|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 16, 2014, 12:33 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2014
Posts: 3
|
Out of state firearm transfer/purchase
I have a question about a Remmington 870 I purchased;
About two months ago I was up in Alaska visiting some friends for the week and had purchased a shotgun to use while I was up there. The reason for the purchase was my belief that I would be living up there by now for a job I thought I was going to take and I would just retrieve my shotgun then when I officially moved up there and got my own place.. When I returned home to the midwest a week later I received a better job offer and am no longer going to move to Alaska. However, my friend said he would purchase the gun off of me and we could transfer my name from the gun to his. The problem arose when I started researching all this and transferring weapons and to me it looks like it isnt possible from one state to another? only in state..? If I am correct on that, then is it a different circumstance since the gun is still at his house and all we would have to do is transfer the name over and pay the $? If the transfer is not possible at all I will just have him ship the gun to me and I will keep it, but since he wants it I am just trying to figure out the best action. Any help with this issue would be appreciated! Thanks |
December 16, 2014, 02:33 PM | #2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
When you purchased the gun, did you use an ID and address from AK, or from the unnamed Midwestern state? FWIW here's the definition of "residence" according to federal law, 27 CFR § 478.11 specifically, my emphasis underlined: Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; December 16, 2014 at 02:39 PM. Reason: question added |
||
December 16, 2014, 03:08 PM | #3 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Even though it never left the state. Yeah, it's silly. I would contact a dealer in Alaska and ask how they'd like to proceed. Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
December 16, 2014, 03:19 PM | #4 | ||||||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
I'm afraid that you have a major and complicated problem. The transfer of possession of a gun by a resident of one State to a resident of another is heavily regulated under federal law.
The federal laws relating to the transfer of a gun from a resident of one State to a resident of another are about mere physical possession, not just ownership. Giving someone your gun to store for you will be considered a transfer. It certainly is under federal law, and would also most likely be also considered a transfer under state laws. That's just what "transfer" means.
So the first problem was the OP, a resident of State B, leaving his gun behind in State A with a resident of State A. That was a transfer [of possession] of a gun from a resident of one State to a resident of another. Now the OP is in kind of a pickle. If he wants the gun back, the best way to arrange that legally would be for his friend in Alaska to ship the gun to a cooperating FFL in the OP's state of residence and have the gun formally transferred. That's cumbersome and seems silly, but I really don't see any other way. Among other things, it would be a violation of federal law for the OP's Alaskan friend to ship the gun directly to the OP in a different State.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||||||
December 16, 2014, 04:52 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2014
Posts: 3
|
Frank, so technically what needs to be done is either what you replied with as to have him ship the gun to an FFL and have the gun transferred there, or I guess I could end up keeping the gun by going back there and bringing back the gun with me?
That is the only last option I see. Wish I would have known the whole possession issue wasnt such a large problem as I would have simply just brought it back with me... How much does a FFL transfer cost? |
December 16, 2014, 05:28 PM | #6 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
First, understand that at this point there's no good answer. The least bad answer is to have your friend ship the gun to an FFL local to you to do the transfer. What an FFL will charge will be up to him. So you might want to shop around.
For information on shipping see here.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
December 16, 2014, 05:43 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
I don't think the gun has to be "shipped" anywhere. If I understand the OP's question, it is already in the possession of the intended buyer (in AK). If that is indeed the case, it is only a matter making arrangments with an FFL that is nearby to that friend and letting him do the transfer.
|
December 16, 2014, 05:44 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 285
|
All good advise. I would still contact a dealer in Alaska.
I would ask them if they can do a sale to your friend. Even if they as a dealer buy it from on paper and sell it to your friend in order to clean up the paper. Going by the letter of the law is sometimes an issue. I am not advocating anything else, but a local dealer may and in all likelihood be able to assist you greatly. Mel |
December 16, 2014, 05:50 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
December 16, 2014, 06:06 PM | #10 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
December 16, 2014, 06:18 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
|
|
December 16, 2014, 06:19 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2014
Posts: 3
|
Wish this was much easier, looks like a may be taking another vacation up there and grabbing my gun or possibly having my friend ship the gun to a ffl down here in the midwest.. which doesnt seem to be quite legal
Anyways, thanks for the help here everyone. I hope no one else runs into an issue like this! |
December 16, 2014, 07:07 PM | #13 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
As I mentioned earlier, there are no good answers. We started out in a hole with no really clear, good way out. In any case, it looks like the OP knows the score and should be able to work things out from here. And further discussion might well just make things worse. So I'm going to close this off now.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
|
|