51". It's more or less interchangeable with .308Win depending on the chamber dimensions of the rifle.

Ty
30Cal is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 08:29 PM   #5
45reloader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 669
7.62mmNATO or "7.62x51" has thicker brass because of less chamber support in military guns.They are built to work under the dirtiest of conditions. Don't ever fire standard 308 Winchester ammo in a NATO chambered gun or you might have a big KaBoom.

7.62 is the diameter of the bullet.All the x25, x39 ,x51 is the overall length of the cartridge.

But these guys have already told you that.I just wanted to raise the post count.
45reloader is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 08:33 PM   #6
revjen45
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 626
Does this mean firing .223 in a 5.56mm chamber will result in KB?
revjen45 is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 09:16 PM   #7
Clayfish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 953
Quote:
Don't ever fire standard 308 Winchester ammo in a NATO chambered gun or you might have a big KaBoom
It's the other way around. You shouldn't fire 7.62x51 in a tight .308 chamber. You also should not fire 5.56 in a tight .223 chamber. .308 is fine to fire in a 7.62x51 chamber.
Clayfish is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 10:20 PM   #8
VUPDblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
clayfish beat me to it...
VUPDblue is offline  
Old December 29, 2006, 11:33 PM   #9
moose fat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2006
Location: Alaska, Yukon R. delta
Posts: 421
I just bought an Ishapore 2A in 7.62 and was visiting ParallaxBills "The Enfield Forum" http://p102.ezboard.com/bparallaxscu...firearmsforums getting knowledgable about my new old gun. There has been an ongoing debate on this topic. It is extremely relevent for shooting old mil-surps and I was lead to the following site.

http://www3.sympatico.ca/shooters/7_62vs308.htm
http://www.6mmbr.com/308Win.html
This last site the relevant info is near the bottom.

In a nut shell;
-.308 brass is thinner than 7.62...more gun powder
-7.62 brass is thicker than .308...less gun powder

The chamber pressure for .308 is/may be 12 000 psi greater than 7.62's max rated chamber pressure.

There is a great deal of information out there on the 7.62vs. .308. I had thought they were interchangable too.

Last edited by moose fat; December 29, 2006 at 11:46 PM. Reason: added another site
moose fat is offline  
Old December 30, 2006, 01:09 AM   #10
SavageCheesecake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 264
Theres also a 7.62 Nagant revolver cartridge.
SavageCheesecake is offline  
Old December 30, 2006, 02:02 PM   #11
BPShunter
Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2006
Posts: 57
Thanks

Thanks for all the replies. I've always found it interesting when people talk about the difference between 7.62 vs. .308 ammo as well as 5.56 vs. .223 ammo. I have a buddy that works for Winchester ammunition and he tells me that the only difference between the civilian and military rounds was the stamping on the base of the cartridge. Maybe he is mistaken but I would think he should know if he works there. Oh well!
BPShunter is offline  
Old December 31, 2006, 08:54 AM   #12
45reloader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 669
Put NATO brass and 308 brass on a scale and see how much more brass is in a NATO shell case.

http://www3.sympatico.ca/shooters/7_62vs308.htm

This might explain further that the 2 rounds are not interchangeable without risk.
45reloader is offline  
Old December 31, 2006, 09:39 AM   #13
Pappy John
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: the lower Susquehanna Valley
Posts: 848
Clayfish and VUPDblue.....

I can see where the thinner brass and higher pressure of commercial .308 used in the larger NATO spec chamber could lead to case rupture, but I don't see the problem with tougher brass, lower pressure rounds in a commercial chamber speced out to higher pressures.

Could you elaborate on your reasoning?

All my reading on the subject, plus personal experience (plenty of Aussie and South African surplus sent downrange through my .308 Ruger Frontier), says otherwise, but I'm open to new ideas.
Pappy John is offline  
Old December 31, 2006, 12:21 PM   #14
VUPDblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
I guess I really don't have a source... I always knew that it was bad mojo to use 5.56 in a .223 chamber so I assumed it was the same with .308/7.62. Pardon my ignorance on the subject. FWIW, I never use any of the above calibers in any of the other above calibers anyway.
VUPDblue is offline  
Old December 31, 2006, 02:44 PM   #15
Clayfish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 953
The thicker brass leads to smaller case capacity and when fired in a tight chamber where the brass cannot expand the pressure spike is much greater than commercial .308. The biggest problem will come from a tight match chamber.
Clayfish is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05530 seconds with 7 queries