|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 8, 2007, 11:40 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 14, 2007
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 618
|
This does remind me of one of my high school teachers. He was a Vietnam Vet. Sometimes he would tell us about his time in Vietnam. He said: "They called us baby killers. Well, when a 12 year old is pointing or shooting an AK-47 at you, you are damn right that a trained soldier is going to shoot that kid!" ...And, I would agree.
|
October 8, 2007, 02:31 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: Lancaster Co, PA
Posts: 2,311
|
5 instances of insufficient condom use.
|
October 8, 2007, 02:42 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 389
|
wow
Quote:
__________________
"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." ---Colonel David Crockett Matt 6:33 |
|
October 8, 2007, 05:53 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 14, 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
I know of two stories where there was a "money or your life" situation and the victim complied and was shot and killed anyway. I would rather go down shooting and take someone with me than be shot hoping ill survive. |
|
October 8, 2007, 06:35 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: September 9, 2007
Location: in the shadows
Posts: 35
|
^ what he said
|
October 8, 2007, 06:40 PM | #31 | |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
|
|
October 8, 2007, 08:04 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 267
|
In Texas, you can use lethal force if you feel your life is in danger.
I dont care if there is a gun in my face, or a guy standing in my kitchen, or leaning in my car window, if I feel my life is in danger, I will shoot. I know I am not the only one who feels this way. Thats the beauty of these laws, you arent obligated to run away. If you FEEL you are in mortal danger, you can shoot. Who but me can dictate whether of not I feel I am in mortal danger? That brings me back to my original point, I dont care if you are trying to steal my television out of my living room or rape my wife, you are a potential threat to my safety, and I will react as such. |
October 8, 2007, 08:59 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2004
Posts: 405
|
Justme, I would advise you to join the forum, Texaschlforum.
You would learn a lot about Texas laws, it seems you know very little about them now. Even criminal mischief, if conducted after dark, is full justification to use deadly force to stop the crime, a misdemeanor or not. Texas has the majority of 28 million people who believe in this type of laws. |
October 8, 2007, 09:25 PM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: September 12, 1999
Location: tx, usa
Posts: 43
|
It's hard to find somebody I agree with in this thread. Some of you seem to think 'kids will be kids' and you should give them some leeway cause they're not really as dangerous, unfortunately that's not true any more. But there are others on here who sound like they would be willing to kill another person just to make the world a better place. At least that's what it sounds like to me, and that bothers me. I have the same problem with those people as I do with the gangbangers - - they don't have enough respect for human life to think that it would be a really big deal to take it away from somebody. Guess that attitude is getting even more widespread than I thought, that's kind of disheartening.
|
October 8, 2007, 09:56 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 267
|
Its disheartening that we have to resort to such things to protect our families and ourselves these days.....
You have the right to be born and to grow, but if you fail to assimilate and end up infringing on MY rights, you have surrendered your own. Yes, it is a sad world to live in, but we need to face the reality that there are a LOT of people out there who dont need to be alive, and you never know when they might just select you as a victim. |
October 8, 2007, 10:53 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: Lancaster Co, PA
Posts: 2,311
|
Well, sorry to disappoint you deguello, but somehow I don't think my wife would say "Oh, well so long as a kid killed my husband rather than an adult, I guess that's OK. I agree with you, he shouldn't have shot them and stayed alive. Sure, adult no problem, but not a kid." Would yours?
Last edited by Yellowfin; October 9, 2007 at 09:01 AM. |
October 8, 2007, 11:11 PM | #37 |
Junior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2007
Posts: 14
|
drinks & GalilARM: I also am from TX. Both of you make good points, but just because, criminal mischief at night, justifies the use of deadly force, doesn't mean you won't be charged and probably tried. GalilARM, you feel only you can determine if you feel threatened, but it is a jury (and more than likely not your peers) that will decide if you were justified or not. Remember, in either case you are going to spend thousands of dollars to defend yourself in court, and probably hundreds of thousands in civil court. Is my car stereo worth losing my home, my lifestyle and possibility my freedom? Not for me. You may win in criminal court on that one, but you will most likely loose in civil court.
I learned very quickly wearing a badge, that "Penal Code Law" as printed, and "Case Law", as applied are often quite different. And yes, it's sad that it has come to this. There's my $0.02, and that's what it's worth. |
October 8, 2007, 11:32 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 389
|
More proof that intelligence is not a requirement for computer usage
Quote:
__________________
"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." ---Colonel David Crockett Matt 6:33 |
|
October 9, 2007, 12:41 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 267
|
I think it kind of depends on the situation as well.....dead men cant talk, of course, so if youre dealing with one or two guys, it wouldnt be too hard to use lethal force and have a legitimate argument in support of your actions. However, when a bunch of people are involved, and you may only get a few of them, lethal force becomes a last resort. It's this type of case that presents the most problems. When there are "survivors", there are conflicting stories and conflicting motives. One survivor could easily say you provoked the conflict, and could land you in prison. I guess it all comes down to the individual situation. Were not cowboys, down here in Texas lookin for a shootout, but at the same time I know I that if I exercise my lethal-force rights carefully, I should be okay. Keyword should.....
|
October 9, 2007, 06:14 AM | #40 | |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Me read some laws? I am not the person who claimed that every state he knew of allowed the use of deadly force to protect property. I'd like to see case law on that one! Even in texas finding a jury who would support you for killing a kid for something like shoplifting would be difficult.
You guys seem to willfully misread my comments. I do not think "kids will be kids" at all, but recognise that in this particular situation a couple of dead kids would look bad in court or the front page of the newspaper. Since nobody was killed in this confrontation it seems to me that it was a decent, albeit scary, outcome. Quote:
|
|
October 9, 2007, 08:46 AM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2005
Posts: 2,536
|
Quote:
Yet the Ohio Constitution states: § 1.01 Inalienable Rights (1851) All men are, by nature, free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety. And: § 1.04 Bearing arms; standing armies; military powers (1851) The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power. The problem is that you can't cite your constitutional rights at a criminal trial. First you must stand trial under the ORC and then after conviction start the constitutional process. By the time you are able to bring that case to a high level, that is probably the supream court if they choose to hear it, you have spent many years in prison. Unless you have a couple million dollars for lawyer fees you'll get bled dry very quickly. Otherwise you're useing prison lawyers, which are other inmates. |
|
October 9, 2007, 09:33 AM | #42 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 389
|
You
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." ---Colonel David Crockett Matt 6:33 |
||
October 9, 2007, 09:51 AM | #43 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Whatever dude. Your implication is that there are indeed states which you have visited which condone lethal force for the protection of property. I simply pointed out that you are wrong. Since there are no such states you could not have visited them. Of course you admit your ignorance of the laws by stating, "that I know of", so why do you support your erroneous position so vociferously?
There may be states that allow the use of lethal force in the protection of property in specific instances, but not as a general practice. BTW, you could try being a bit more polite and humble, considering your general level of "knowledge" you might find it helpful in the long run. |
October 9, 2007, 10:49 AM | #44 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 389
|
Seriously? Why don't you go play somewhere else?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
By the way, the use of big kid words like vociferously, when preceeded by phrases like "whatver dude" show that you just opened a dictionary to make your post look smart. The fact of the matter is, you still DID NOT READ MY POST. Have a nice day.
__________________
"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." ---Colonel David Crockett Matt 6:33 Last edited by DougO83; October 9, 2007 at 10:55 AM. Reason: typos galore |
|||||
October 9, 2007, 11:02 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 389
|
justme
Quote:
I hate being right all the time. It gets old quick...
__________________
"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." ---Colonel David Crockett Matt 6:33 |
|
October 9, 2007, 11:49 AM | #46 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
|
It's been a long time since I've seen so many personal attacks in one thread . This one's closed for taking the lowest of roads.
Rather than send out numerous warnings by PM, I'll post one warning here. A number of you here are somewhat new to TFL, so maybe you didn't read the Forum Rules. If you haven't and want to remain members of The Firing Line, I strongly suggest you do so. The Firing Line isn't a kindergarten class. We post here as mature, polite adults. I'm not going to plead with, beg, or baby anyone here. Personal attacks and thinly veiled profanity will NOT be tolerated. Those of you responsible for the closing of this thread (and you know who you are), listen up: Do it again and I will ban you, no appeals, no second chances. Clear enough?
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you? I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do. --Capt. Charlie |
|
|