|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 23, 2013, 06:53 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
|
Rumor on executive orders and imports
Is it true that Obama is now trying to "ban" the importation of surplus ammunition and the import of parts kits that may be used to build semi-automatic military style rifles?
Possibly even "ban" (through ATF interpretation) the import of commercial ammo that may be used as military ammunition? http://investmentwatchblog.com/execu...onal-approval/ |
April 23, 2013, 07:09 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,825
|
I had not heard that, but I do know that you can keep abreast of Executive Orders here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-r...ecutive-orders
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
April 23, 2013, 07:14 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
There are always rumors of this, that or the other. Some of them are even true. For whatever reason, BATFE (and thus the White House) have fairly broad discretion over which firearms and ammunition are permitted to be imported into the U.S. It's unlikely that any such action, whether statutorily provided or assumed via executive order, would be ruled unconstitutional (at least in my opinion).
|
April 23, 2013, 07:24 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Interestingly, Pres. Obama has issued fewer executive orders than any other president in the last 100 years. This article from New York Magazine has a graph that compares the executive orders issued per day for all presidents who served during that time span, and Mr. Obama is right at the bottom. By that measure, he has issued fewer executive orders than the likes of George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Calvin Coolidge. The most recent president to issue fewer than Mr. Obama: Grover Cleveland, who left office in 1897.
As to the rumor in the OP, I would give it no credence at all until I see something from more believable sources than that one; or, even better, on the White House page Spats linked or in the Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/exec...ack-obama/2013 |
April 23, 2013, 07:55 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Location: CNY
Posts: 790
|
All this noise comes from Alex Jones doing a newsflash of an article done by The Examiner that basically revolves around the UN Arms Treaty, that still has to be approved by Congress.
Nothing new here, but might as well take the opportunity to write/call your reps and let them know we are against the Arms Treaty. I cant say that enough as I swear 90% of the people that say they do, actually never contact anyone in Congress or The Senate. |
April 23, 2013, 09:24 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
|
I could not find anywhere on that Whitehouse website about the executive orders that Obama signed after Sandy Hook. Why would those executive orders not be listed on the whitehouses own website?
Although Alex Jones can often times get his facts backwards, I wouldn't discount him totally. I would say for sure his chances of getting the news right is about as reliable as CNN or MSNBC. What the issue seems to revolve around is that Obama is attempting to (within his executive powers to abide by the UN treaty that was signed) tell the ATF to go all out and stop whatever imports they can get away with. That is what the article seems to suggest. I am not even sure an executive order would be needed for them to do this. |
April 23, 2013, 09:26 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,825
|
Those orders that were (allegedly) signed right after Sandy Hook have never shown up there, and I do not know why. I've been watching for them.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
April 23, 2013, 09:31 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
While the U.S. voted "yes" on the arms treaty at the U.N., Pres. Obama has NO "powers" under that treaty, nor will he have unless and until the Senate ratifies it, which is approximately as likely as the Easter Bunny running for president next time around. (Which is too bad -- I'd probably vote for her if she did run...)
|
April 23, 2013, 10:25 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
|
He can attempt to use the ATF to try to mirror the requirments of the treaty as much as possible within their power.
He has the authority to do that and has had that authority since being president. The ATF has a lot of leeway in regulating imports of arms. I am sure with a little research you can find a lot of information on it. Curio and Relic dealers know all too well the Kangaroo court the ATF runs. |
April 23, 2013, 10:30 PM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,061
|
Re: Rumor on executive orders and imports
Quote:
Wait, the Easter Bunny's a woman? I am so getting sued now |
|
April 23, 2013, 10:34 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2000
Posts: 1,185
|
Correct me if I'm wrong; but I still remember the day they banned the import of receivers and barrels (pretty sure it was in 2000) - I remember as I was starting to research FALs and in the middle the receivers and barrels were cut off. A cutoff to the rest of the parts on these guns is not outside the realm of the realistic.
(I realize too that domestic manufacture of a lot of this stuff, or of good alternative platforms, makes a lot of this moot compared with a domestic AWB). |
April 23, 2013, 10:38 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
|
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/guides/i...-military.html
They have the authority on surplus ammunition. I know I have seen surplus ammo show up from time to time at ammunition sites I was never aware how much it can be regulated. All they have to basically do is flat out say any ball surplus ammo is non-sporting period. |
April 23, 2013, 11:44 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24, 2013, 12:21 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Location: South West OHIO (boondocks)
Posts: 1,337
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24, 2013, 06:53 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2008
Location: Upper Michigan, above the Mackinac Bridge
Posts: 568
|
When I interpret the graph posted by the NY magazine linked to early in the discussion, one thing that jumps out at me as that Bush II and Obama are virtually the same in the number of EO's issued per day. Per day is a spin by the media to show that Obama hasn't really done any more than Bush II. However, the part that they aren't addressing is that he has only been in office for a little over 4 years so his comparison time is significantly shorter than Bush II. Also, Bush II was in during some of the most controversial times in our history in regards to conducting a new type of war-terrorism. Also not noted is what were the constraints of those EO's issued? Yes Bush II enacted the Patriot Act, but Obama has gone so much farther down the road of eroding private rights and in a much shorter time period, that in my opinion the two are really not comparable. Such as authorizing the use of drone strikes agaist US citizens without established due process. The POTUS making a unilateral decision that you are a terrorist and authorizing the strike is not established due process to me.
As for guns, he can write anything he wants as the court system hasn't addressed any of his other EO's, some of which appear to be borderline on their constitutionality as addressed by pundits far smarter than me. Look at the $3mil cap on retirement funds. How is that anywhere near legal for him to do. I apologize for getting off topic, but please don't close your eyes as he can try anything he wants in regards to guns, ammo, parts, etc. . . It wouldn't surprise me. |
April 24, 2013, 07:20 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,113
|
Obama's executive orders are a red herring issue perpetuated by the fringe media.
To date Obama has signed about 152 executive orders. President G. W. Bush signed 290 executive orders during the 8 years of his presidency. http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...sposition.html Obama's latest executive orders: http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...013.html#13641 Quote:
|
|
April 24, 2013, 08:40 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,171
|
As civily and politely as possible, I'll simply state that Alex Jones gives me way too much of a headache whenever I have had the displeasure of listening to him. I'll just leave it at that.
On topic, I don't think we should be getting all hyped up right now until something official has been documented. Stay vigilant, though, Obama did make it clear that he plans on continuing the push for more gun control, at the very least in the form on an EO. |
April 24, 2013, 09:00 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24, 2013, 12:22 PM | #19 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,061
|
Quote:
That said, the orders were apparently signed, but they haven't been published on the White House site.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
April 24, 2013, 12:37 PM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,113
|
Quote:
Obama's 23 "executive actions": Quote:
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-contro...e-actions-guns |
||
April 24, 2013, 12:56 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Just so.
The reason that no executive orders regarding gun control have appeared on the White House site or in the Federal Register is that the President hasn't issued any. According to this article in New York Magazine, he has issued the 23 orders as "executive actions" or "presidential memoranda;" it seems that the administration considers these to be less likely to be seen as "going around Congress," presumably in part because executive actions don't have to be published in the Federal Register. (Three of the 23 were issued in the form of presidential memoranda; these are published in the Federal Register under the heading "Presidential Documents.") Striking another blow for transparency in government... Last edited by Evan Thomas; April 24, 2013 at 04:54 PM. |
April 24, 2013, 12:59 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
And how does this interact with, as Chief Executive, promulgating more/different regulations and standards through the BATFE, as an executive department, with powers delegated by Congress? (Honestly asking where, if at all those would show up from the President's Desk)
|
April 24, 2013, 01:10 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,113
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24, 2013, 04:45 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
I've deleted some posts. Just a reminder: L&CR rules prohibit posting links to " ineffectual and useless online petitions."
|
April 24, 2013, 05:00 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
But not a specific, and reasonably plausible one on the White House website that will in fact get a response with enough signatures?
|
|
|