The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 19, 2017, 12:09 PM   #1
Carmady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,736
Power Pistol vs HP-38 for lead .380acp, .38SP, .45ACP

During the shortage I stocked up on Power Pistol because it was either that or nothing, and it had been nothing for a couple/few years.

Now HP-38 is on the shelves, and I was wondering if it's a more suitable powder for what I'm loading, which is:

95gr L-RN for .380ACP
158gr L-SWC for .38 SPL & .357
200gr L-SWC for .45ACP

with max velocities well below 1000fps. Looking for similar recoil/feel to regular FMJ rounds for practice.

Barrel lengths:
.380 2.75"
.38 2"
.45 5"

Would HP-38 be better enough (if at all) to make it worth getting some?
Carmady is offline  
Old February 19, 2017, 12:32 PM   #2
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
I was advised to use Power Pistol in the 9mm by David Sams, who built my Bullseye Pistol M92 Berretta. That is the powder he got best accuracy with 115 gr FMJ's. And I can say, it shoots fine.

HP-38 is the same powder as W231, of which I have shot kegs of the stuff in the 45 ACP. This powder is well characterized and very flexible in a wide number of pistol cartridges. I have tried it from 32 S&W Long up to the 45 L Colt. It works well and meters well. It was a staple for the 45 ACP.

So, I would recommend just trying it. But if the question is one powder "better" than the other, I cannot say. HP-38 has been around for a very long time, Power Pistol is relatively new, though it may be just a different burn rate Bullseye. Only time will tell, in our very crowded powder market, whether one is all that better than another.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old February 19, 2017, 01:00 PM   #3
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
Power Pistol is fantastic for high pressure, full-spec pistol rounds. Great in 9mm, .40 S&W and 10mm for sure.

Yes, can be used other places... if you want to make a .45 JHP load that runs to the end of it's ability, Power Pistol will work.

But I do have to agree that HP-38/W231 is definitely better suited to .38 and .45 loads, normal loads and typical "WWB" or hardball loads.

I say either is fine, if I were in your shoes... I would buy the HP-38 and use it. Good idea.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old February 19, 2017, 01:05 PM   #4
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,458
I use Power Pistol in all your rounds, with the exception of .357 Mag. However, the only one running lead is the .38 Special. PP works very well for me there, so I haven't tried HP-38, although I have some on hand. Would it work better for low velocity lead? Me, I'd give it a try. It is certainly an appropriate application, and a big reason I reload is to experiment. If I didn't have a planned load list in front of me, I'd try some today. Buy a pound of HP-38 and have fun. It won't go to waste.
ligonierbill is offline  
Old February 19, 2017, 01:41 PM   #5
Carmady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,736
Thanks for the replies. I'll try some.
Carmady is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03764 seconds with 8 queries