|
June 19, 2007, 03:21 AM
|
#1 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,450
|
Full-Auto 1911 (Video)
This is the greatest thing I've ever seen. Is there more than one of these on the list o' registered MGs? If one of these ever goes on sale I'm buying it.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXh3nRd1K8U |
|
|
June 19, 2007, 04:21 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 232
|
That'd be fun 'til you ran out of ammo.
__________________
The two loudest sounds in the world are a click when you expect a bang, and a bang when you expect a click. |
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 10:13 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I have not fired that particular gun, which appears to be a "one off" home build, but I have fired several selective fire pistols, 9mm, .45, and 7.63, with and without shoulder stocks.
But I have a problem. In spite of deep concentration and going into prayer and fasting, I have not been able to think of anything more useless. The stocked .45 pistol alone, without serious ear protection, is a sure path to deafness. An auto version will hit nothing with anything but the first shot except at bellygun range. I'll pass. P.S. A standard magazine lasts less than a second. Jim |
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 11:51 AM
|
#4 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Location: Comanche Co. Texas
Posts: 737
|
F/a 1911
The F/A 1911 shown on the video with it's shoulder stock with the addition of a much longer barrel (available) and much larger capacity magazine would be an awesome ClassIII weapon, but........ If you have the many thousands of dollars to spend, an M3 .45cal. submachine gun is out there someplace, or the better 1928 F/A Thompson.
Whether we civilians under the Federal Firearms Act of 1934, need, desire, want, or whatever, the cost of obtaining them are prohibitive and the cost of not conforming to the law certainly is much more expensive in terms of dollars and prison......... |
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 12:03 PM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Location: Youngtown Arizona
Posts: 1,135
|
IMO a single stack .45 and full auto dont make sence
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 01:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,450
|
Impractical? Yep.
Half crazy? You bet. Insanely expensive? Probably. I still want one.
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 05:15 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Junior member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2007, 07:30 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
You only live once 
__________________
All I ever seem to read on this Internet is a bunch of "I heard..." or "I read..." sort of stuff. "One test = 1,000 expert opinions." -Art Eatman |
|
|
|
|
July 18, 2007, 02:10 AM
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 141
|
FUll auto 1911...
THAT IS A WICKED VID!!! I want one... I just may build one now (im a C2 SOT in FL)!!!! That would be completely useless, but sooooooo muuuuccccchhhhhh friggin FUUUUNNNNNN!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Imagine showing up at the range with that thing!! The attention would be awesome!! You'd be the envy of every gun nutt everywhere... Of course I will probably use a Kimber as a base.... Cant wait to get back state-side and back to my toys!!!
__________________
 Write your representative and say no to HR 1022!!! (Yet another $%$(&^-up law)!http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Fe...d.aspx?id=2668 - HR 1022 Assault Weapons Ban & Law Enforcement Protection Act (2007) http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409898348 - Online Petition against! DO YOUR PART, WRITE YOUR DAMN REP, and DEMAND VETO! 
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
