The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 17, 2016, 10:18 AM   #1
RiponP90
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2016
Posts: 190
Shooting a Springfield Model 1873

So I have a beautiful Springfield Model 1873 that has been in the family for probably 70 some odd years now. The story behind it is that my grandfather went to a rummage sale once and bought it when he was 11 (I know right?) with the intent of turning it into a lamp. Thank God he didn't. It has been hanging over my entryway now for years.

My question is that do you think it would be right to take it to a gunsmith to have it looked over to see if it is safe to shoot? If it is do you think I should enjoy a part of history by putting a few 45-70 rounds through it or should I enjoy it from afar and preserve its beauty?

I'm not a C&R collector so I'm looking to you guys for advice that know more about this.

EDIT: Pictures







__________________
Proud PS90 SBR and SPAS 12 Owner
www.plinkersclub.com Your source for target, hunting and self defense ammunition.

Last edited by RiponP90; January 17, 2016 at 05:19 PM.
RiponP90 is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 12:31 PM   #2
Tidewater_Kid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 925
Pictures would help us to judge condition. You can have it checked by a gunsmith. Remington makes a load for these old rifles, but they use a jacketed bullet which is not good for the barrel. A few rounds will not hurt it and that's how I got my first brass to reload. I don't shoot anything in mine now but lead bullets and black powder. They are fun rifles to shoot and I think you would enjoy it.

TK
Tidewater_Kid is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 12:52 PM   #3
gtodan
Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2004
Posts: 34
By all means get it checked out and shoot it.

There is loaded ammo out there for it. Lead bullets, brass, blackpowder/GOEX.

I bought a handloader rig for mine. Can load rounds at the range.

I prefer the 600 grain lead bullets. The 405 grain was used in the carbine.

I read some test data when the rifle was first released. Used a thousand yard range setup on a beach on the east coast. Routinely shot 600 yards with it.

Send me a PM with an email and I will send you some links.

This thread is worthless without pics!
gtodan is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 12:56 PM   #4
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
By all means take it to a competent gunsmith for inspection.

As far as firing it goes, get it looked at first. The smith may be able to supply you with a few light loads.

As an aside, your rifle is an antique. Treat it like one. Using commercial loads in them is alright, but consistent firing does work things loose or break parts, they may be expensive to locate and replace.

So do use light handloads. You can buy a Lee loader kit for about $25 and load up your own shells for a song.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 02:13 PM   #5
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
Had an original TD Carbine about 35 years ago. Shot it without fuss in my Great BP Cartridge Experiment(no internet for research in those days. Not many books either.). Traded it to a buddy and he was shooting it with smokeless loads with no fuss.
"...The 405 grain was used in the carbine..." Yep. And the rifle. Absolutely not 70 grains of BP in a Carbine though. Carbines used 55 grains of BP.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 04:41 PM   #6
RiponP90
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2016
Posts: 190
Sorry haha I should have uploaded pics! I'll update with pics soon! I wasn't thinking. I really do think it would be fun to shoot which is why I had to ask but I didn't want to be the guy that has an original coke bottle and opens it to drink it just for fun so to speak.
__________________
Proud PS90 SBR and SPAS 12 Owner
www.plinkersclub.com Your source for target, hunting and self defense ammunition.
RiponP90 is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 05:34 PM   #7
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
When you take it in for inspection, have the smith give it a good cleaning and lubrication, looks like it needs it. Appears to have a pin missing from the right hand sideplate, be sure to mention that to the smith.

Don't sand the wood or anything.

Wipe the metal down with a gun rag.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 05:47 PM   #8
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
While we're on the subject, my local pawn shop has an M1868 .50-70 trapdoor for sale. If anyone is interested, PM me and I will give you contact info.
__________________
As always, YMMV.
__________________________________________
MIIAA
SIFE
gyvel is offline  
Old January 17, 2016, 06:06 PM   #9
RiponP90
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2016
Posts: 190
Don't tempt me haha. If only I had the money for that right now.
__________________
Proud PS90 SBR and SPAS 12 Owner
www.plinkersclub.com Your source for target, hunting and self defense ammunition.
RiponP90 is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 05:41 AM   #10
l.cutler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2005
Posts: 275
The hole in the lockplate is where the mainspring pivots, the spring pivot pin should be visible in the hole. Definitely have it looked at and see what is wrong, may be nothing, may need to be repaired.
l.cutler is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 02:28 PM   #11
RiponP90
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2016
Posts: 190
Thanks for the input guys. The shop is open tomorrow so I'll take it in then. It will probably take a week or two but I'll let you know what they say. If it is good to shoot I'll try to get a video and post it!
__________________
Proud PS90 SBR and SPAS 12 Owner
www.plinkersclub.com Your source for target, hunting and self defense ammunition.
RiponP90 is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 09:35 PM   #12
sgms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2010
Location: Arizona or Ohio depending
Posts: 1,021
Check www.trapdoorcollector.com and go to the shooter page and do a bit of reading. some good info. there.
sgms is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 09:56 PM   #13
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
I don't have a picture of mine to show. As long as the action, barrel, are not rusted through, not been exposed to extreme heat, part numbers match up between breech block and barrel, a first order examination would indicate that it ought to be OK with black powder equivalent loads.

I ran a test of greased bullets to test the veracity of the US Army claims that grease pinches the bullet, dangerously raises pressures, and dangerously raises bolt thrust. I found all the claims to be totally unsupported and have concluded, the claims are false, are an example of Army incompetence, and a coverup of Army incompetence. This is the results of shooting my M1873 trapdoor with greased bullets. These 45/70 cases were heavily greased well below the bullet by dipping and twisting in a can of lubriplate AA130.



The first cartridge to be fired is in the left picture, and a greased, fired case is in the right. Notice how much grease is in the action after a number of these heavily greased rounds have been fired. Instead of grease pinching the bullet, it migrates back into the action. This is a primary claim by the US Army, that grease pinches the bullet and raises pressure. Grease may be incompressible, but it is not immovable, and it flows under pressure. Given the taper of the cartridge and the difference in thickness of the case, grease moves up the throat, and out the back of the action, showing that this Army claim is false and unsupportable in the real world. Grease also lubricates the bullet and I experienced zero bullet leading in this barrel with greased bullets.



A tray of fired, ungreased 45-70’s on right, greased fired 45-70 on left.

Ungreased on left, greased on right



I did not use blackpowder, I used AA5744, which is a powder the manufacture claims is safe, at these loads, in this blackpowder action. Accuracy with my loads was horrible. The bullets are not matched to the groove depth. The rifle shot way high at 100 yards, and after looking at ballistic tables, it should shoot way high at 100 yards with the original sight settings.

Code:
M1873 Springfield Trapdoor 1884 rebuild
							
27" sight radius 						
							
405 LRN 27.5gr AA5744 R-P cases WLR trimmed 2.085"		
							
14 Aug  2014 T =  78 °F					
							
Ave Vel =	1302			 	 		
Std Dev =	11			 	 		
ES =	26			 	 		
High =	1315			 	 		
Low =	1289			 	 		
N =	5						
							
First round 15.5" high, rest, 19.5 to 23" high at 100 yards		
							
Ballistic calculator: 100 yd zero, 25" drop at 200 yds, 82" drop at 300 yds	
							
							
405 LRN 27.5gr AA5744 R-P cases WLR trimmed 2.085"		
							
Heavily greased with Lubriplate 130A 				
							
14 Aug  2014 T =  78 °F					
							
Ave Vel =	1346			 	 		
Std Dev =	15			 	 		
ES =	38			 	 		
High =	1371			 	 		
Low =	1333			 	 		
N =	5						
							
At lowest rear sight setting, two bullets 22", one @ 24", one @ 26.5", one @ 30.15" 
at 100 yards						
		
Do not ever shoot jacketed bullets in a 19th century barrel. The barrel steel, might not be steel, might be wrought iron, regardless, if it is steel, it is dead soft and jacketed loads will wash out the rifling.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 10:02 PM   #14
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
If it's a model 1873 do not shoot smokeless out of it. Only use black powder and lead bullets. If it's an 1884 it will handle smokeless ok but still needs lead bullets.
Hawg is offline  
Old January 18, 2016, 10:10 PM   #15
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Quote:
If it's a model 1873 do not shoot smokeless out of it. Only use black powder and lead bullets. If it's an 1884 it will handle smokeless ok but still needs lead bullets.
That is an interesting claim. What is the difference in materials between an M1873 and a 1884 rebuild? Why did my action stay in one piece and why would a M1873 come apart?
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 08:07 PM   #16
gtodan
Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2004
Posts: 34
While at the gunsmith, have him slug the barrel. This will establish your bore diameter. Then you can purchase the right size boolets for your bore size. Clean and check the breech block assy and chamber for cracks also.
gtodan is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 09:17 PM   #17
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I also question the 1873/1884 point. I have a fair amount of info on those rifles and I have seen nothing on any material or structural change that would seem relevant. The breechblock was changed earlier (c. 1877) but not, apparently, due to any weakness.

Frankford Arsenal began loading smokeless powder in the .45 rifle cartridge in early 1898 (30.5 grains of DuPont No. 4 - maybe it became the .45-30.5 instead of .45-70), but in 1899, it was ordered that no issue carbine cartridges were to be loaded with smokeless powder. I don't know the reason.

Certainly commercial .45-70 ammo was loaded with smokeless powder from the early years of the 20th century, and millions of such rounds have been fired in those rifles and carbines. I have not heard of any significant numbers of failures, or any attributed specifically to the use of proper loads of smokeless powder.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old January 20, 2016, 09:53 PM   #18
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,546
I have read somewhere or another - maybe the Wolf book - that the armory smokeless load was very stout.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old January 20, 2016, 11:33 PM   #19
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
I shot a lot of Winchester smokeless rounds out of my 84 carbine made in 89. Guess I was wrong. Sorry for any misinformation.
Hawg is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 12:59 AM   #20
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
That load gave a 500 grain bullet a m.v. of 1428 fps at 18,000 psi pressure. That was about 75 fps greater m.v. with 1000 psi LESS pressure than the black powder load. So it might have been seen (or rather felt) as a "stout"" load.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 04:53 AM   #21
Old Stony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
I've been shooting a smokeless load for years out of my carbine...shoots good and lots of fun. I use a 405 gr. lead with 34 gr. of Imr3031. While mild, it shoots good out of a couple of Sharps I have too with mild recoil and a guy can shoot them all day.
Old Stony is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 11:14 AM   #22
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,546
Quote:
That load gave a 500 grain bullet a m.v. of 1428 fps at 18,000 psi pressure. That was about 75 fps greater m.v. with 1000 psi LESS pressure than the black powder load.
Need to find a carload of that powder stored in Alaska for the past 100 years.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old January 21, 2016, 03:56 PM   #23
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
I firmly believe in black powder only out of those old guns, Colt didn't guarantee the SAA for smokeless until 1896. And that big cloud of white smoke brings back memories-San Juan Hill, 1898
SIGSHR is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 04:30 PM   #24
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
Quote:
And that big cloud of white smoke brings back memories-San Juan Hill, 1898
Remember that do ya?
Hawg is offline  
Old January 21, 2016, 04:47 PM   #25
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,546
I think the main memory would be the 7mms cracking past and wondering why I was stuck with an antique.
Jim Watson is online now  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07514 seconds with 10 queries