![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 17
|
Red Dot in .44 Mag with 310 Grain Hardcast
I was on a powder manufacturer's site last week and found a recipe for 5.6 grains of Red Dot for use in the .44 Mag with a 310 grain hardcast lead projectile.
Problem is, I can't find the site again and don't know if that 5.6 grains was the low or high end of the suggested powder charge. I don't think it was Alliant's site....don't think they had listings for 310 grainers. Any information you can provide would be great. [edit:clarification] |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
This one? 5.8 is a maximum load. You should start 10% lower and wok your way up.
Welcome to The Firing Line!
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 17
|
Thanks. Reason I can't look is because of firewall restrictions at work.
What is the bottom load for that powder and that bullet? Minus 5% or something? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 27, 2005
Posts: 147
|
The table doesnt show but most manuals recommend a 10% reduction as a starting load
Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
Is this better?
![]() Not bad for an old fart, eh?
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 17
|
Sport45, you rock! Thank you!
I will start with 4.2 grains. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 25, 2005
Posts: 1,372
|
Be careful with the superlight loads. Sometimes they detonate instead if igniting and you'll see pierced primers. Find out whose LSWC they used.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: August 2, 2005
Posts: 87
|
I'm with 918v , he is %100 correct.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 17
|
So, might it behoove me to start at 4.4 grains instead of 4.2? I am using a gas check if that matters at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 25, 2005
Posts: 1,372
|
I'd go with the 10% rule. Still, find out whose bullet they used, because the position of the crimp grove and the profile of the nose will affect case volume, and pressure. Not all SWC are the same. RCBS and NEI make 310gr molds. Check into it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 17
|
Well, if it makes any difference, the ones I am using are from a Hornady mold....I believe. Have to ask the bullet guy when I pick up some more next week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
Quote:
The "detonation effect" comes into play when you try light loads of the slower powders. The faster powders like Bullseye can be loaded down as far as you like with the only documented danger being the sqib load. Titegroup is billed as not being position sensitive and is my powder of choice for the popcorn loads in revolvers. I've used it as low as 3.5 grains in .375win begind a 200gr cast bullet. Talk about powder getting lost in a big case! Just be careful not to double charge when using loads that don't fill the case very well. Here is a powder burn rate chart so you can see how they stack up. 700X is as slow as I go for reduced loads.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|