Who dose it better, CZ75 or Baby Eagle ???

gac009 · February 1, 2006, 02:25 AM

I know the Baby Eagle is modeled after the CZ 75 so the question is: Is the Baby Eagle superior to the CZ 75? Worse? Something in-between? What are your thoughts.

Wildalaska · February 1, 2006, 02:42 AM

Copies rarely being as well made as originals, I prefer the CZ. They actually are machined nicer and have better fit and finish.

WildneverbeenmuchforimistuffAlaska

O/U Mike · February 1, 2006, 02:20 PM

I have a semi-compact BEagle in brushed chrome and a CZ RAMI that I just bought on Monday and cleaned last night. After looking at the internals of both guns, I'd have to give the BEagle the edge, though I haven't had a chance to fire the RAMI yet. The BEagle has over 600 rounds through it, and I have not experienced even one "FT_".

gac009 · February 1, 2006, 03:51 PM

O/U - how dose the semi-compact and compact Baby Eagle compare to the RAMI in terms of size, is the compact BE really that much bigger? Ive never seem both next to each other.

O/U Mike · February 1, 2006, 04:36 PM

From their respective websites:

The compact Baby Eagle only comes in a polymer frame.

* Black, polymer frame, slide safety, decocker
* Double action/Single action
* Barrel length 3.64" (compact)
* Grip, short 3 1/4"
* Weight w/empty magazine 1 lb. 11.8 oz. (9mm)
* Weight w/empty magazine 1 lb. 10.8 oz. (.40S&W)
* Length 7 1/4"
* Height 5"
* Width 1 1/8"
* Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG910C)
* Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG4010C)

The semi-compact come in steel or polymer and has a full size grip.

* Black, steel frame, slide safety, decocker
* Double action/Single action
* Barrel length 3.93" (semi-compact)
* Grip, full-size 3 3/4" *
* Weight w/empty magazine 2 lbs. 5.7 oz. (9mm) **
* Weight w/empty magazine 2 lbs. 4.4 oz. (.40S&W) **
* Overall length 7 3/4"
* Height 5 3/4"
* Width 1 1/8"
* Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG910)
* Magazine capacity 15-rounds (MAG915)
* Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG4010)

The RAMI is smaller and lighter, but wider, than either of these. It is a sub-compact in size.

CZ 2075 RAMI features:
• CZ 75 Quality and Reliability
• 6.5” long x 4.7” high x 1.25” wide
• 3” barrel
• Weighs less than 25 ounces
• SA/DA action
• Manual safety
• Low profile, snag-free sights
• 10+1 in 9mm, 8+1 in .40 S&W

WESHOOT2 · February 4, 2006, 10:47 AM

I have three Witnesses; I am willing to work on guns I like.

You can't lose

Marlboro Man · February 4, 2006, 11:22 AM

Here is a good comparison for the size of the RAMI

BobK · February 4, 2006, 03:11 PM

Cz is better quality.

IZHUMINTER · February 4, 2006, 03:37 PM

I've owned both in .40, and I prefer the CZ...but not by much. They are both excellent pistols, and feel fantastic in my hands. For some reason I shoot better with the CZ; it may be the grips, as they are the only substantial difference between the two.

One thing I have learned is that Magnum Research "Baby Eagle"/IMI "Jericho" pistols are made to slightly different specs than CZ/EAA/Tangfolio pistols, so that parts are no longer interchangeable. As I've never seen a broken part in either my Baby Eagle or my CZ, this is probably a non-issue.

alexander hamilton · February 4, 2006, 08:43 PM

+1 for cz

gac009 · February 4, 2006, 10:10 PM

+ 1 for CZ

February 1, 2006, 02:25 AM	#1
gac009 Senior Member Join Date: January 19, 2006 Posts: 430	Who dose it better, CZ75 or Baby Eagle ??? I know the Baby Eagle is modeled after the CZ 75 so the question is: Is the Baby Eagle superior to the CZ 75? Worse? Something in-between? What are your thoughts.

February 1, 2006, 02:20 PM	#3
O/U Mike Senior Member Join Date: October 21, 2005 Location: Suburb NW of Chicago Posts: 139	Fit & Finish I have a semi-compact BEagle in brushed chrome and a CZ RAMI that I just bought on Monday and cleaned last night. After looking at the internals of both guns, I'd have to give the BEagle the edge, though I haven't had a chance to fire the RAMI yet. The BEagle has over 600 rounds through it, and I have not experienced even one "FT_".

February 1, 2006, 04:36 PM	#5
O/U Mike Senior Member Join Date: October 21, 2005 Location: Suburb NW of Chicago Posts: 139	Specs From their respective websites: The compact Baby Eagle only comes in a polymer frame. * Black, polymer frame, slide safety, decocker * Double action/Single action * Barrel length 3.64" (compact) * Grip, short 3 1/4" * Weight w/empty magazine 1 lb. 11.8 oz. (9mm) * Weight w/empty magazine 1 lb. 10.8 oz. (.40S&W) * Length 7 1/4" * Height 5" * Width 1 1/8" * Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG910C) * Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG4010C) The semi-compact come in steel or polymer and has a full size grip. * Black, steel frame, slide safety, decocker * Double action/Single action * Barrel length 3.93" (semi-compact) * Grip, full-size 3 3/4" * * Weight w/empty magazine 2 lbs. 5.7 oz. (9mm) ** * Weight w/empty magazine 2 lbs. 4.4 oz. (.40S&W) ** * Overall length 7 3/4" * Height 5 3/4" * Width 1 1/8" * Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG910) * Magazine capacity 15-rounds (MAG915) * Magazine capacity 10-rounds (MAG4010) The RAMI is smaller and lighter, but wider, than either of these. It is a sub-compact in size. CZ 2075 RAMI features: • CZ 75 Quality and Reliability • 6.5” long x 4.7” high x 1.25” wide • 3” barrel • Weighs less than 25 ounces • SA/DA action • Manual safety • Low profile, snag-free sights • 10+1 in 9mm, 8+1 in .40 S&W

February 4, 2006, 10:47 AM	#6
WESHOOT2 Senior Member Join Date: February 20, 1999 Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country) Posts: 14,324	Tanfoglio I have three Witnesses; I am willing to work on guns I like. You can't lose

February 1, 2006, 02:42 AM	#2
Wildalaska Junior member Join Date: November 25, 2002 Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska Posts: 14,171	Copies rarely being as well made as originals, I prefer the CZ. They actually are machined nicer and have better fit and finish. WildneverbeenmuchforimistuffAlaska

February 1, 2006, 03:51 PM	#4
gac009 Senior Member Join Date: January 19, 2006 Posts: 430	O/U - how dose the semi-compact and compact Baby Eagle compare to the RAMI in terms of size, is the compact BE really that much bigger? Ive never seem both next to each other.

February 4, 2006, 11:22 AM	#7
Marlboro Man Junior member Join Date: January 29, 2006 Location: Good ole USA Posts: 206	Here is a good comparison for the size of the RAMI

February 4, 2006, 03:11 PM	#8
BobK Senior Member Join Date: June 19, 2005 Posts: 838	Cz is better quality.

February 4, 2006, 03:37 PM	#9
IZHUMINTER Senior Member Join Date: May 6, 2005 Location: Darmstadt Posts: 240	I've owned both in .40, and I prefer the CZ...but not by much. They are both excellent pistols, and feel fantastic in my hands. For some reason I shoot better with the CZ; it may be the grips, as they are the only substantial difference between the two. One thing I have learned is that Magnum Research "Baby Eagle"/IMI "Jericho" pistols are made to slightly different specs than CZ/EAA/Tangfolio pistols, so that parts are no longer interchangeable. As I've never seen a broken part in either my Baby Eagle or my CZ, this is probably a non-issue.

February 4, 2006, 08:43 PM	#10
alexander hamilton Member Join Date: January 25, 2006 Posts: 73	+1 for cz

February 4, 2006, 10:10 PM	#11
gac009 Senior Member Join Date: January 19, 2006 Posts: 430	+ 1 for CZ