November 16, 2008, 10:23 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2002
Location: Georgia, 35 miles Northwest of the armpit
Posts: 946
|
45/70 and big bears.
I think that we all agree, the 45/70 will kill any animal in North America. In Georgia, for sure. But, has anyone ever depended on one for grizzlies, or polar bears, or kodiak bears, as a defense or for hunting?
If in the situation, would you feel that you had enough gun? Is it really used that much in Alaska? How much of its name is marketing technique, and how much is function? I can only speculate, I'd like to hear from those in the know. - Best
__________________
The Terminator John 3:16 (I hope to see You over there.) |
November 16, 2008, 11:28 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
|
I gave this a lot of speculation myself when I was planning my spring (black) bear hunt last year. In the end I didn't take my Marlin 1895 because it's just too much gun for blackies, has problems with trajectory over 250 yards and I couldn't maintain acceptable offhand shooting accuracy due to its recoil profile. (It kicks like being hit by Fred Sanford's 2x4 that he keeps behind the door soaking in a can of motor oil.) From what I've read it might have difficulties in the immediate lethality department if a person was not able to hit a big animal in exactly the right spot. But it would be probably pretty good for close range defense if a person was fishing in bear country. All this, except my exerience trying to overcome the trajectory and recoil problems, is speculation...sorry.
You might want to send a PM to Wildalaska, one of the forum members who manages a gun store in Alaska and who sells a lot of guns to bear hunters. He asserts a number of years experience listening to gun complaints from real bear hunters, knowing which guns they complain the least about.
__________________
In a few years when the dust finally clears and people start counting their change there is a pretty good chance that President Obama may become known as The Great Absquatulator. You heard it first here on TFL. |
November 16, 2008, 02:29 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
The .45-70 will kill big bears.
If you're concerned about the charging grizzly that seems to magically appear at twenty yards on this board, then you might consider a 12 gauge slug gun. |
November 16, 2008, 04:17 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
The 45-70 would be fine for bears. You can dern near load them to 458 Win specs in the right rifle, but thats not really necessary.
Figure it out, the 338 win mag, its quite popular for big bears in Alaska, the 300 grn 45-70 in a marlin shoot it about as fast. Dont know if I'd complain much about the trejectory, lots of buffalo were killed with them at 1000 yards or such. I spent 22 years in alaska, in bear country I carried a 375 H&H, but the only bear I killed was with a 7mm Rem Mag.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
November 18, 2008, 12:13 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2008
Location: Fort Yukon, Alaska
Posts: 735
|
I would take a 45-70 with good loads before any 12 guage slug. I am not sure what the fascination with slugs for bear is, but I am not aware of any slug that will penetrate like a good rifle bullet. The Alaska Wildlife Troopers are given rifles (usually .338s but my buddy was given a .350 Rem Mag)for solving bear issues instead of using the department issued 870 12 guage. The Troopers use Brenneke slugs (one of the best penetrating slugs) in their 870s but have found that rifles work better.
|
November 18, 2008, 12:36 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2008
Location: Fort Yukon, Alaska
Posts: 735
|
To answer another question, the 45-70 is fairly popular up here. I see a lot of them and I have one but have not killed a grizzly with it, my favorite bear rifle is the .35 Whelen. I believe that most grizzlies killed up here are killed with calibers that a lot of out of state hunters would consider inadequate. The 30-30, 308, 270, 30-06 are used extensively by many native and rural dwelling Alaskans to kill scores of bears. I personally know of more than one grizzly done in with .223, as well as 7.62 x 39. Standard calibers far outnumber magnums in Bush Alaska. I handload for my 45-70 and am getting 2100 FPS with 400 grain bullet. I am sure that when I get the chance to shoot a bear with this rifle it will do the job easily.
|
November 18, 2008, 01:02 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2006
Posts: 206
|
Love that caliber, recoil not that bad. Use it in my Pedersoli Sharps!
|
November 18, 2008, 01:08 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,655
|
All the bears I've killed has been with 12 ga Brenneke slugs and one with a .375.
The Brennekes have been complete pass throughs. I suspect that a 405+ gr from a .45-70 would whistle right through with less effort than the Brennekes. The .45-70 and its Marlin based magnum derivitives are becoming more popular here. WA can probably tell you how many .457 WWGs are going out the door.
__________________
Stop Allowing Our Schools To Be Soft Targets! http://fastersaveslives.org/ East Moose. Wear Wolf. |
January 25, 2009, 07:09 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Posts: 1
|
big bears
Agree with Kraig above - the 338 win mag is used alot in Alaska but your 45-70 would be fine as well.
__________________
"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good" -- George Washington Shooting Star, Big Bear |
January 25, 2009, 07:26 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Back in Wyoming
Posts: 1,125
|
Check this out...
http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...kodiak+island"
A Kodiak Island Bear/Deer hunt report. The weapon was a Marlin Guide Gun (45-70). I personally know several people who choose this same rifle as a packin around in bear country gun. Just make sure you roll your own or buy the Garrett/Cor-Bon/Buffalo Bore ammo, the other factory stuff is made for the old trap door rifles (weak). Last edited by wyobohunter; January 25, 2009 at 07:33 PM. |
January 25, 2009, 07:35 PM | #11 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildextremelypopularAlaska TM |
|
January 25, 2009, 07:40 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Back in Wyoming
Posts: 1,125
|
Oops
guess terminator has already seen that link, considering he replied to it
|
January 25, 2009, 07:46 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: Florida, east coast
Posts: 2,106
|
The 45-70 was the darling of the buffalo hunters, about the same size as a large bear. I've seen films where they just dropped where they were standing.
My experience is limited to an 1873 Trapdoor, the vernier sight goes to 1200 yds. I've shot it at 1K. Other than being able to take a nap between pulling the trigger and the bullet arriving on target it's pretty impressive. An ounce is 437.5 gr., OTC cartridges are 405 or 500 gr. In general you're throwing an ounce of lead, that's got to hurt something. The black bear that I shot rolled over and played dead on the spot. I'll swear that the deer was lifted off of it's feet, never did that again. More info here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.45-70
__________________
NRA Patron Member |
January 25, 2009, 10:19 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
|
|
January 25, 2009, 10:35 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 24, 2004
Posts: 394
|
duh
most buffalo hunters used 44-77, .44-90, .50-70, and .50-90.
the 45-70 was not used much by professional hunters till after 1876. This brings us to another bit of legend--that buffalo hunters regularly shot beasts at ranges such as 1,000 yards. That's pure horse-pucky! Target shooters of the era did compete at such enormous ranges but not the bison hunters. They were businessmen, and flinging lead around the countryside wasted it and powder and primers, all of which had to be freighted to them from railheads in mule or ox-drawn wagons. In short, components were expensive. A little research reveals professional hide hunters made their "stands" at more reasonable ranges up to a few hundred yard. steve |
January 26, 2009, 10:57 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 885
|
Quote:
To stay with the time frame, the only recorded and verified re:surveyed long shot of the day was on a Comanche Indian shot in the back at 1069yds by a buff hunter named Billy Dixon at the Battle of Adobe Walls. Definitely impressive w/ blackpowder, however A 7-8in thick man as opposed to a 30in buff chest w/ 1/2in of hide plus hair on him. Totally different situation. Now before the naysayers remind me that this was also a Louis Lamour book, it was based in fact. Also, the raid by the Indians was led by none other than my wife's g.g.g grandfather,,Quanah Parker...Last Comanch Indian chief. died in 1911 elkman06
__________________
"The right of the citizens to bear arms in the defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied." Wyoming Constitution Article 1, Sec24 "Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6" |
|
January 26, 2009, 11:21 AM | #17 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildnativeamericanhistoryisoneofmyhobbiesAlaska TM |
|
February 8, 2009, 09:48 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,519
|
So does this mean...
I can use my Original Contender with rifle stock & 45-70 barrel for Alaskan bear?
Getting a 30/30 barrel for sure for deer, maybe consider rechambering for the 30-40 Karg round uses heavier bullet 220gr. |
February 9, 2009, 07:55 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
February 9, 2009, 02:28 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." - General George Patton Jr |
|
February 13, 2009, 05:44 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: January 13, 2009
Posts: 30
|
Go to Garretts cartridge co.s web site and read of a guy who went to Africa and killed the big 6 with a Marlin 1895 in 45/70. most were killed with one shot with a safety second shot (usual in Africa from what I hear)
I believe, Elephant, hippo, buffalo,lion,......can't remember the rest. If it will do a hippo I think with the right cartridge and hard cast bullet it will take the big bears. JMHO. Jimbow. |
February 13, 2009, 05:56 PM | #22 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: East Bay NorCal, People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 5,866
|
There is a difference between kill and stop. Since I know the .475 and .500 JRH, with 420-440 grain bullets will go through 5-6 feet of buffalo, and they work about the same as a .375 H&H, the 45-70, loaded to similar specs is going to do the same.
The problem arises when people try and say the 45-70 is a 'stopper'. It's not. There is a sizeable difference between a 400 and 500 grain bullets on game, just as there is a huge difference between 600 grains and 500 grains. The main appeal of the 45-70 is the light guns you can carry it in. Likewise, the 458 Win Mag can be had in some lightweight rifles as well. Given the choice, I'd rather be using a soft point designed for dangerous game, weighing 500 grains, then a cast bullet. |
February 13, 2009, 07:31 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2007
Location: OBX, NC
Posts: 1,128
|
In any modern rifle that is as strong as a Marlin, you can load the 45/70 to power levels similar to the early British elephant cartridges. In a 6 1/2 lb rifle, recoil is strong, but when hunting, you won't notice it and you won't shoot that many times. It's the sighting in that will get you!
__________________
“If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.” Ronald Reagan I'm a proud member of a North Carolina Committee of Safety |
February 13, 2009, 07:52 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
http://www.garrettcartridges.com/500gr.asp If the price wasn't so steep, I'd buy a box for the No. 1 just to see how it shot.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
February 14, 2009, 07:50 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: January 13, 2009
Posts: 30
|
From Garretts page on the 45/70
"Owing to this ability, the 45-70 provides a degree of lethality not generally found with other calibers, even ones producing much greater power. This is best evidenced by comparisons with the mighty 458 Winchester Magnum. As conventionally loaded with 500-grain expanding bullets, the 458 is notorious for its relatively shallow penetration. Consequently, when really heavy game is hunted, it is quite common for roundnose solids to be used. Unfortunately, roundnose solids tend to be slow to incapacitate big game. By comparison, the 45-70 can be loaded with blunt non-expanding hard-cast bullets that produce much deeper penetration than the 458 with expanding bullets, and cut a much larger wound channel than the 458 with roundnose solids. Also, the speed of incapacitation is much faster with a blunt non-expanding bullet than with any roundnose solid. Simply stated, proper hard-cast bullets effectively split the difference between under-penetrative expanding bullets and the slow to incapacitate roundnose solids.
The only significant limitation of the 45-70 is the 200-yard trajectory. However, within that range, the 45-70 can anchor the heaviest game on the planet with brutal authority. It can shoot lengthwise through the heaviest game animal including buffalo with large caliber blunt bullets, giving the shooter the advantage of not having to pass on bad-angle shots. If the bull of a lifetime is headed straight away from the shooter and the seat of the pants shot is all that is offered, the shooter can take the shot and know that he will reach the vitals. Generally, when proper hard-cast bullets are used, lengthwise shots result in exit wounds. If confronted by a heavy coastal grizzly hell-bent on annihilation, the 45-70 lever-gun will reliably shoot lengthwise through the bear, while providing the quickest action type available, the lever-action, should a rapid follow-up shot be required. This exceptional combination of action speed and impact effect is impossible to beat when the skirmish is close, and the game is dangerous. And as it turns out, the caliber is also capable of outstanding accuracy, on the order of MOA. If I could own only one big game rifle, it would certainly be a 45-70 lever-gun."(This was from Garretts website) I agree with the above statement. Go to their website and read of the man who went to Africa. GREAT read. Jimbow1965 |
|
|