December 27, 2023, 04:34 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
Prism scopes
I've been thinking of replacing a red dot with some sort of prism scope that is light weight but has some magnification. What are some options that have worked for you?
|
December 28, 2023, 01:30 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,997
|
The primary arms ones are pretty nice and are reasonably priced. Friend just got a 3x. Fantastic mounting kit that came with it. All kinds of options.
C-does did a great comparison between all the primary arms options and has individual reviews on each one as well. https://youtu.be/4fySOGoBGHs?feature=shared
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. |
December 28, 2023, 09:02 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,717
|
I have primary arms micro and Burris prism optics and they are both good quality and a decent value for the money.
Personally I like the Burris RT-3 and RT-5 slightly better than the Primary arms, but only because I like the reticle better.
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
December 28, 2023, 11:51 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,476
|
Quote:
I have several Bushnell Lil P 1x Prisms I like quite a bit. They still come up on the used market. The center dot is 2moa with a footprint about the same as a Daniel Defense fixed rear sight. With the diopter adjusted for my eye the image is actually slightly reduced from 1x, but perfectly sharp, much like looking through an aperture sight, but without the alignment issues. I can shoot precisely with it, but identifying what I am shooting isn't aided much. Atibal still sells a 1x prism in that very small format. A 1.5x optic is surprising helpful in figuring out what I am seeing, but it isn't so much magnification that my standing wobble becomes a distraction. I don't have a Primary Arms 2x prism, but I'd bet it would be good too. There are a lot of 3x prisms in the current market. If that's your choice, it seems that getting the reticle you like would be the driving consideration. Swampfox makes a 3x that is said to have an extraordinary field of view. I wonder how important that is on a rifle sight. If I'm focused on a three inch target 50 yards away with a 2 or moa dot, I don't see how the things 20 feet on either side need to be visible through my optic.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
December 28, 2023, 07:19 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
Thanks for the great advice and suggestions.
In answer to zukiphile, I'm looking for a light weight optic to go on a 16" pencil barrel 5.56 upper that I carry at the hunting land while I change camera cards during the off season or after the freezer is full during the regular season. The potential targets are coyotes and the less likely feral pig. A red dot has worked for me in the past but my eyes aren't what they used to be and I wasn't 100% on an eight inch plate at 114 yards with the red dot this last range session. It's still very easy to hit the plate when looking through a scope, even at low magnification with a 3x9 or an LPVO but I didn't perform as well as I wanted with the red dot this last time. |
December 28, 2023, 10:33 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,879
|
You can't see the target, or you can't put the shots on target? For the latter, magnification probably won't help. 8" at 100m is still much bigger than 2moa dot.
-TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
December 28, 2023, 10:43 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,444
|
My only prism is a Vortex Spitfire 5x.
I haven't had it long. But I like it. Adjustments are coarse - 1 MoA per click. But that is good enough for what I have it on - and probably your intended application. Some people think 5x is too much, and believe the 3x model is superior. But I like the magnification. Gives me enough to better identify targets, without being overbearing like 6x+ would be. I have learned a lot in the last year, having jumped into competition shooting. And I can tell you unequivocally that learning the reticle in whatever you choose to buy will be very beneficial. Know those subtensions, dots, etc. They can be very useful.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
December 29, 2023, 07:14 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
|
|
December 29, 2023, 07:15 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
Thanks for the suggestion, FrankenMauser.
|
December 29, 2023, 09:11 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,717
|
Quote:
A prism is an excellent choice for your intended purpose
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
|
December 29, 2023, 11:20 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,879
|
Quote:
I have near sight, astigmatism, and aging. Have been wearing progressive prescription lenses. It is still ok to use dot. But the ability to pick out target, especially in low light has much degraded. Prism scopes sound a good option. I quite like lpvo. -TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
|
January 4, 2024, 01:00 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,476
|
Quote:
Where someone is coming from may influence what sort of prism he likes. You are coming from a RDS with which you were happy until you though you needed a bit of help. I came from iron sights and wasn't as put off by a lack of magnification as some might be. Perhaps people coming from LPVOs would put greater emphasis on magnification and tolerate complexity better.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
January 4, 2024, 05:52 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,895
|
Burris RT3 is my all-around favorite AR sight/scope.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
January 9, 2024, 07:48 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
|
|
January 17, 2024, 06:33 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,527
|
I tried out a Primary Arms SLx 3x and was able to do much better than with the red dot. I could focus the reticle and the 3x helped me to see the plate better than with the red dot. It was easy to get hits on the plate. The weight isn't much more than a red dot but the downside is eye relief. The advantage of this optic over an LPVO is weight savings but when actually shooting, I think even a budget LPVO in the same price range like a Vortex Strike Eagle is better for me at getting hits.
|
January 18, 2024, 12:43 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,476
|
Quote:
Of course, nothing matches the eye relief of a RDS. Prisms get pickier on eye relief range as magnification increases. I have a 5x that was hard to use until I moved it a couple of picatinny notches forward. Now I like it quite a bit.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
|
|