|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 7, 2015, 05:15 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,829
|
Metal,
My definition of full length resizing is just that - full length of the brass is resized; mouth, neck, shoulder, body, and big part of the head. Not really has much to do with the shell holder. In fact I have to grind off the top of a few shell holders for the brass to go in further. Partial length resizing is anything short of that. Now I generally ignore the recommendations that come with the die instructions. I resize the brass to fit my gun's chamber. When I close the bolt I'd like to have the slightest hint of resistance. Best to have the resistance just disappeared. For autos and other action types, I'd go 0.004" further. -TL Last edited by tangolima; September 7, 2015 at 05:24 PM. |
September 7, 2015, 05:23 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Partial is easy to understand, once you remove the voodoo.
You set up the F/L die intentionally short, usually backed off 1 or 2 full turns. You mark the neck & shoulder with smoke from a candle or something similar. Now you run the press cycle & look at the removed smoke smudge. It will be short. Now you bring the die down 1/2 as much as you think is "perfect" resize again & recheck the smudge. Repeat the size, check, adjust 1/2 until you get the amount of resizing you're looking for. Personally I look for a 360 degree circle right at the body/shoulder junction, YMMV.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
September 9, 2015, 08:09 AM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
|
As I said before, I started loading late in life. When I started working on guns, reloads were suspect as far as reliability (And rightly so). As available components became better quality, I started into reloading. I never neck sized and was a pariah among the reloading crowd because of my belief that it was nonsense. My point always was: If you have an uneven expansion ring around the base of your case after firing, you will be forcing most of the neck sized cases back in the next time you fire them. I don't know about new production guns, but this non-concentric condition on brass was real common years ago. It usually is a misalignment between the chamber and bolt, the face of the bolt is not on a 90* angle with the chamber, or the lip of the bolt runs out and cams the case off at an angle. Sometimes you can stand the empty brass on a table and visually see that it is "Leaning" to one side. If you load that neck sized case in 180* out, I can not see anything good coming of it. What goes around, comes back around. I guess F/L resizing is now a good thing again.
|
September 9, 2015, 07:37 PM | #54 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
May 3, 2016, 01:05 PM | #55 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2013
Posts: 10
|
Full Length VS Neck Resizing.?
I FL Resize all of my Rifle Cases Rem 223, Win 243, Win 270, Win 308, Reason being,? My Son & Grandson, & My Buddy,? Shoot some of the same Calibers mentioned above,?So for different Rifles,Besides just mine,? I find it better just to FL Resize,? So there are not any problems,? In any of mine,Or their Bolt Action Rifles,? It works out Well, So why fix,? What not is broke.?
|
|
|