|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 27, 2018, 05:07 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 18, 2006
Location: Bowling Green,KY
Posts: 433
|
Ruger Ranch predator vs Ranch 223 opinion?
At 200 yards, would I see much difference in accuracy of the shorter barrel ranch rifle? Thanks!
__________________
Bowling Green, KY |
June 27, 2018, 05:56 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2018
Posts: 302
|
accuracy no, velocity..yes. That is the short answer
|
June 27, 2018, 07:17 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
|
I think it is very likely that the Predator will be more accurate, but not because of the barrel length. But every gun is an individual, there are no guarantees and I wouldn't expect a huge difference either way. At least not at 200 yards. Get out to longer ranges and you reach a point where the extra speed from the longer barrel matters.
Between myself and 2 friends we own five Predators in 308, 6.5 CM, and 223. We also own several standard and Ranch rifles in 223, 5.56, and 308. The Predators as a rule shoot better.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong" Winston Churchill |
June 27, 2018, 10:54 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
I have the Ranch in .300 BLK, and I like the shorter overall length of the rifle. My Ranch rifle has proven to be a 1.5 MOA rifle at 300 yards with several different factory loads 115-220 grains. What kind of accuracy standard are you looking for?
The rifles both have the same potential for accuracy, as they use the same action, trigger, stock, and manufacturing process. The Predator will be slightly heavier because of the longer and slightly thicker barrel profile. Being slightly heavier overall and the heavier barrel profile not heating up as fast probably gives a slight accuracy advantage.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
June 27, 2018, 02:01 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
Like Bfglowkey says(differently. snicker.), barrel length has nothing to do with accuracy.
The only difference between a Ranch Predator and Ranch is the barrel length. Weight difference is 1/2 a pound.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
June 29, 2018, 12:07 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,313
|
clear
Just so we're all on the same page, there's the Ruger American Ranch, and the Ruger American Predator.
As far as I know, there is not an American Ranch Predator. |
June 29, 2018, 12:50 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,889
|
I've been finding that shorter barrels are more accurate, but when you go from 22 inches to 16 inches with .223... you lose a lot of velocity and therefore energy.
If all you're looking at shooting is varmints, nbd, if you're looking for this as an anti-personnel rifle, it's been well noted that 18 inch and longer barrels are most effective for .223. I think the Predator is the better choice, it's a very accurate rifle. A 16 inch bolt action just doesn't make sense to me unless you live in less than free states.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
June 29, 2018, 07:19 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 18, 2006
Location: Bowling Green,KY
Posts: 433
|
Thanks for your advice. I think I will go with the predator!
__________________
Bowling Green, KY |
June 29, 2018, 09:44 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
I don't think I'd worry about it too much, but some things bother other people more than me. Of course I'm willing to give up some velocity for better handling characteristics. Plus it sounds like the OP made his choice.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
June 29, 2018, 10:25 AM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"You'll loose an average 30 fps per inch with 55 grain bullets,"
In the test I ran, the diff was closer to 50 fps/inch between 20" and 16" using an average velocity of the 20" barrels compared to the average from 16" barrels. |
June 29, 2018, 09:27 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2018
Posts: 302
|
What powder used could factor in explaining the difference lost from round to round testing. If Mobuck used Varget and Taylor used Win 748 for example. Shorter barrels USUALLY require faster burning powders. I am sure some obscure rifle/round exists that will make me look the fool
|
June 30, 2018, 09:20 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
|
|