|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 19, 2018, 02:47 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
6 Reasons Gun Control Will Not Solve Mass Killings-The Daily Signal
An interesting article from "The Daily Signal" about gun control.
Disclaimer: I haven't had any previous experience with "The Daily Signal". The article specifically addresses Australia and the claim they have eliminated mass public shootings by implementing an "assault weapons" ban. Also interesting is a list of mass killings in other countries, some of these countries are routinely held up as reasons for tighter gun control in the U.S.--it shows that other countries, some with tight gun control, can still have problems with mass violence. The article can be found here: https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/03/...mass-killings/ Another place where the article was published is here: http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...s-24975?page=3 |
March 19, 2018, 03:50 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,293
|
Machine guns were highly regulated in the Firearms Control Act of 1934 and death by machine gun went to zero, at least for civilians in the USA.
We do have gun control, it’s a matter of degree. |
March 19, 2018, 04:00 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2015
Location: ga
Posts: 321
|
It’s a complex issue, gun violence or just violence
A homogeneation of a society, presents of organized crime all affect the stats USA is not the UK, or EU or Deutschland, if some likes the laws they have they could move there(; |
March 19, 2018, 07:40 PM | #4 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Um. No. As for the effectiveness of the legislation they passed afterwards, actual compliance is only around 19%. The vast majority of guns turned in were not "military style" weapons, but "low risk" guns like SXS shotguns and single-shot rimfire rifles. As for effects on violent crime in general, the numbers suggest no significant change. * It's also important to note that mass shootings (what we used to call "spree shootings") were very infrequent occurrences with lower body counts prior to Columbine. Since then, we've seen a copycat effect attributable to increased media coverage bordering on hero worship for these guys.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
March 19, 2018, 07:58 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2017
Location: laiceps erehwon
Posts: 165
|
Tom, your last sentence is exactly right. If the media has to report on these incidents, they should NOT PUBLISH ANY INFO ON THE SHOOTER. It is absolutely not necessary information and should be banned somehow. (And please don't bring up the First Amendment. They can report the story and just say "the shooter" or whatever and this is how it should be restricted.)
__________________
If God is watching us, the least we can do is be entertaining. I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! If you need a real belly laugh, try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFCrJleggrI |
March 20, 2018, 07:35 AM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
The thing is, you really can't avoid making some mention of the shooter's name and background. The matter of hero worship and emulation is an issue for which the horse left the barn during the post-Columbine ratings scramble. When Rolling Stone put one of the Boston bombers on the cover, it was just a symptom of a larger cultural problem. This is why we have 21.2 crime shows about serial killers running on television at any given time.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
March 20, 2018, 05:19 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,473
|
The anti-gun forces are again (for the moment) hot after "sssault weapons," because the Parkland shooter used an AR-15. They don't choose to discuss that a week after Parkland, a far worse school massacre was avoided in Utah because the would-be assailant was a lousy bomb maker. Bans on so-called "assault weapons" don't help stop weaponized backpacks.
Today's shooter in Maryland was armed with a handgun. Again, a ban on so-called "assault weapons" wouldn't have made any difference, because the weapon wasn't an "assault weapon." (At least, not by their definition.) The message we need to keep stressing, IMHO, is that guns are not the problem, "gun violence" is not the problem, violence is the problem. |
March 20, 2018, 10:39 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
|
|
March 20, 2018, 11:38 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
|
March 22, 2018, 01:20 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2017
Location: laiceps erehwon
Posts: 165
|
And the likelihood of that happening will be about equal to the sun rising in the west and setting in the east.
__________________
If God is watching us, the least we can do is be entertaining. I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! If you need a real belly laugh, try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFCrJleggrI |
March 22, 2018, 10:40 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
The problem with being in a panic is that reasoned sense comes later. Usually much later.
We are still in the witch-burning stage of our current panic. Hang on to this for later...
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
|
|