The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 21, 2023, 10:42 PM   #1
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Frankford Arsenal Universal Bullet Seater Die Uasers?

Anyone use the Frankford Arsenal Universal Seating Die system? I have an RCBS Rock Chucker. Looks like it would be helpful in more accurately adjusting seating depth.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 08:31 AM   #2
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,977
I have one. I use it regularly. There are a few small quirks, but over all it is great and I would highly recommend it.

My main issue is with some bullets, specifically, ones that are not particularly pointy, using the feed window, do not feed well. However you can still set the bullet on the case and feed from the bottom without issue. Or with my progressive I start the bullets in my regular seater in 1 stage, and finish seating with the frankford as the final seating step.

My main concern was that is was my first time using a micrometer die and I was not sure if it would be accurate or not. After a fair bit of measuring, and double checking my work, I found the hash marks to be dead on with my calipers measurements.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.

Last edited by Shadow9mm; February 22, 2023 at 08:36 AM.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 12:07 PM   #3
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow9mm View Post
I have one. I use it regularly. There are a few small quirks, but over all it is great and I would highly recommend it.

My main issue is with some bullets, specifically, ones that are not particularly pointy, using the feed window, do not feed well. However you can still set the bullet on the case and feed from the bottom without issue. Or with my progressive I start the bullets in my regular seater in 1 stage, and finish seating with the frankford as the final seating step.

My main concern was that is was my first time using a micrometer die and I was not sure if it would be accurate or not. After a fair bit of measuring, and double checking my work, I found the hash marks to be dead on with my calipers measurements.
Thanks, Jon.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 04:52 PM   #4
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
I suggest reading this article about some seating die tests.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 05:18 PM   #5
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unclenick View Post
I suggest reading this article about some seating die tests.
I know run-out does have an effect on loads, but I also always understood that the effect is minimal in the grand scheme of things. I don't have any tools to measure run-out. I have a hard time justifying buying the expensive tools so I can buy more expensive dies in the hopes that they provide reduced run out to gain a fraction of a moa of difference. I have been able to get sub moa groups and have never measured. But I am always trying to learn as well.

Johnnies reloading bench did a test on dies in relation to concentricity. Surprisingly the lee performed best if I remember correctly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIK5wq5vuSU

F-class John just did a video on run out. Found some interesting stuff doing some crazy run out between 0.003 to 0.045https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m8Y6ZmSBiU

I did read the article. interesting stuff. However based on Hornady's podcast here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yZyXwy40JM to be statistically significant you need to shoot about 20rnds. in this case only 10rnds were fired. And I personally feel testing with a bagged gun with an optic would have removed some variables compared to prone with iron sights.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.

Last edited by Shadow9mm; February 22, 2023 at 05:31 PM.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 07:26 PM   #6
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Well, actually, I was aiming that at USAF Ret, since he raised the question about a seating die, and I wanted to provide some food for thought.

There is no blanket truth about the effect. If you have followed any of the stuff from Hornady or others on jacket symmetry and out-of-balance bullets, the effect of bullet tilt is exactly the same. It depends on the bullet design and how far forward of the geometric center of the bearing surface the particular design's center of gravity is. Opening of groups by up to 1.25 moa has been documented with long, short bearing surface bullets (the old National Match M1 Type, as demonstrated by A. A. Abbatiello in TAR) and as little as about a fifth of that for a short ogive flat base bullet in 6 PPC (Harold Vaughn's demo).

Whether you measure concentricity or not doesn't affect what it does on paper, so measurement isn't required, but it is probably desirable to mitigate what you can by whatever loading methods you use. I have more than one concentricity measuring device, and thus far, have not been able to get the Lee to perform up to the Redding–that sort of thing depends on the bullet and brass and other details–but I can get extremely close if I add in the step of using a Lyman M-die to put the little step in the mouth that gets the bullet to start straight into the die. Indeed, I've gotten my old RCBS standard seater to do just as well that way.

There is always more than one way to skin a cat.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 09:16 PM   #7
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unclenick View Post
Well, actually, I was aiming that at USAF Ret, since he raised the question about a seating die, and I wanted to provide some food for thought.

There is no blanket truth about the effect. If you have followed any of the stuff from Hornady or others on jacket symmetry and out-of-balance bullets, the effect of bullet tilt is exactly the same. It depends on the bullet design and how far forward of the geometric center of the bearing surface the particular design's center of gravity is. Opening of groups by up to 1.25 moa has been documented with long, short bearing surface bullets (the old National Match M1 Type, as demonstrated by A. A. Abbatiello in TAR) and as little as about a fifth of that for a short ogive flat base bullet in 6 PPC (Harold Vaughn's demo).

Whether you measure concentricity or not doesn't affect what it does on paper, so measurement isn't required, but it is probably desirable to mitigate what you can by whatever loading methods you use. I have more than one concentricity measuring device, and thus far, have not been able to get the Lee to perform up to the Redding–that sort of thing depends on the bullet and brass and other details–but I can get extremely close if I add in the step of using a Lyman M-die to put the little step in the mouth that gets the bullet to start straight into the die. Indeed, I've gotten my old RCBS standard seater to do just as well that way.

There is always more than one way to skin a cat.
I have been following hornady's podcasts of late. Have learned some really interesting stuff. I actually sent the OP the most recent one in dispersion as I thought he might find it interesting.

Hornady noted that several things can cause issues in relation to concentricity of the bullet in the barrel. From the center of gravity of the bullet being off due to manufacturing. To fouling in the bore causing it to not ride straight. To the barrel being bored unevenly, and when heated, allowing unburn powder to lodge on the bearing surface.

What I got out of F-class Johns video was, that with a good bullet, a well tuned load, and a good modern barrel, concentricity of the load is somewhat of a moot point unless you mess it up on purpose.

I was aiming at USAF retired as well. As I understand it he is trying to work up some practical hunting loads with limited components and wanted less trial and error in his seating depth adjustments. His question was about whether or not it would be useful for him to help him adjust his seating depth more easily. I have one, so I answered my with though on the die set and its adjustment. not sure exactly how we got on the topic of concentricity.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 10:29 PM   #8
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Got it in my Amazon cart ready for payday. I think having the dials to set seating depth with the OAL gauge measuring ogive will be very helpful.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 10:59 PM   #9
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
General hunting ammo has been loaded successfully on every kind of loading equipment made since the nineteenth century. Lee Loaders are especially economical for a hunting season-only cartridge you don't fire more than a handful of times a year. But seeking better seating adjustment control says you are looking to explore beyond that. In that case, why not have a look to compare features and their effects?

F-class John does a couple of things that confuse the issue a bit. One is that he is using very long bearing surface bullets. The longer the bullet bearing surface, the more entry into the bore straightens it into alignment with the bore axis. So his bullets are intrinsically more immune to being affected by bullet tilt than shorter ones are. The other thing, which is related, is the grossly tilted bullets he loaded brought nothing to the party. Even Abbatiello found nothing much over 0.004" tip tilt (0.008" TIR) had any additional effect on dispersion. It's the limit even for that sub-caliber bearing surface bullet, beyond which any additional initial tilt is straightened by entry into the bore. The bottom line is that whether you need to worry very much about concentricity depends on the bullet and the amount of dispersion contribution your type of shooting can tolerate.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 11:11 PM   #10
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Not sure about all the other conversation, but I like the idea of having the dial for measurement vs turning the screwdriver and guesstimating.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 11:20 PM   #11
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
It's a very convenient feature. Redding even makes a separate micrometer adjustment knob to retrofit their standard seaters that didn't come with one. It seems to me there were some other aftermarket ones for RCBS and other brands at one time, and may still be. One could certainly be made for the Lee dead length die, though unless you made it of very soft aluminum, it would not break loose like the Lee adjustment knob does if you accidentally jam something in too hard. But I'm not convinced that break-away feature is really needed in a seater anyway.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 23, 2023, 05:58 AM   #12
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,179
I’ve had good results with mine. IME it works as good as my Forster’s and I really love the side window feeding. Unfortunately it wouldn’t work with the one caliber I sort of bought it for, 7.62x39, but with everything else it’s good.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old February 23, 2023, 03:13 PM   #13
zeke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow9mm View Post
I know run-out does have an effect on loads, but I also always understood that the effect is minimal in the grand scheme of things. I don't have any tools to measure run-out. I have a hard time justifying buying the expensive tools so I can buy more expensive dies in the hopes that they provide reduced run out to gain a fraction of a moa of difference. I have been able to get sub moa groups and have never measured. But I am always trying to learn as well.

Johnnies reloading bench did a test on dies in relation to concentricity. Surprisingly the lee performed best if I remember correctly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIK5wq5vuSU

F-class John just did a video on run out. Found some interesting stuff doing some crazy run out between 0.003 to 0.045https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m8Y6ZmSBiU

I did read the article. interesting stuff. However based on Hornady's podcast here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yZyXwy40JM to be statistically significant you need to shoot about 20rnds. in this case only 10rnds were fired. And I personally feel testing with a bagged gun with an optic would have removed some variables compared to prone with iron sights.
A flat piece of glass or counter top can be used to see some degree of run out. Unless your brass is really mauled. Get your eyes down to surface level and roll a loaded round by. If you see some wobble, you may be able to improve the concentricity of your loaded rounds.

This works surprisingly well, and is FREE. Redding Comp seater dies enabled me to produce rounds with no discernible run out.
zeke is offline  
Old February 25, 2023, 08:09 AM   #14
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,424
Really like mine.
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old February 26, 2023, 12:46 AM   #15
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Just used mine for the first time tonight. Loading 308 with about 8 different seating depths I am testing. Saves so much time. It was a good purchase. Thanks all.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 26, 2023, 03:19 AM   #16
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,977
Glad you like it. Its a great value with all the different sizes being included in one set.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old February 26, 2023, 05:59 PM   #17
USAF Ret
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2017
Posts: 809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow9mm View Post
Glad you like it. Its a great value with all the different sizes being included in one set.
Just wish my testing was better. But, you know that.
USAF Ret is offline  
Old February 26, 2023, 07:54 PM   #18
berettaprofessor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2008
Posts: 1,091
I have one and have used it for loading cartridges that I don't have separate sets for; works but didn't see an improvement over runout vs. Lee dies.
__________________
"What most people forget is that the first country the Nazi's conquered was their own." 44AMP on thefiringline.com
berettaprofessor is offline  
Old February 26, 2023, 08:47 PM   #19
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by USAF Ret View Post
Just wish my testing was better. But, you know that.
All good things in time
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old March 7, 2023, 02:53 PM   #20
markr6754
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2018
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 347
Love this...have pretty much abandoned all other rifle seating dies..even those few with micrometers. As @Shadow9MM observed, some bullets take some finesse getting the meplat into the seating stem. I've learned to raise and lower (just slightly) the ram until the tip aligns to the stem. This issue is not observed in flat bottom bullets.

Using it for 300 BLK, 6mm ARC, 6.8 SPC, .223 Rem, and .224 Valkyrie
__________________
“Draw me not without reason, sheath me not without honor.”
markr6754 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05538 seconds with 10 queries