The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 16, 2010, 04:20 PM   #1
DaveInPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 1,106
Is the Lee factory crimp die bad with lead bullets?

I'm beginning to start my journey into loading .40 S&W. I loaded some dummy rounds with 180gr lead bullets and crimped using the FCD. I pushed HARD on these rounds against my bench and got NO bullet setback.

I think I've heard people say that it's a bad idea to use the FCD with lead bullets. Is there any truth to this?
DaveInPA is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 04:34 PM   #2
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Nope. It works very well with them in handgun rounds. The Lee factory crimp for rifle works on a different principle, squeezing the brass inward with a collet, and I suppose that could damage a hard enough cast bullet under some circumstances. Perhaps that's what you heard mentioned?
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 05:50 PM   #3
Peter M. Eick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,991
Well, it depends, sort of like most things in life.

Here is how you figure out if you have a problem (and from your description, I think you might).

Take a piece of brass, resize it and set it aside. Take a new lead bullet. Mike it out so you know how big it is. Take your time, do it accurately. Write the number down.

Seat the bullet in the resized brass end then mike the top most edge of the brass right where it just about goes to the bullet. Write the number down.

Resize it in the FCD.

Measure the brass, right at the junction to the bullet. Write that number down.

Pull the bullet out and remeasure it. Write that number down.

Now compare the size of the bullet before and after FCD-ing. I bet it changed, probably a lot. If so you have a problem and the FCD is probably not helping your groups much. The only way to know for sure is load up 50 with the fcd and 50 without and try it. I saw that with my guns, the FCD was adding 2 o 3" to my 15 yrds groups in the 45 acp and 9mm.

I find the worst offenders are starline brass and lead bullets.


Now why you ask?

Consider the problem if YOU had to engineer the sizer ring. What would you do? You have to pick a inside diameter of the ring, might as well pick it so it is about halfway through the average thickness of the brass from most manufacturers. Thus thick brass gets sized, thin brass does not. Lead bullets are normally thicker then jacketed. Lead gets sized, jacketed do not.

For this reason the FCD's have generally been banished from my loading bench. I bought them early on, experimented and gave up on most of them. The 357 sig is the one exception. Works great in the sig.

Remember your mileage may vary. Test and verify anything read on the net.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 06:19 PM   #4
wncchester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
"I think I've heard people say that it's a bad idea to use the FCD with lead bullets. Is there any truth to this?"

All the pistol FCD does differently is make sure any ammo you use it on will chamber. But, I've learned to like that!
wncchester is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 06:35 PM   #5
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave..
I'm beginning to start my journey into loading .40 S&W. I loaded some dummy rounds with 180gr lead bullets and crimped using the FCD. I pushed HARD on these rounds against my bench and got NO bullet setback.
Pat yourself on the back; you have achieved success. That is exactly the test I use when setting up to load any auto-pistol round.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 06:47 PM   #6
CrustyFN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
I don't load 40 but I do use a FCD for 9mm and 45 auto using lead. I have done as Peter suggested. I seated some bullets and then ran them into the FCD without crimping. Every bullet measured the same after it was pulled as it did before it was seated. I think the post sizing ring makes a great case gage. If I feel a round get post sized then I set it to the side and inspect it. If I'm not happy with it when I inspect it then I pull it and reuse the components.
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded.
CrustyFN is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 07:08 PM   #7
Sam06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 1,086
No the FCD is a good die. The lyman M Die is a good choice also with cast bullets.
__________________
The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
Sam06 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 07:48 PM   #8
oif-vet
Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Fort Bliss, Texas
Posts: 24
I use the Lee FCD exclusively with all my lead bullets. No issues. Good and accurate ammo with a light crimp.
__________________
RRA AR-15, SA Custom Mil-Spec 1911, XD-45 Compact, Ruger P90
oif-vet is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 09:51 PM   #9
SL1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
Be advised that not all FCDs have the exact same carbide ring diameter. I got one in .44 that was slightly sizing FACTORY jacketed bullet loads. Lee said it must be one of the "tight" ones.

SO, you really need to check what YOURS is doing to YOUR bullets.

If you are doing everything else properly, you really don't need the pistol version of the FCD (with the cabide ring). I have quite using the ring in the crimp stage. I use the crimp internals for the .44 in a .45 die body, so I get the crimp without any posibility of sizing the case. (I also use the .44 FCD body to initially size my cases, and then size with the regular carbide sizer just down to slightly below where the bullet will seat.)

SL1
SL1 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:13 PM   #10
CrustyFN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
Quote:
If you are doing everything else properly, you really don't need the pistol version of the FCD
I never really understood that statement. If you are doing everything right you don't need any separate crimp die. I guess there are a lot of us that like to separate the seating from the crimping.
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded.
CrustyFN is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:17 PM   #11
rbernie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', TX
Posts: 713
Quote:
I think I've heard people say that it's a bad idea to use the FCD with lead bullets. Is there any truth to this?
Not in my experience, and I've loaded and shot tens and tens of thousands of cast loads in all sorts of pistol and revolver chamberings.

Quote:
I guess there are a lot of us that like to separate the seating from the crimping.
I'm certainly one of those kind of folk.
__________________
-A conclusion is not a destination, it's simply a convenient place to stop thinking.-
-Reading a thing doesn't automatically make it so; repeating it doesn't necessarily make it any truer.-
-Every Texan should be a member of the Texas State Rifle Association.
rbernie is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:31 PM   #12
SL1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
CrustyFN wrote:

Quote:
Quote:
If you are doing everything else properly, you really don't need the pistol version of the FCD

I never really understood that statement. If you are doing everything right you don't need any separate crimp die. I guess there are a lot of us that like to separate the seating from the crimping.
What I was trying to say was that you don't need the CARBIDE RING in a FCD if you have all of your other dies set-up properly, because it wouldn't be doing anything useful. That is not to say that using a separate crimp die isn't a good idea. The crimp die just doesn't need a carbide ring in it. So, you can use pretty much anybody's crimp die in the last step. The actual crimping part of Lee's FCD isn't a bad design, and (as I already wrote above) I use that for my .44s with an oversize (.45) ring so that it does NOT do any sizing when I crimp (in a separate operation from seating).

SL1
SL1 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 11:17 PM   #13
RidgwayCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2008
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 244
I've gotten rid of all my handgun FCDs and replaced them with regular taper crimp and roll crimp dies.

Just as an example, I recently noticed that the FCD die was doing a LOT of post-sizing on my .380 Auto rounds when using both jacketed and lead bullets. So after loading some rounds normally, I pulled a couple of bullets of each type to check bullet diameters. The Hornady 100gr FMJ-Encapsulated bullets had been sized from .355" down to .354", and the 95gr LRN bullets had been sized from .356" down to .353". Sorry, but that kind of reduction in bullet diameter is unacceptable to me... YMMV.
__________________
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Nope, not a single word about hunting...
RidgwayCO is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 11:52 PM   #14
DaveInPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 1,106
I pulled the pullets from the dummy rounds and there was no reduction in diameter.
DaveInPA is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 07:25 AM   #15
RNG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 120
DaveInPa wrote:
Quote:
I think I've heard people say that it's a bad idea to use the FCD with lead bullets. Is there any truth to this?
It depends on a couple of factors.

.40 S&W has a diameter of .400. Nominal .40 brass wall thickness is .010.

.400 + .010 + .010 = .420

The Lee FCD will size to .420. Not a problem with .400 jacketed bullets.

To help reduce leading when shooting lead boolits we typically size .001 over bore diameter. With respect to .40 we size to .401.

.401 + .010 + .010 = .421

Using the Lee FCD will size to .420 thus reducing the lead boolit to .400 which COULD promote leadiing in the barrel. The bigger problem here is that depending on the alloy used, crimping the .401 to .400 (.421 to .420) case neck tension may not be retained causing the boolit to become loose in the case. This wouldn't be a problem with setback since a "lip" would have been created when the boolit was reduced to .420 but may promote leading and reduce accuracy.

If you're using the FCD, are able to maintain accuracy without serious leading, and case neck tension isn't a problem, then I'd say you're may be ok but proceed with caution.

YMMV -

DaveInPa wrote:
Quote:
I pulled the pullets from the dummy rounds and there was no reduction in diameter.
Just curious, are your boolits .400 or .401?




Warmest Regards,
Richard
__________________
__________________________________________________________
Kimbers are what you show your friends. Glocks are what you show your enemies.

Last edited by RNG; January 17, 2010 at 07:31 AM. Reason: Added a question.
RNG is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 08:08 AM   #16
DaveInPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 1,106
They're .400 according to my calipers. I think my calipers are pretty accurate since they read a jacketed .223 Remington bullet at .224.
DaveInPA is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 08:59 AM   #17
RNG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 120
At .400 I would watch for leading.

Cheers,
Richard
__________________
__________________________________________________________
Kimbers are what you show your friends. Glocks are what you show your enemies.
RNG is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 09:50 AM   #18
Sam06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 1,086
Ditto

A 40 S&W bullet should be sized larger than .400, I would think you whould want them to be about .403.

I would watch for leading also.
__________________
The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
Sam06 is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 09:58 AM   #19
DaveInPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 1,106
A .40 S&W bullets sized to .403?
DaveInPA is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 10:21 AM   #20
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,546
If you are loading mixed brass with bulk cast bullets, the CFC die has a place. After all, if it won't go in the chamber, it won't shoot at all.

If you worry about distortion of the bullet hurting accuracy, then you ought to be using better components that do not need any help chambering.

If you find that you are distorting the bullets so badly that the bullet pull is reduced and setback becomes more likely, then you should not use the CFC die.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old January 17, 2010, 11:21 AM   #21
mtnbkr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2000
Location: Manassas, Virginia
Posts: 914
Quote:
I bet it changed, probably a lot. If so you have a problem and the FCD is probably not helping your groups much.
Quote:
Just as an example, I recently noticed that the FCD die was doing a LOT of post-sizing on my .380 Auto rounds when using both jacketed and lead bullets. So after loading some rounds normally, I pulled a couple of bullets of each type to check bullet diameters. The Hornady 100gr FMJ-Encapsulated bullets had been sized from .355" down to .354", and the 95gr LRN bullets had been sized from .356" down to .353". Sorry, but that kind of reduction in bullet diameter is unacceptable to me...

I did an experiment recently. I used 3 Oregon Trail 240gr SWC bullets and one piece of PMC 44mag brass (same case for both loaded round tests). The SWCs are advertised as being .431. They mic out to .431-.431x (not quite .432).

I loaded one bullet but didn't run it through the crimp die. I pulled the bullet with a kinetic puller and measured it. It measured .430x-.431.

I loaded another bullet and ran it through the crimp stage with the crimping portions removed (just using the sizing ring). I pulled the bullet and measured it. It too measured .430x-.431. It also took several firm whacks to remove the bullet.

My testing indicates no effect from the FCD on bullet diameter with PMC brass. It might do something with thicker brass. As you can see above, merely seating the bullet in sized brass has more of an effect on bullet diameter.

Chris
mtnbkr is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 11:25 AM   #22
mtnbkr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2000
Location: Manassas, Virginia
Posts: 914
Quote:
Be advised that not all FCDs have the exact same carbide ring diameter. I got one in .44 that was slightly sizing FACTORY jacketed bullet loads. Lee said it must be one of the "tight" ones.

SO, you really need to check what YOURS is doing to YOUR bullets.
Entire possible. It never hurts to confirm what your dies are doing. I've considered getting a 45 FCD and putting the 44 guts in it, but it wouldn't have any effect given my current set up.

Chris
mtnbkr is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 11:29 AM   #23
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
My testing indicates no effect from the FCD on bullet diameter with PMC brass. It might do something with thicker brass....
I load lead SWC's in .40 S&W range pick-ups. I crimp the hell out of them with the LEE FCD to insure that regardless of the neck thickness, they all get a good tight crimp.

I haven't pulled any bullets and measured them, because they're feeding like butter and shooting under 4" at 50 yards for five shots. I kinda suspect that bullet diameter isn't being negatively affected by my crimping operation.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 11:40 AM   #24
mtnbkr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2000
Location: Manassas, Virginia
Posts: 914
The only reason I checked it was threads like this. I wanted to see for myself what was going on. I could feel the carbide sizer pressing against the loaded cartridge, but found through measurement it wasn't doing anything. I was more surprised to learn the brass sized the bullet so much.

Chris
mtnbkr is offline  
Old January 17, 2010, 11:53 AM   #25
RidgwayCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2008
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 244
Quote:
If you worry about distortion of the bullet hurting accuracy, then you ought to be using better components that do not need any help chambering.
And that's exactly why I stopped using the FCD. My components are just fine, and my rounds don't need to be post-sized in order to chamber. But with the FCD, in order to get a light taper crimp required to remove the case flare, I also had to accept the case post-sizing...

So if I didn't want or need the post-sizing, why not just use a taper crimp die?
__________________
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Nope, not a single word about hunting...
RidgwayCO is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08649 seconds with 8 queries