The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 1, 2012, 07:55 PM   #51
Jeff #111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2001
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,072
Sounds reasonable to me. Just passing on what I found in a book from the 1950's. I agree with you though in that the clothing might have stopped the 45, but the .30 Carbine is a high velocity round. S.L.A. Marshall also passed on that information about the 30 Carbine not being up to snuff, but as we all know Marshall's research is viewed by many nowdays with a skeptical eye.
Jeff #111 is offline  
Old October 1, 2012, 10:12 PM   #52
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
Marshalls reports on small arms in Korea was sparkly compiled from interviews of many combat veterans.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old October 2, 2012, 05:16 AM   #53
seeker_two
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
"Sparkly"?......
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0......
seeker_two is offline  
Old October 2, 2012, 05:29 AM   #54
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
Sorry, late night typing on my phone....

It should have read largely...
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old October 2, 2012, 09:36 AM   #55
Jeff #111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2001
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,072
Mike Irwin
Quote:
Marshalls reports on small arms in Korea was sparkly compiled from interviews of many combat veterans.
Not a problem.

Starting in the seventies information began to come out about Marshall and his methodology. Some of it were from veterans that he interviewed. They stated that he led people to believe that he interviewed the vets days and sometimes even hours after the action when it turned out in many cases they interviews took place months later. Some of the men interviewed stated that Marshall had them providing details that they couldn't recall at the time of the interview.

In other words it began to appear the Marshall made stuff up.

The biggest problem arose with Marshall's assertion that his research revealed that only a very small number of troops actually fired their weapons in combat. At the time this was like a lightning bolt striking a tree. Caused the Army to revamp it's entire training program - which cost millions of dollars.

Then years later it comes out that there were some serious problems with Marshall's figures.

Now while some of it was probably the work of people who didn't like Marshall there were some problems. I suppose it could be argued that Marshall saw a problem and took it upon himself to fix it - so he inflated numbers and ommited other things. But it doesn't change the fact that there were problems and all of his research has to be looked at carefully now.

That's what I was referring to.
Jeff #111 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05988 seconds with 10 queries