The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 14, 2020, 01:29 AM   #26
Rangerrich99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Location: Kinda near Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbob86 View Post
It meters poorly and double charges are easily possible. If you factor in the cost of guns and ER visits, it's not really very cost effective to try to save money on the cheapest component of pistol reloading by using high energy low volume powders.
This depends. I've personally never had a double charge or serious problems with metering using TG and I've been using the stuff for about a decade, to the tune of over 9,000+ rounds loaded and fired. Generally it meters to about +/- 0.2 grains out of my crappy Lee powder measure. About the same as CFEPistol as a matter of fact.

But I do agree that care must be taken when using TG; you definitely don't want to get overconfident when using the stuff. But with reasonable caution it's a good powder for the applications listed above.
Rangerrich99 is offline  
Old August 14, 2020, 10:22 AM   #27
huntinaz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2010
Location: az
Posts: 1,332
Titegroup is awesome. Meters great and is accurate. Risk of a double charge is the same as the rest of the fast low-volume powders (it’s not the only popular one).
__________________
"When there’s lead in the air, there’s hope in the heart”- Hunter’s Proverb
"Feed me, or feed me to something. I just want to be part of the food chain." -Al Bundy
huntinaz is offline  
Old August 14, 2020, 03:55 PM   #28
totaldla
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,498
Titegroup is the color of case soot. The absolute best powder for double charges.
__________________
Keltec P15 at 1200 rounds
totaldla is offline  
Old August 14, 2020, 04:40 PM   #29
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,617
And now we have a TiteGroup thread

Quote:
It (TiteGroup) meters poorly and double charges are easily possible.
TiteGroup is a dense, fine powder. The two most important characteristics for consistent metering. TiteGroup meters excellent - way above average. One of the best.

As for double-charges: I load - by far - more 38 Special than any other chambering. Nobody is more atune to the dreaded double-charge than a 38 Special loader (tall case, small charges - most every recipe has double-charge potential). In the case of TiteGroup, some of my 38 target loads have such little powder volume that FIVE charges can fit in the case. Yes, TG takes up very little space (because it's so dense and potent).

Speaking only for myself, the fear of a double-charge is no reason to not use a specific propellant. If you load 38 Special and fear a double charge, that would mean all your ammunition would be with Trail Boss. I check my case fills before bullet placement. I consider it the most important step of safe loading. So I've never understood the logic of power selection based on double-charge potential.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old August 14, 2020, 09:41 PM   #30
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
I hate Titegroup, perhaps because 99% of the time I shoot lead bullets. But poor metering is not one of its problems. It's smokey, heats the gun up way too quickly, and you can't see the powder in the case because it doesn't take up much room and it's soot colored. It does meter well though, and it's cheap to use.

TG is probably okay in 9mm and .45 ACP, especially with jacketed bullets. I would definitely avoid it in .38 Special because a double charge looks just like a regular charge in the deep cases.

Stock up on Bullseye or Green Dot. Unique is good too, it's just kinda dirty. AA#5 should be good, but I've never tried it.

WSF is a great powder, but there's not much load data for it for some reason.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old August 14, 2020, 10:23 PM   #31
FITASC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,646
Quote:
Quote:
I've had good results with Titegroup, and like they say -"A little goes a long way" You'll get about 20% more loads.
It meters poorly and double charges are easily possible. If you factor in the cost of guns and ER visits, it's not really very cost effective to try to save money on the cheapest component of pistol reloading by using high energy low volume powders.
I have never had any issues with TG through my RCBS powder measure; works great for 9, 38, 32swl, 45
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa
FITASC is offline  
Old August 15, 2020, 12:21 AM   #32
5whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,753
As some have said, whatever powder suits your needs, is currently plentiful, and economical. Powder doesn’t seem to have taken the supply hit that primers have... yet. It’s coming though. Grafs still has a decent selection. Also, for your listed calibers there is a ton of overlap. 700x will give excellent velocity and economy in 45acp and 38 spl. It is serviceable in 9mm as well, though you won’t realize the full velocity potential of the cartridge using that powder. There are other plenty of powders too. Clays, universal, W231, TG... the world is your oyster only worrying about those 3 calibers. HS6 will work in a pinch, but won’t be optimal in 45 or 38 unless you load +p+. Other powders out there as well. I lean toward fast for caliber powder in standard pistol, largely due to economy. 700x is still $18 for a 14 ounce can (and in stock) at grafs as of today, and that will load nearly 1500 rounds of 9mm (1200 of 45). That’s about 1.2 pennies per round in powder for 9mm, and under 1.5 for .45.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018

https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946
5whiskey is offline  
Old August 15, 2020, 12:40 AM   #33
Kram
Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2019
Posts: 70
Quote:
Don't buy W231! It's horrible powder! Wretched stuff! Not even good for the flower beds. You'll hate it. If you already have some, send it to me for proper disposal. You're welcome
lol now you tell me. I bought 2 pounds yesterday...
Kram is offline  
Old August 15, 2020, 08:11 AM   #34
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,475
TG is great stuff. Accuracy is good, meters like a champ, and is economical to use. It does tend to run hot so plated, coated, or jacketed bullets are best. And if your loading regimen is good a double charge shouldn’t be a problem. I got rid of all of mine after I blew the top off my 627. Not sure about other powders and their behavior with a double charge, but TG is definitely not very forgiving. Luckily no one was hurt other than a scratch on my forehead. I’m not going to go into a lengthy explanation, but it involve a progressive loader that I was having problems with and I did something stupid. I now load on an automatic turret press for pistol and use bulkier powders and have no more issues. It took 34 years for something like this to happen and boy was it an eye opener, I’ve tightened up my safety procedures to be triple sure of things now.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old August 15, 2020, 11:13 AM   #35
greentick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 15, 2011
Location: Deep South
Posts: 261
550B reloader. I've had 2 squibs in 26yrs of reloading (about a 6-7yr break in there). Thankfully, never a double charge. I have used TG and like it. After the squibs I changed my process (twice, relearned that one after the break). If something comes off the line I leave that spot empty or clear all processes. Nothing goes back on the line.

The Inline Fabrication skylight LED helps immensely as well.
__________________
nous défions
greentick is offline  
Old August 16, 2020, 11:42 AM   #36
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,010
Another big +1 for W231.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Old August 17, 2020, 11:00 AM   #37
jimbob86
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
Quote:
This depends. I've personally never had a double charge or serious problems with metering using TG and I've been using the stuff for about a decade, to the tune of over 9,000+ rounds loaded and fired. Generally it meters to about +/- 0.2 grains out of my crappy Lee powder measure.
+/- .2gr .....on a 9mm ..... load data separation from "Start Load" to "Do NOT Exceed Load" is .3gr ..... you are going to either be below the start or above the do not exceed, depending upon what you are shooting for, quite often, with that much error, and that tiny window..... whatever, it's your hand, and your gun. Blow 'em up if ya want to....
jimbob86 is offline  
Old August 20, 2020, 10:14 AM   #38
Micro man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2014
Location: Southern Michigan
Posts: 147
Looks like W231 is crowd favorite, thanks for the input. I ordered some from Cabelas a week ago ( higher cost per pound but close enough I could pick it up and avoid hazmat fee) but 2 days later they canceled my order.
Found some @ Powder Valley ( lower cost per pound but had to pay hazmat and shipping). 4 pounds is supposed to be delivered on Saturday !
Micro man is offline  
Old August 20, 2020, 03:12 PM   #39
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,722
https://www.midsouthshooterssupply.c...inchester-1-lb
In stock and $16 Hazmat.
__________________
............
Marco Califo is offline  
Old August 20, 2020, 05:18 PM   #40
Rangerrich99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Location: Kinda near Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbob86 View Post
+/- .2gr .....on a 9mm ..... load data separation from "Start Load" to "Do NOT Exceed Load" is .3gr ..... you are going to either be below the start or above the do not exceed, depending upon what you are shooting for, quite often, with that much error, and that tiny window..... whatever, it's your hand, and your gun. Blow 'em up if ya want to....
Nearly 10,000 of them loaded and fired and never had a single issue. But thanks for your concern, it's touching Of course, I figured out a long time ago that being 0.1 grains high or low is insignificant all other things being equal. Never going to get close to damaging a modern gun being off by a tenth.

Edit: So I just looked at Hodgdon's data on 9mm LRN (115 grain), which says: 3.9-4.3 grains of TG. I use 4.1 grains, decided on that load purposefully so that even with the 0.2 grains variance I'd be within limits either way.

The other one I use is for 124 grain, which Hodgdon's has at 3.6-4.1 grains. I use 3.9 grains.

Last edited by Rangerrich99; August 20, 2020 at 05:34 PM.
Rangerrich99 is offline  
Old August 21, 2020, 10:09 PM   #41
huntinaz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2010
Location: az
Posts: 1,332
I loaded around 10k 124gr LRN with titegroup as well. Great combo

It’s a wonder 3gr of bullseye under a 148gr wadcutter was ever able to become popular as it is without everyone loading their double charges and ruining good Smith and Wessons

It’s good to know your limitations although it’s hard to imagine some of you guys ever get anything loaded at all
__________________
"When there’s lead in the air, there’s hope in the heart”- Hunter’s Proverb
"Feed me, or feed me to something. I just want to be part of the food chain." -Al Bundy
huntinaz is offline  
Old August 24, 2020, 08:44 PM   #42
Whirlwind06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 998
BE-86 has become one of my favorites for 38 and 9mm 4.2 grains with 147 grain 9mm or 158. 38 works for me.
I think I bought it during the last shortage.

I currently have,
Bullseye
Be-86
Tight group
Herco
Unique
And American select

I haven't done anything with American select yet.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Whirlwind06 is offline  
Old August 24, 2020, 09:38 PM   #43
5whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
+/- .2gr .....on a 9mm ..... load data separation from "Start Load" to "Do NOT Exceed Load" is .3gr ..... you are going to either be below the start or above the do not exceed, depending upon what you are shooting for, quite often, with that much error, and that tiny window..... whatever, it's your hand, and your gun. Blow 'em up if ya want to....
As Rangerrich said, .1 grain over max in standard 9mm, shot out of a modern +p capable pistol, when the load previously tested safe is nothing to get panties in a bunch over. It’s certainly not gonna blow your hands off. Get real, we don’t reload Willy nilly here but no one that’s been around a minute is afraid of his own shadow either.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018

https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946
5whiskey is offline  
Old August 24, 2020, 10:06 PM   #44
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
That .3gr. max can easily be within differing components and still be well within 38+P load data. One simply has to work up with their own waepon.

Lets go to the other side of the spectrum. Hornady's MAX data for my 375 RUM is well below START data from AA / Western, Hodgdons / WIN, IMR. Do I consider their START DATA to be in HANG FIRE territory? I certainly question it as it is so far below the distrubutors data.

TG max means approach with due caution. Proper care taken means you may or may not find a great load. You will find a useable load but it may or may not be to your satisfaction. The joy of the previous shortages is that we have found loads that we wouldn't have even tried in normal circumstances.
SHR970 is offline  
Old August 25, 2020, 04:16 PM   #45
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,617
Moving on to BE-86 :p

Quote:
BE-86 has become one of my favorites
I bought a # of BE-86 to work on some defense ammo with a flash suppressant. I made some 135 GDHP SB's for 38 and 357 and results were pretty good. I have since moved on to make other HP ammo; and all around, I am very pleased with it.

Flash suppressant aside, BE-86 seems to be in a good burn rate location. It's a little faster than Power Pistol; and that seems to be a sweet spot. It makes really good +P 38 Special ammo. I love the 125gn +P's I've made with it. Gonna make some more tomorrow.

I didn't intend to become fond of BE-86. I bought it just because I needed something flash suppressed. Yet, here I am really liking it too.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07319 seconds with 9 queries