![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2005
Posts: 145
|
Opinions on Dragunov rifle ?
I don't know much about this rifle but I see the name in a lot of places, unfortunantly the information associated with it seems vague. I have been finding them for all sorts of different prices but is that only because of their conditions or were there different versions?.\ What are everyones opinions on it? Any one own one? Is it a purpose built rifle or simply a variant of the AK with a different stock? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 1999
Posts: 271
|
http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sn18-e.htm
This site gives a little history and pictures of a few of the variants. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2004
Posts: 495
|
The real SVD is a pretty decent purpose-built gun that's quite a bit different from an AK. The gun you posted a picture of is not a Drag' though, it's a fancy looking Romanian AK variant which has been reported as okay but not as good as the real thing. In any case, I don't have any hands on experience with either of them so I can't tell you much more than that. Sorry.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2005
Location: Alma, KS
Posts: 102
|
first, the above mentioned site is a good place to look up info for firearms, i have it bookmarked on my browser.
second the dragunov is and isn't an ak with a differnt stock. it uses a very similar action (that is a bit more fine tuned) to the ak, but it's usualy chambered for a 7.62 x 54 mm round. and if i remember correctly it is only semi auto. although i don't own one i have heard good things about them and the ammo they use. the price differnces could be from preban/postban dates of manufacture, their condition, or the country of origin. they are made by almost every country that makes ak varaints. read up on them a bit more and see what you find out. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 817
|
The Russian SVD and Chinese NDM86 are the real deal, and they're priced accordingly. The SVDs, if I recall correctly, go for $4000 on up, the NDMs were being sold over the summer by CDNN for $1800.
The Russian Tigr is the sporter version of the SVD. No longer imported, but last spring I saw a few people selling them used for $1200 or so. The Romanian PSL or Romak 3 is a lookalike built on an RPK (I think) receiver. Its priced far more reasonably, but its not a SVD. They should run you from $650 to $800. Even the finest SVDs aren't as accurate as a real sniper's weapon, they're meant for the designated marksman in the group, able to hit mansized targets far beyond the range of the AK47, but not exactly meant for ultra-preciscion work. The SVD was built to shoot 7.62x54R, although there's NDM-86's in .308. There was also at least one importer bringing in .308 Romak 3 rifles, but they evidently suffered from cheap plastic mags. You can also dress up your SKS or AK47 with a dragunov stock if you just wanna make it look fancypants. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Location: Home town of John M. Browning, Utah
Posts: 499
|
Draganov???
I had a little experience with a battle field pick-up Draganov over 30 yrs. ago. I was pretty under whelmed with it. We shot all the ammo we had for it and it wouldn't group smaller than about 4 inches at the best. It did go bang every time but wasn't very accurate for a dedicated sniper rifle. Had the Russian scope on it that seemed to be kinda odd to American tastes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 1999
Posts: 498
|
Radiki: +1 on the SVD. As noted by previous posters, the SVD (and Romanian FPK) are not "AK" clones (just use a somewhat similar action and control layout).
I've fired Russian & Polish military issue SVDs as well as the Romanian FPK series. As noted, these are combat weapons and properly fill the designated marksman niche vice being dedicated long range sniper rifles. Advantages are: 1) fires a full power .30 cal round (7.62 x 54 Soviet Rimmed) which provides equivalent or better ballistic performance than 7.62 NATO or .30-06. 2) routine practical accuracy out to 600 meters but a properly zeroed and scoped weapon can hit out to 800 if the shooter does his job. I would expect most used specimens to be around 1 MOA capable. If you are comfortable shooting an AR series accurately past 300 meters, you will enjoy the accuracy this weapon can provide. 3) extremely robust and reliable; functions well in all sorts of extreme field environments. Easy to maintain in field; "Ivan-proof". 4) semi-auto allows for fast follow-up or repeat shots. Firer can lay down semi-auto suppressive fire or engage rapidly at closer ranges. 5) With legal magazine (5 rd), the weapon makes a fine hunting rifle. Excellent with iron sights out to...say 300-350 meters. Easy carry in the field...not too heavy but heavy enough. 6) FPK is about half the cost of a Springfield M1A and a bit better accuracy than a lot of FAL clones. A greatly under-estimated value for the money. 7) an awful lot of scope & semi-auto capability/flexibility for around $800 8) lots of available mil-surplus scopes and night vision devices will mate to the integral mil-standard russian rail; as little or as much money as you want to spend. Adapters are available to mount commercial scopes as well. Most FPKs/SVDs come with the old PSO-1 scope (which takes some getting use to) but which has a battery powere illuminated reticle. Good feature for first/last light shots or for super-imposing reticle over darkly shadowed targets. Downside: 1) in no way, shape, or form is this a gun for CQB 2) ditto for vehicular carry due to length 3. not great for still hunting in close-in brush or forest vegetation (not that it can't do the job; it's just not a handy carbine) 4) if absolute accuracy is your goal, lots of bolt guns will shoot tighter groups. 5) AK fashion-fu as far as finish and furniture. If you love utilitarian mil-finish, you will love this rifle. If you like to drool over polished wood grain and bluing...get something else. Unless you are collecting Russian weapons, I'd buy the FPK and spend the savings on scope upgrade or ammo/range time. Good luck.
__________________
Figure The Odds... |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 8, 2002
Posts: 675
|
The Romanian PSL (not FPK, that is a US term), while it isn't a Dragunov, it is the exact same class of rifle (and is as much a sniper's rifle as the Dragunov, even if it is 1/4 the price) as the SVD or NDM. Like the Yugo M76, it uses the AK style long-stroke piston attached to the carrier. The PSL is the current Designated Marksman rifle of the Romanian army and in the field is generally as accurate and capable of the SVD. It isn't a knock off, as the Romanians were not trying to sell them commerically when they designed them. They went the Yugoslavian route and designed their own rifle. Odd, isn't it, that the Yugo's don't get slammed like the PSL's even though they are basically the same concept. It is just another rifle like the Romak III's. Oh, that's right, the Yugo m76's are just as expensive as the SVD's and like red making everything go faster, more money makes everything better. The Chinese NDM's that were $1,600 were .308 versions and are not really any more legitimate than the Tigr's. Chinese DNM's in 7.62x54R cost $2,400 or so. Real deal SVD's are expensive because they are very rare. Sure, they cost more to make than the PSL, but in reality they should be no more expensive than an M1a.
SVD owners hate to hear it, but the PSL is really basically just as good as the SVD. Neither have great accuracy, but accuracy is generally on par. The rifles imported right now, the Romaks, need some polishing to get them to Romanian military standards, but otherwise they really are just as good. I once owned two Romaks but their accuracy was not good enough to justify keeping. However, they are cool rifles in their own right. If you want one, the price is decent for a comblock DM rifle that does the same thing as an SVD. Keep in mind that the Savage you can get at Walmart will be much more accurate. Davis |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2005
Posts: 4
|
Lots of good posts, but I have to say that if you were only able to get about 4 MOA out of a real SVD, you either had a banged up gun, or possibly there were shooter problems.
Soviet theory on designated marksmen/snipers is quite different than the US theory of lone shooter making 800+ meter shots against single high priority targets. The Soviets used designated marksman at the squad level to make shots between 300 (which is the generallly accepted max range or infantry small arms normally) and 600 meters against targets to support infantry. It's a good system mixed with troops with GPMG's and it works so well that it is becoming more and more common for US troops to be doing it right now in Iraq and Afganistan. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 8, 2002
Posts: 675
|
One problem with all of them is the lack of sniper's ammo in the states. If decent ammo (I can't recall the designation) were available, they would all shoot better than they do. It would easily be possible to make the SVD/NDM/PSL sub 2 MOA with the right ammo. That said, I had a Romak that would do 2 MOA all day long with Sellier and Bellot ammo. Unfortunately, I had some primer problems with S&B, but accuracy was good.
Davis |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,334
|
I hate to say this but the Savage you buy down at Wal-Mart is probably not going to be more accurate than a Russky Dragunov, and in any case I think you will need a scope because there is no sighting system on the Savage. Just wanted to inject a little gravity into the discussion.
The standard for accuracy is far tighter than 4 MOA. I don't know where Davis got that? Mine will shoot better than 1 MOA with ball ammo. If you are a poor shot it will shoot as well as you do. They cost a lot but I would not trade mine for an M1A. In fact, I had both and sold the M1A because it was clunky in comparison. The Dragunov was designed for a scope and comes with one. You can detach it, replace it and you are still zeroed. They are not for everybody but the above post sure sounded like sour grapes. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: June 9, 2005
Posts: 51
|
ROMAK-3 is my next longgun. Accurate enough to take an animal at range, powerful enough for moose if I feel so inclined. Its still tough enough to rattle around in the back of a truck, and ask for more. One note nobody mentioned earlier.
With the AK/SVD scope mount system, you could actually zero 2-3 different optics..and swap between them in seconds. You could have a red-dot for close up hog hunting, a low power scope for plinking and a high power variable objective, lighted recticle scope for reaching out and touching stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: October 29, 2005
Posts: 63
|
I've always liked the SVD Dragunov and they are indeed (the Russian ones), awesome, however, in contrast to what some are saying I did not find any amongst the 4 ROMAK IIIs I shot to be worth a damn. Not that they were horrible but not what I had experienced with this one guy's tricked out SVD. I'd much rather convert an SKS to SKS-SRC status with an optional Dragunov-esque stock fitted with the PC Martel Shockwave Brake
![]() and get the claimed and proven Sub 1MOA out of it (by assistance of the SWB on the muzzle, not the stock... ![]() ![]() M91/30 "SRC" with the wooden stock exchanged for a synthetic one. It's old and doesn't have the quick follow up of the semi-autos, and hella cheap these days but it's reliable and gets the job done. Right now I've got a hard on for the Enfield No.4 MK 1 but everytime I get my hands one a M91/30 I think "Damn, got what I need right here." To each their own I guess, but if you're going to pay up the wazoo for a rifle unless you're just a fan of the Russian stuff (and there's nothing wrong with that) you'd be better off getting yourself a customized M1A (M21-SWS) for the price an actual "Russian" SVD is going to cost you. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 2005
Posts: 179
|
Opinion on REAL Dragunovs (to include the Tigr commercial versions)?
Damn nice rifles, way overpriced. They're no more accurate than a good M1A, but cost 2-3x what a good M1A does (4x what a baseline M1A goes for). However, if they could be imported again, the price could go drastically down, and then they'd be well worth it. The Romanian PSL is a beefed-up Ak to handle the 7.62x54R because the Romanians can't see paying what the Russian charge even client states for Drags. Not as accurate as a proper Drag, but not really a dog either. I happen to really like them. When people have them, the REAL Mosin Nagant sniper rifles are very accurate and run about the same price as a PSL. If you want accuracy for relatively cheap, this is a good way to go. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 817
|
What you pay for with the SVD clones isn't accuracy, its straight up badassitude.
I admit, I'm almost willing to buy into it. Except, when I had the spare $700 to drop there were none available, but there's not a cooler looking weapon around if you want something "menancing." Sure, your Nagant may shoot better, and it may appeal to an antique buff better, but face it.. Its not the same sort appeal that the PSL is gonna bring to the party. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: October 29, 2005
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|