|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 23, 2024, 10:26 AM | #51 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,855
|
PzGren - that's amazing.
Glocks are simple firearms and sometimes the simpler the better. Glock's timing was good too. HK had polymer framed handguns in the '70s before Glock. It didn't catch on. The design of the Glock is very much like the older 25 ACP pistols in that they were striker fired. Not that striker fire is anything new. Rifles of the late 19th Century used it as did the P-08 Parabellum.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
April 23, 2024, 11:13 AM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,018
|
Prior to sales
Prior to moving to sales a good many years ago, I did a lot of engineering. I came to realize there is a LOT more recompense in the sales game. However my passion is engineering.
There is not one reason the Glock products are reliable, there are several. In my opinion I would rate the reasons for their reliability thus. 1. Simplicity. Fewer parts means fewer part failures. 2. Design. Reliable, because of the simplicity. 3. Materials. Appropriate for purpose and of high quality. I contend that if the above three items happen, the rest takes care of itself. I am a fan of Glock, others come and go from my accumulation, my Gen3 19 was purchased when Gen 3 was new.
__________________
ricklin Freedom is not free |
April 26, 2024, 02:52 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 339
|
|
|
|