|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 30, 2016, 03:27 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 9, 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
|
38sp+P loads in 357 cases
I am not totaly new to reloading, however i find the more i learn the less i know. That being said i have 500 mt new 357 brass, and 125 grain Xtreme copper plated bullets, with a choice of Titegroup or HP-38. On recommendation from Xtreme bullets, they said use Speers published data, but keep on low end of scale for jacketed rounds. I did and used 7.6 grains of HP-38 , with a small primer @ 1.580col minimal lee crimp die. This is the minimum listed and works fine but seems a bit hot for target practice. (manageable out of a 6" 686, but hurts out of a snubnose) I do not yet have a crono so could not get a speed , but book says 1129 fps, well under 1300 fps recommended for plated bullets. My question is can i use 38+P load data in a 357 case and at what end of the scale? I do know that case volume has a lot to do with pressure and am not sure if 38+p data is even viable. Ultimately i am trying to find a light target load for my 357 brass, that is not at magnum velocities. Any recomendations would be appreciated.
|
December 30, 2016, 04:46 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
I would start either @ max for .38 or somewhere in between the .38 max and the .357 min you have tried already. How do the minimal loads with W231/HP38 compare to factory .357 ammo or even factory .38 special ammo? How do you know the load you have now is "a bit hot for target practice"?
|
December 30, 2016, 05:04 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: May 9, 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
|
Maybe a bit hot is incorrect nomenclature, what i meant to say is perceived recoil is more than a 38 sp fired from the same firearm. i am looking for a load that is a bit softer to shoot while still being able to use the 357 brass, with the components i have on hand.
|
December 30, 2016, 05:06 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
|
Yes, you can use 38 S. +P data in 357 M. brass. The velocity listed for the +P loads will be higher than what you'll get from the loads in 357 brass. If you are just paper punching and have no need for Magnum loads, just use wadcutter data, in the upper levels for 38 S., in 357 brass. I've been doing this for years...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast! I've learned how to stand on my own two knees... |
December 30, 2016, 05:57 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: May 9, 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
|
Duplicate post and cant find delete button
Last edited by SK1911; December 30, 2016 at 06:15 PM. Reason: duplicate posting |
December 30, 2016, 06:33 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
Keep it simple
Quote:
If your 7.6 grains of W231/HP-38 is a bit sharp for your liking/application, simply reduce the powder charge. No need to get all wrapped around the axle regarding +P load data, using a 357 case, yadda yadda yadda. Over thinking. Just turn it down.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
December 31, 2016, 12:21 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 9, 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
|
Thanks for the input. Common sense would seem to dictate all things being equal there would be no difference using 38+p load data in a 357 case as the firearm shoots both. However there are numerous warning out there about using to little powder in larger cases ( flash over). This was my concern, but on looking at Hogdons load data they list a 357 LRN at 5.5 grains with 1185 fps and a cup of 18800. So i would think that using about 6 grains would be a good starting point for plated flat points. side note 7.3 grains hp-38 shows a cup of 33800. at 1335 fps. The only difference is the bullets themselves and as stated in the original post im using plated flat points, which is not listed by Hogdon or any body else. Simple is always better, but safety is always first.
|
December 31, 2016, 01:12 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31, 2016, 02:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
A light target load for my 357 brass is any .38 Special load. Been loading cast and swaged 148 grain WC's with 2.5 of Bullseye in .357 cases for eons. Works just dandy.
+P is a pressure thing. Not velocity. You can forget +P altogether. Hasn't anything to do with what case you use. 7.6 grains of HP-38 is going to hurt out of a snub nose. It's a jacketed .357 load running a bit over 1335 fps. Use cast data, not the jacketed data.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
December 31, 2016, 02:17 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
Quote:
The two rounds will be apples n oranges. Which is why I mentioned in my first post to not overthink this. Just turn down your existing load by reducing the charge weight. Disregard 38 Special data (+P or otherwise) and work on adjusting your existing load. HP-38 can turn way down before becoming problematic. The possibility of a stuck bullet won't come into play until you're velocities are quite a bit below 600 f/s for jacketed - even less for lead (all this is assuming a healthy functioning revolver). As far as flashover goes, I believe that's a rifle thing. I've never heard of such a phenomenon in straight walled pistol cartridges. Not to completely dismiss; as anything is possible of course.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
December 31, 2016, 02:18 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
Quote:
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
December 31, 2016, 02:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
Thanks Nick.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
|
|