|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 22, 2023, 11:08 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: April 3, 2013
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 59
|
.308 light hunting load - anyone got one?
I just won a Ruger American Predator in .308. I would like to work up a lighter than normal load for deer hunting and looking to load a Sierra Prohunter 150. The reason for this is I hunt a brushier area and my longest shot might be about 100 yards. I have shot a 30-30 all my life and feel it is a fantastic deer rifle that kills but does not mutilate: I've taken way more than my fair share of deer with it. I have seen deer shot with .308 and .30-06 loads and they do some major damage and blood shock a whole lot of meet. If you hit a front shoulder, that shoulder is worthless. I have always liked the .308 round and would love to hunt deer with it (my grandson wants to hunt with as well). I once read that you can load a .30-06 or .308 down to 30-30 specs with H4895, but can't find any specifics on it. I load for pistols, but am just now getting into rifle reloading (my brother always reloaded my 30-30 ammo for me). Anyone have info or any ideas? Thanks.
Last edited by alancac98; November 22, 2023 at 11:26 PM. |
November 22, 2023, 11:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2022
Posts: 342
|
I do some hand loading with IMR 3031 and 308 Winchester with reduced powder charges and cast lead bullets. I looked at load data for the 30/40 krag and 300 Savage I used that as starting loading data and worked my way up until the group's opened up. I have no idea if they will perform on game I am only shooting paper targets at 50 yards.
|
November 23, 2023, 12:35 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,769
|
What about using the barns 130 grain all copper bullets for your hunting loads in 308. A monolithic bullet will not blow up like a lead core soft tip and 130 grain loads should reduce some recoil.
|
November 23, 2023, 01:01 AM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,870
|
Look in your reloading manuals, and look at the .308 Win starting loads.
with a 150gr bullet, starting loads are in the 2500fps range. Max loads are in the 27-2800fps range. The starting load might be the level you're looking for. If its still too hot, most of the medium burn rate powders will reduce pretty safely you should have no trouble backing the .308 down to .300 Savage levels or even less. The manuals are all geared to getting the most out of the rounds, not the least, so published data is scarce. Whether or not reduced loads will be accurate in your gun, I can't say. Generally light loads tend to be accurate, but each gun and ammo combination is unique to itself and only shooting will show what it actually does.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
November 23, 2023, 04:50 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,459
|
I'm heading for Hyner tomorrow. My advice is load up some 180 cup-and-core bullets.
|
November 23, 2023, 05:40 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
|
I have used the H4895 reduced loads and they have shot quite accurately. Go with the 130gr Barnes or the 150-170gr RN for the 30-30.
Follow the instructions on this link, H4895 Reduced Recoil Loads
__________________
LAter, Mike / TX |
November 23, 2023, 05:56 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,426
|
Typical starting load of H4895 for a 150 is 37 grains over a LR Primer for around 2500fps.
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM. |
November 23, 2023, 12:50 PM | #8 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,870
|
Quote:
Those bullets are built to give decent, controlled expansion at .30-30 MV speeds and less (velocity at 100-150 yds, etc). Generally speaking they will still perform well when velocity is a couple hundred feet faster, but more than that and you will see issues. I can tell you from personal experiments that a .30-30 bullet, pushed up to 28-3000fps does not expand like a deer bullet, it "grenades" like a varmint bullet. The same sort of thing happens to .357 125gr JHPs fired from carbines at max speeds. Every expanding bullet has a range of velocity it works inside of. To low, it doesn't expand. Too high, it expands too much, too fast aka "grenades". You might call the bullet maker and get that information from them. Its usually not in the published data.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
November 23, 2023, 02:05 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,297
|
I'll second that. You can't launch a 180gr fast enough from a 308 to "grenade". The heavier bullet will mushroom a little and blow right through a deer.
|
November 23, 2023, 03:22 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2022
Posts: 342
|
The loading data on hodgdons website for 308 Winchester and 110 Grain bullets is very interesting. Most of the starting loads are between 2,800 to 3,000 feet per second. Is the Barnes ttsx bullet strong enough to not explosively fragment if shot that fast at close range at a deer?
|
November 23, 2023, 04:55 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,803
|
"If your concern is excessive bullet "blow up" DO NOT run the 150-170gr .30-30 bullets in rounds significantly faster than .30-30. You will NOT be happy with the results, if you do."
I'll second that motion. I used to hunt the Northwest corner of California a very long time ago. Rifle most of the time was an 18" barreled 1903 Springfield with peep sight. Load of choice was a 170 gr. 30-30 bullet at a bit over 2400 FPS.Very messy. Most shot were not much more than 25 to maybe a 50 yards "long" shot but the upshot was drop that deer now. If they ran off, odds are they were lost. This was way back in the late 1950s early 1960s just prior to me entering military service in late 1960. I don't remember the exact loads but it was a 30-06 with 180 gr. round nose, usually Sierras at roughly 2400/2450 FPS. Still some meat damage but but tolerable. You should be able to come close to that level in a .308 using H4895. Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! |
November 23, 2023, 05:48 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,382
|
When Springfield brought out the M1a they use to include suggested accuracy loads using Speer 130 gr HPs. / IMR-4895. Loaded for M1a with good results. In mypre 64 M70 Win FW they were “ nail drivers “ literally. With 6x Leupold off rest you could shoot the heads off the roofing nails holding target. From that day on was my standard deer load in that rifle. Bullet expands well at approx. 2800fps.
|
November 24, 2023, 03:03 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: April 3, 2013
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 59
|
Thanks for the replies everyone. I looked up the Hodgdon site concerning using the 60% of max load as a start point. I was definitely thinking of using a 30-30 170 gr. bullet to load and this helps a lot: H4895 seems like a great place to start the journey. My concern with using lighter bullets such as the 110-130 gr. bullets would be the potential for ricocheting off limbs and such. The area is pretty thick with some small openings up on top of the hill, but there is a real nice opening from an old tram road that goes down over to a creek. You can never tell where the deer will be so I have to have a load that will work for both areas. Looks like a spring/summer type of thing where I can borrow a buddies chronograph to check velocities. Yeah, I have heard bad things about pushing a 30-30 bullet too fast, so I want to try and keep it to standard loaded velocities from manufacturers.
|
November 24, 2023, 11:09 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,318
|
Loads
I can not advise the load, but I used the 30-30 170gr bullet in .308 loaded down for a youth about 20 yrs ago. I do recall the velocity was in the 2400 fps range. The family I loaded them for claimed they dropped deer well.
I also have a 30-06 carbine, a miserable kicker, that I down load 180 RN slugs to about 2450 fps and it seems a reliable stopper as well. Both of those loads mirror to a certain degree the old .300 Savage. Any loading manual should provide you with data to drive either of those slugs to that velocity in .308. Dropping to 150 gr RN/FN bullets in the same velocity range would reduce recoil even more and just slightly exceed 30-30 velocity and performance. I'll add that ANY bullet v. a tree limb or twig will deflect, regardless of bullet weight. Moderate velocity and extreme weight (think 12 ga slug) might help a wee bit v. light weight and extreme velocity, but the best policy is to avoid shots through the thick stuff. As much as I hate to say it, the old "brushbuster" theory is mostly myth. My own experience is a good, clear 'scope in about 6X allows you to pick holes and windows where one can sometimes drive a bullet to your target. Finally, I picked up the same rifle as the OP, the short Ruger Predator in .308 as a blem a few years back and it has become one of my favorite workhorse deer rifles. It carries easily while wearing a simple Leupold 1.5-4X. I load the rifle with my standard load of 45 gr of 4064 and the Sierra 150 gr ProHunter. From the stuffy bolt rifle, it reaches 2650 and groups well from the Ruger as well as my other .308's. |
November 26, 2023, 08:49 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 338
|
A good .308 light load I’ve had good luck with was a 125 gn Nosler BT and Varget.
Light recoil and very accurate. You could use a Barnes 130 grain bullet and achieve the same result. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
November 26, 2023, 04:10 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Light bullets will reduce recoil. Less penetration than a heavier one is the trade-off.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 26, 2023, 05:24 PM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2020
Posts: 3
|
25.0grs of 2400 and a 150gr Hornady 3035 have worked great for my daughter in law this year. 2 deer bang flop.
|
November 26, 2023, 05:56 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2017
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 243
|
I am thinking that 2300 fps is a good target if you want to shoot a 170 gr 30-30 bullet at 30-30 velocities.
Using 4895 will certainly work, but it is one of the more difficult powders to obtain right now. I ran Quickload to look for other similar powders and came up with the following list that I would think about as possible alternates. CAUTION: The following post (or a page linked to) includes or discusses loading data not covered by currently published sources of tested data for this cartridge (QuickLOAD or Gordon's Reloading Tool data is not professionally tested). USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assumes any liability for any damage or injury resulting from the use of this information. Code:
Cartridge : .308 Win. (SAAMI) Bullet : .308, 170, Hornady FP 3060 Useable Case Capaci: 50.181 grain H2O = 3.258 cm³ Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm Barrel Length : 18.0 inch = 457.2 mm Powder type Filling/Loading Ratio Charge Charge Vel. Prop.Burnt P max P muzz B_Time % Grains Gramm fps % psi psi ms --------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- IMR 4895 87.7 40.5 2.63 2300 93.8 40167 10012 1.158 IMR 3031 87.5 37.8 2.45 2300 99.2 39186 9540 1.164 Accurate 2200 85.5 40.1 2.60 2300 92.9 43580 9456 1.112 Hodgdon H4895 85.5 39.5 2.56 2300 94.9 41252 9770 1.146 Ramshot Wild Boar 84.5 41.7 2.70 2300 94.0 41210 9783 1.138 Accurate 2015 83.9 37.1 2.41 2300 100.0 43900 8738 1.132 Alliant Reloder-12 83.2 39.3 2.54 2300 99.3 43110 9031 1.119 Ramshot X-Terminator *C 83.1 41.0 2.66 2300 94.8 43581 9417 1.118 Hodgdon H322 82.4 37.0 2.40 2300 99.1 41825 9185 1.130 Accurate 2230 81.8 41.0 2.65 2300 95.8 43129 9414 1.132 |
November 26, 2023, 10:06 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Transplanted to Ridgeland,SC
Posts: 606
|
308 light loads
I just took a look at Lee's modern reloading and a load that stands out for a 150 gr jacketed bullet is 46.0 gr of IMR 4350 for 2,415 fps and only 36,600 cup pressure. It is listed as both beginning and max load. That would almost duplicate a 30-30 load to a "T". It would be a lower pressure load by 308 standards so wear on your brass would be minimal as well.
|
March 25, 2024, 05:35 AM | #20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2020
Posts: 6
|
With the 308 and the bullet you have chosen, most of the loads are going to be at the top end of the bullets ability to stay in one lump if you hit any large bone.
If you want to match 30/30 ballistics my recommendation, based on what I've done in my gun with my powders etc, is buy some semi hard cast gas checked boolits with a flat meplat and use 2400, start at 18 grains and work up to 21 max. This will give around 2000 - 2200 fps with that cast boolit. Accuracy, out of my 20" BLR 81 308 is great.In the grand scheme of things the cast boolits will be cheaper than the jacketed ones and you can use them in the 30/30 (my mod 94 win shoots around 2000 fps with them and 17.5 grains of 2400 with minute of deer accuracy). Not too noisy little recoil. Just remember to tumble lube them a couple of times with a good squirt of liquid alox. After you've loaded the cartridges wipe the nose of the bullets clean with white spirit to avoid picking up pocket fluff etc. It's good practice for parenting too when your kids have colds.cast 2.jpghttps://thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=116789&stc=1&d=1711365221 Last edited by Braddock VC; March 25, 2024 at 06:14 AM. |
March 25, 2024, 06:17 AM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2020
Posts: 6
|
Forgot to say, in previous post I uploaded a couple of images, these were of cartridges with 163 grn boolit gc with 16 grains of 2400, about 15 - 1600 fps, ok for accurate plinking out to maybe 100 yards but definitely not recommended for hunting deer, add 2 -5 more grains of 2400 and it's a whole different matter.
|
March 25, 2024, 07:57 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,334
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2024, 07:59 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,334
|
For light loads, I would fiddle around in Quickload for a 110gr Hammer at 2700fps that still gets 45000 psi. With >90%, but less than 100% fill.
|
March 27, 2024, 09:41 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,250
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
March 28, 2024, 01:08 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,297
|
I have used, (via the grandkids), the 125gr Nosler Ballistic Tip, @2650fps - 20" barrel, on mule deer. Both at under 200 yds. Deer in the freezer without fuss. I loaded them using H4895.
My goal was to give the grandkids a low recoil deer zapper, and I was happy with the results. Later I turned that load up to 3000fps and a bear and more deer went into the freezer - one was a 250yd shot. Again, that 125gr ballistic tip made pretty mushrooms (or we didn't recover them). All that was done with a cheap Mossberg kids rifle. Now the kids only want zap things with unobtaniumridiculouslyexpensive 165gr Nosler Accubonds launched out of a Sig Cross rifle. So I've worked up loads for that gun and the kids & grandkids have put deer, bear and elk in the freezer (longest shot was 360yds). The 308 is a versatile cartridge. And pre-covid the ammo was cheap. |
|
|