The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 29, 2009, 03:00 PM   #1
Dannyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 627
0.30 Cal Hornady BTHP National Match - any good for hunting?

Hi All,
In a month or so I am off to do some hunting. (Springbuk, Kudu and Oryx)
so far I have always used Hornady Interlocks 180Gr SP and BTSP.

At the moment there is a terrible shortage here, but I have some 0.30 Cal Hornady BTHP National Match.

Has anyone used them for hunting? How did they perform?

I will be shooting at ranges from 100 Meters to 250-300 .

If anyone of you has experience with these, please can you share it with me?

Thanks,
Danny
Dannyl is offline  
Old May 29, 2009, 03:05 PM   #2
Dannyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 627
I forgot to mention, I use a Remington 700, 30-06

I forgot to mention, I use a Remington 700, 30-06
Dannyl is offline  
Old May 30, 2009, 01:39 AM   #3
snuffy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2001
Location: Oshkosh wi.
Posts: 3,055
I don't know about Hornady match hollowpoints, but sierra matchkings have been used for hunting for a long time. Now, I know what sierra has to say about that, but I also know that a lot of people have hunted with them with great success.

The problem with a match hollow point is that they may NOT expand at all. The opening in the HP is so small, it can get plugged with hair or fat and not open up. Then you have in effect used a FMJ with just a caliber sized hole straight through an animal.

If it were me, I'd shoot some into water filled jugs, around here, I use gallon milk jugs. If they bust a jug, like a soft point exposed lead bullet, I'd think they'd expand on a small medium sized animal.
__________________
The more people I meet, the more I love my dog

They're going to get their butts kicked over there this election. How come people can't spell and use words correctly?
snuffy is offline  
Old May 30, 2009, 05:44 AM   #4
MuscleGarunt
Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2009
Posts: 75
Mammals are not bullet proof. If you shoot it in the right place it's going to die.
MuscleGarunt is offline  
Old May 30, 2009, 08:15 AM   #5
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Quote:
(Springbuk, Kudu and Oryx)
We have imported Oryx in the US. These are 700 pound animals, not the 120-150 pound deer that most Americans are familiar.

Would anyone recommend using match bullets on Griz?

I would not use any thin jacketed target bullet on any African animals. I have had on one deer, the core separate from the jacket of a Norma hunting round. Likely it was a small deer, not some massive beastie, so it did not go far. That convinced me that bullet integrity was important.

Find the proper bullets.
Slamfire is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 12:26 AM   #6
Dannyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 627
Thanks for your replies, problem solved

Hi All,
thanks for replying.
In the meatime I have managed to get 100 BTSP Hornady 180Gr interlocks.

I have used these before and they are accurate & reliable.

Regards,
Danny
Dannyl is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 04:50 AM   #7
darkgael
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,473
BTHP

The BTHP bullet mentioned is a match type bullet. The HP design is to improve it's flight characteristics - drag, etc. It is not designed to expand. It would (will/does) make a .30 cal hole in whatever is shot.
"Good shot placement" is, of course, the ideal but it is an expression often used to justify a marginal shooting choice. You can kill a moose with a .22 short, a poacher's trick on a swimming animal, a brain shot. You can kill a wild boar with a .177 caliber pellet gun - it's been done - with good shot placement. Does that mean that hunting with a .177 pellet gun is a good idea? The .30 cal rifle is certainly a step up from those examples but the BTHP bullet is still a marginal as opposed to optimal choice. (and then there is the solid bullet - no expansion. What about that you might ask?)
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
The BTSP is a way better choice.
Pete
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ...
NRA Life Member
darkgael is offline  
Old May 31, 2009, 11:02 AM   #8
Dannyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 627
Choice of bullets

Hi,
First, I need to clarify something; I am very careful in making sure that I use the right bullet for hunting. So far, the Hornady interlocks have worked perfectly on anything from Kudus to Impalas, and I was not about to experiment with the match bullets unless I had positive feedback from someone who had used them successfully.

I agree with those who say that animals are not bullet proof, but disagree with the presumption that shot placement is all that counts.

I spent too many years in the wrong neighbourhood back in the early 80's and I have seen more than one person surviving after being shot in the lungs with a non-expanding 0.30 or 0.223 bullet. An animal shot with a bullet that does not ( at least) incapacitate it immediatly may run a good distance before falling, and it will die slowly and painfully.

I am greateful to all of you who responded.

Regards,

Danny
Dannyl is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06430 seconds with 10 queries