|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 30, 2001, 02:09 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 219
|
Connecticuy is Full Auto Only
Possibly full auto only is because a whole lot less weapons are made full auto only. Most are semi or 3 shot burst combined with full auto.
|
January 3, 2002, 02:39 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2001
Location: Western Connecticut
Posts: 212
|
Referencing my post above-
I'm pretty sure that CT's "rationale" for full-auto-only is that under CT law, selective fire guns are assault weapons, and under CT law, assault weapons are BAD. |
January 6, 2002, 12:18 PM | #28 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 3, 2001
Posts: 226
|
Under any law assult weapons are bad. Don't you know that assult weapons kill people? Guns kill people, thats why they should all be banned. Taking the guns from law abiding citizens makes for a safer community. Don't you understand that? ROFLMAO
|
January 10, 2002, 04:54 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2001
Location: Pasadena, California
Posts: 590
|
Hmm...while California is miserable as far as gun rights go, all the states bordering it are far more reasonable -- unlicensed purchase of any firearm, and "shall issue" for concealed carry. No mention of assault weapons, either, so if the Feds say it's OK then it's OK.
|
|
|