September 6, 2011, 07:41 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2006
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 110
|
FMJ Hard On Barrel?
I've noticed many people use .22 caliber FMJ bullets for plinking, minimal pelt damage, etc. I always thought they were hard on barrels. Is that true?
__________________
Strangers in the night exchanging tracers. |
September 6, 2011, 07:47 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
.22LR bullets aren't really FMJ. They are copper plated and are still really soft.
|
September 6, 2011, 07:58 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
.22 Hornet,.218 Bee, .223, .222, .22-250, .220 Swift...He did not say ".22 Long Rifle".
|
September 6, 2011, 08:23 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2006
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 110
|
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I'm speaking of reloading .22 centerfires with FMJ bullets.
__________________
Strangers in the night exchanging tracers. |
September 6, 2011, 08:26 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,077
|
FMJ's are more often than not better for the barrel than a lead bullet and whatever the owner shoves down the bore to remove the leading.
|
September 6, 2011, 08:29 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
|
Why would it be any different then a FMJ in other calibers? Other then a few M60's and M2's when I was in the military, I've never seen a barrel ware out.
|
September 6, 2011, 08:30 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Full-metal jackets will be no harder on the barrel than jacketed soft-points or jacketed hollow points. However, there are still some surplus factory loads and possibly pulled military bullets that have a steel core, around. There can be a case made for them being hard on the bore. But, commercial bullets for hand loading will have a lead core and it is more a function of high-intensity loads eroding the throat that causes the barrel to be "shot-out"...not the bullet itself.
|
September 6, 2011, 11:37 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 943
|
I'm no authority on barrel wear, but my personal opinion is that far more barrels wear out at the throat from erosion from heat and gas pressure than from too many jacketed bullets being passed through them.
|
September 6, 2011, 11:41 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
|
Aren't the jackets of FMJs and soft points about the same? Why would FMJs cause more wear?
|
September 6, 2011, 11:54 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,955
|
I think the answers to the original question can all be summed up as follows:
no. |
September 7, 2011, 11:23 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,730
|
No. In general, Bullet Jackets are made from special gilding metal copper alloy composed of 95% copper and 5% zinc.
|
September 7, 2011, 07:41 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Posts: 389
|
Something else to think of. Oil absorbed into the barrel after cleaning and oiling will provide some lubrication. Just like the cylinder wall in a piston engine, the oil does not readily burn off.
|
September 8, 2011, 10:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 753
|
When it comes to barrel life heat is your enemy,you loose accuracy when the throat starts to erode and heat accelerated that erosion. Shooting any high velocity small caliber varmint style cartridge in rapid succession over many rds. without letting the barrel cool does more damage that the type bullet you use.
As far as J bullets being better for your bore than lead bullet,you will find it hard to ever wear out a good barrel shooting cast lead bullet through it,if you find that you getting leading in your rifles bore than you either have a rough bore or you have a bullet/lube problem. My cleaning procedure after shooting cast lead in my rifles come down to pushing a wet patch down the bore followed by a couple dry patches,wiping the lube ring of the muzzle and running a patch lightly coated with Ed's Red down the bore and I go home. |
September 9, 2011, 12:34 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Posts: 2,017
|
Quote:
To the op>> As stated, bullets don't cause wear--hot gas does. Copper is a lot softer than the steel in a barrel could ever be. Wear comes from either a: hot-loading excessively, b: foreign matter infiltrating (dust, dirt, moisture, excessive oil, etc), c: improper cleaning, d: continuous overheating, or e: a very long life. FMJ's aren't a factor in barrel wear by any real measurable means.
__________________
"Why is is called Common Sense when it seems so few actually possess it?" Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. |
|
September 9, 2011, 10:23 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
|
|
September 9, 2011, 04:46 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Posts: 389
|
" Cast iron and steel are not the same. "
Makes no difference. Lube is used to fill in rough rubbing surfaces so the peaks don't rub against each other and shear off material. This is the basis of lubrication. Some cylinders ( like liners in a industrial diesel ) are very hard to reduce wear and are more steel like than iron. Also roller and ball bearings are steel and they get lube. |
September 10, 2011, 08:46 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,077
|
Quote:
As for backing up the nonsense that owners do more damage to barrels than FMJ, look to all of the bore guides, jigs to drill recievers so you can rod from the chamber end and coated rods to prevent damage as evidence. |
|
September 10, 2011, 10:06 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
Well, it actually does. CI is easier to lubricate effectively than steel. The larger grain structure in CI provides a lot of places oil can sit and not be actually at the friction points. This allows it to migrate after the a moving pass back out on the surface. |
|
September 11, 2011, 03:27 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
|
Goodness.
M14, you were clear enough, most of us knew you weren't reloading a .22 RF. Civilian FMJ bullets have the same jacket as other nose types so being full jackted has no unsual effect. Even military copper clad steel FMJ jackets produce little - if any - serious barrel wear; most of their wear is due to the heat of rapid firing. The solid steel cores in armor piercing military bullets are covered by enough copper to totally prevent any potential bore damage. No one has yet "worn out" a barrel with lead bullets. A reloader who knows what he's doing will not have a heavily leaded bore to be damaged by improper cleaning. If two or three passes with a brass bore brush and solvent doesn't remove all traces of lead, the load, bullet or bullet lube needs to be changed. No one has a cast iron barrel so that's irrelivant to the issue. Oil burns quickly in a barrel, one shot and it's gone either by pushing out or burning and leaving a carbon deposit on the bore. Deliberately shooting through an oily bore and the hard carbon deposit it leaves is NOT condusive to accuracy. |
|
|