September 21, 2009, 03:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 450
|
Should i go VX??
Ok so im looking around at some Leupold VX-lll in 3.5-10x40mm
But the more i look around the cheaper they look and im not too sure about the performance.. for a while iv had my mind set on them but the longer i look around the more and more i get cold feet and rethink abut putting it on my rifle.. (Remington 700 .308) I am looking to target shoot but hunt from time to time and get a variable power and put 1/4 turret adjustment on if it doesnt come with any and a mil-dot reticles and keep it in the $500-600 range.. Because really out side of nikon and leupold i dont know much about scopes and other companies out side of the 2. So really is there another scope around that range i could look at or is the VX III series just fine and im thinking about it too much?
__________________
Bullet placement over bullet wastement |
September 24, 2009, 03:01 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 450
|
55 views and still nothin haha
So i take it just go with the VX then?
__________________
Bullet placement over bullet wastement |
September 24, 2009, 03:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 1,007
|
I'm no expert but people I talk to really like their Leupolds. I've looked through some that were really clear and bright. Personally for one reason or another I've always wound up with Nikons and I like them. I'd say it's a coin toss. I do like that the Leupold is US made. As an alternative some people swear by the Bushnell Elite series. Like I said I'm no expert, I just saw you weren't getting much help.
Go to Midway USA and you can read the reviews of different products. I sometimes find that helpful when I'm having trouble making up my mind. Last edited by shepherddogs; September 24, 2009 at 03:54 PM. |
September 25, 2009, 04:01 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 450
|
Haha thank you.. every little bit helps..
Im just looking to get that little nudge into either direction before i make my decision concrete.
__________________
Bullet placement over bullet wastement |
September 25, 2009, 06:46 AM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2
|
I've bought two scopes in the last couple months so I've looked at a lot of them. I boiled it down to Leupold, Nikon or Sightron. Couldn't find a Sightron in a store that I could handle and every time I compare the Nikon to the Leupold, I end up buying the Nikon.
They're both great products, the Nikons are just much clearer and brighter for my eyes. The only downside to the Nikon is that BDC reticle. They need a better ranging reticle than that. |
September 25, 2009, 07:44 AM | #6 |
Staff Emeritus
Join Date: March 9, 2000
Location: Virden, IL
Posts: 5,917
|
Sorry I'm not a lot of help here, but I just don't use scopes. All the games I play are based on iron sights, and in the woods I hunt, if I can tell the game is there, I can hit it. We have the Rifleman's 50 Yards in there.
I could give you advice, but I would be forced to advise you not to follow it.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don Gwinn: Chicago Gun Rights Examiner |
September 25, 2009, 10:03 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 933
|
I have a VX II and a VX III. For the price range they are good scopes
|
|
|