|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 1, 2017, 02:34 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Glock Officially Lodges Protest of the Army Choosing Sigs
Glock has launched an official protest of the U.S. Army's choice of the Sig with the GAO.
http://www.gao.gov/docket/B-414401.1 The protest will halt the forward momentum of the sale of the Sigs to teh Army until whatever issues Glock raises are resolved. Right now we don't know the details of that what Glock complains of. Formal challenges of DOD purchases are common. Quote:
https://www.armytimes.com/articles/g...or-new-handgun tipoc |
|
March 1, 2017, 02:43 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,427
|
From what I understand of the competition, and have read about, the rules of this competition weren't what we typically see.
Competitors could submit handguns that didn't meet all criteria, and they would still be considered. And, based on reports from the last year (two?), it sounds like Glock submitted bone-stock ("standard") G17s and G19s for testing. The "compact" and "full-size" differentiation, combined with the ability to install longer, threaded barrels, was enough for consideration in the competition. How they ever made it as a finalist, is beyond me. It continues to appear, at least from the sources I've read, that Glock submitted nothing more than G17s, G19s, and some extra barrels.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 1, 2017, 07:13 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,084
|
I like Glocks but sounds like a bit of sour grapes.
|
March 1, 2017, 07:58 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Not surprising with a contract of this size. I am curious as to what their claims are however.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
March 1, 2017, 08:24 AM | #5 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
I'd be more surprised that nobody contested a small arms related contract. Even the accessory contracts get protested routinely.
|
March 1, 2017, 08:33 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Posts: 975
|
I'm sure a lot of government contracts are decided before the start of the bidding process. It is incredibly easy to tailor specifications to favor one company and I'm sure there are a number of ways for the government to get out of giving a contract to someone they don't want to. Generally it seems, contesting the decision for a government contract won't get you the contract and is primarily meant to embarrass those who make the decisions for the contract.
|
March 1, 2017, 12:47 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...lot of government contracts are decided before the start..." Yep and there ain't nothing more political than military procurement contracts.
Nothing new about it either. Apparently, there was political to the point of criminal shenanigans that went on when the Trap Door Springfield was selected.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
March 1, 2017, 02:14 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
This is an article on the early trials that led to the selection of the M9. It's from the American Handgunner of May/June 1983
The article begins on page 56 and is a useful read today in light of what's going on now. http://americanhandgunner.com/1983issues/HMJ83.pdf Also you can see how gun magazines were better back then. Even the ads are informative. tipoc |
March 1, 2017, 04:59 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
I think I'll Boycott Glock over this.
|
March 1, 2017, 05:04 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Good Grief Charles Brown! Another reason not to be fond of Glock!
|
March 1, 2017, 05:37 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2014
Location: Bout as south as it gets
Posts: 1,238
|
Like my Glock & always will. I appreciate beauty and art work, but no matter how you dress it up a Pistol is a Pistol. Some are just better made than others.
I'll take better made every time.
__________________
Shoot well and be Accurate, Doc |
March 1, 2017, 07:24 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2014
Location: northern Mn.
Posts: 271
|
I can just see all those little Glocks carrying signs, protesting at the pentagon, Black Guns Matter.
|
March 1, 2017, 07:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2014
Location: Bout as south as it gets
Posts: 1,238
|
My gun is black?????
__________________
Shoot well and be Accurate, Doc |
March 1, 2017, 08:16 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,427
|
Quote:
As mentioned by others, I'd be surprised to NOT see a protest filed after any military weapon/aircraft competition.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
March 1, 2017, 09:49 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: October 25, 2016
Posts: 77
|
No external safety, have to pull the trigger when feild stripping, not really modular three strikes agains glock from the get go. They knew the requirements before their submission. Or did the Russians hack the results..........
|
March 4, 2017, 11:55 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,317
|
I wonder what Glock hopes to get out of this? Do they think the trials will be redone and that they will have a chance to get the contract or is something else afoot here?
P.S. Thanks Tipoc for the American Handgunner article. Last edited by DaleA; March 4, 2017 at 12:19 PM. Reason: added the thanks for the American Handgunner reference |
March 4, 2017, 05:31 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,427
|
It's a standard Hail Mary move.
If you win the appeal, you have another shot at the competition. If you lose, it still sets back the time table for your opponent earning their profit. Three typical outcomes, and a fourth (rarer) outcome: 1. The DoD tells Glock that they lost and need to go away. 2. The DoD re-opens the competition in order to fully evaluate/re-evaluate something that Glock thinks was missed. 3. The DoD scraps the results, entirely, and starts the competition over. 4. The DoD scraps the results, and can't figure out how to rewrite the rules to get their winner again. *** *** A la CSAR-X helicopter competition that ran from ~2002-2007, where the Air Force selected a helicopter (CH-47G) that was too big, too heavy, and didn't meet the requirements of the competition, while all other entries did. Protests were filed. Even lawsuits were filed. The entire process and result scrapped, legitimately and justifiably. Congress and Pentagon angry at wasted funds. Air Force can't figure out how to sneak the 47G in for CSAR-X (in order to quietly shift it over to Special Operations, because the then-new CV-22 Osprey couldn't take over the duties of the mid-retirement MH-53Ms), so they give up and wait for the next generation of helicopters. (Bell and Boeing have some awesome stuff in the works, and Sikorsky's self-funded S-97 project looks like a winner, before the next competition has even started.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 5, 2017, 07:57 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,097
|
How easy it is to forget.........
For those decrying Glocks protest........you don't remember Sig doing the exact same thing when the military chose the Beretta 92?
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
March 5, 2017, 08:00 PM | #19 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 25,005
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
March 6, 2017, 08:31 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2007
Posts: 761
|
Filing a protest costs nothing more than the time it takes to do it, I've known companies in some industries do it not in an effort to reverse the outcome but simply to harm their competitors - a protest puts a halt on performance (and therefore cash flow) of the awardee.
Quote:
|
|
March 6, 2017, 08:47 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2013
Posts: 493
|
Glad I sold my glock will never own another
|
March 6, 2017, 08:54 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2009
Location: Key West
Posts: 162
|
Glock is just having a tantrum. I feel Sig is a far better gun and also, although a German based company, made in America.
__________________
To say that guns kill people is to say that automobiles drive drunk and matches commit arson.... |
March 6, 2017, 11:17 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2014
Location: Floyd, VA
Posts: 242
|
I don’t know how weapon solicitations work, but I bid on multi-million dollar US Government contracts for synthetic jet engine oils for 20 years and found the people and procedures to be absolutely fair and unbiased, that is they faithfully followed the rules. As for the rules being fair and unbiased, that is a different story.
The only protest I ever saw was one that I filed when a large oil company conspired with a small business to win the small business set-aside portion of a contract. The small business then conspired with a "disadvantaged" business to get a 10% bid advantage. Since the definition of a disadvantaged business hinged on the country where the owner was born, I filed based on the fact that the product was actually manufactured by a large business, and the disadvantaged business criteria was discriminatory. The DLA investigated and ruled against me on the grounds that the rules were followed, even though the rules were flawed, so I appealed to the GAO. They agreed with the DLA, so I filed suit in Federal court. The judge bit on the discrimination aspect and, being an election year, the DOJ immediately wanted to settle. Net result is I was awarded the contract, the competitor was disqualified, and the rules for disadvantaged businesses were changed. So such challenges can be won if they are legitimate. If Glock has material grounds based on procedures or bias they may have a bona-fide case, although they may have to bump it outside of the military system. If it is just sour grapes it will be disposed of in fairly short order.
__________________
In NJ, the bad guys are armed and the households are alarmed. In VA, the households are armed and the bad guys are alarmed. Last edited by TomNJVA; March 7, 2017 at 12:04 PM. |
March 6, 2017, 10:03 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2007
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
So we may be waiting around for a while. |
|
March 6, 2017, 11:09 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Posts: 1,177
|
Over two decades ago Gaston Glock engineered an elegantly simple, no frills, and extremely reliable service pistol. That pistol design has served individuals and law enforcement well for many years.
I am not about to let corporate lawyers making business decisions that have nothing to do with the design, function or performance of the platform influence my oppinion of that pistol. Everyone is free to vote with their wallet, but this is just business/politics and nothing new.
__________________
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. Claire Wolfe |
|
|