October 28, 2013, 06:47 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 28
|
Ruger 22/45 suppressor
I don't know if this is the right forum for this..I recently purchased a Ruger 22/45 with the threaded barrel and I've been watching videos on YouTube of how well the shoot supressed. Does anyone know of a well made suppresesor that won't break the bank since I also will end up paying the $200 tax stamp fee.
|
October 28, 2013, 11:30 PM | #2 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Silencerco Sparrow.
Well-made & easy to break down for cleaning. I like mine, average sound reduction of about 36 DB. You can find some slightly quieter, but the Sparrow gets the job done. Denis |
October 29, 2013, 12:53 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2012
Posts: 331
|
Guns & Ammo magazine http://www.gunsandammo.com/2013/09/2...lencer-review/
- The front page is of a silencer available in .22lr, .223,.308, 9mm from Sig Sauer. http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProdu...lr-sig-sd.aspx |
October 29, 2013, 03:22 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Considering this is about silencers, it should be in the NFA forum.
I love the Sparrow, but if the primary host is a pistol I'd get a Spectre II. The Sparrow is super-quiet, but the Spectre is slightly quieter (especially on a pistol) and has much less first round pop; that's the main disadvantage of a monocore design like the Sparrow: more first round pop (the first shot is noticeably louder than subsequent shots; this is especially noticeable when shooting the Sparrow on a pistol). The Sparrow is slightly easier to clean than the Spectre and is shorter (but slightly wider). And considering I've never seen a .22 can that was easier to take apart when dirty, the Sparrow a great can and I would love to have one. But the Spectre is cheaper, almost as easy to take apart and clean, has less first round pop, and is slightly quieter, so I'd choose the Spectre if I could only have one .22 can.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
October 29, 2013, 10:41 AM | #5 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
I know there are other preferences, but that first-round-pop issue has no importance to me.
Not all that much difference. I like the convenience of the Sparrow & you're not going to get "Hollywood Quiet" anyway. The Sparrow allows use of the sights & reduces the sound enough to shoot without plugs, which is all I care about. Does not affect accuracy, velocity, or point of aim. Denis |
October 29, 2013, 12:22 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Like I said, I'd love to have one. But I think I'd buy a Spectre first.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
October 29, 2013, 03:11 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
The Sparrows FRP is quickly, and easily done away with, with a short spritz of water from a nasal spray bottle. Sure, it should be mentioned when comparing suppressors, but its a non-issue.
|
October 29, 2013, 03:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 819
|
The Huntertown Arms Guardian is another great rimfire suppressor to consider with the specific criteria you identified. They are a well constructed can with an exceptionally good warranty at a great price as well.
|
October 29, 2013, 07:35 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
|
Innovative Arms Apex rimfire suppressor, MSRP $299 but I got even better pricing from one of their local dealers: http://allenarmstactical.com/rimfire.php
|
October 29, 2013, 10:27 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
And I agree that it's a non-issue for many people, but for some people it IS an issue and they don't want to have to bother with the spray; they just want it to be quieter for the first shot. It just comes down to personal preference; for most people it's a non-issue and for some it's an issue.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
October 29, 2013, 10:34 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 229
|
I opted for the Sparrow, for the exact same pistol to start with.
The Sparrow was $250 and I thought that was pretty reasonable. |
October 29, 2013, 10:44 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2011
Location: RI
Posts: 795
|
Another vote for the sparrow, own one and its a great little can.For shooting dirty .22 ammo I don't think you will find a more functional design.
Good luck with whichever you choose but be very careful, they are like pringles. NO ONE gets just one suppressor!
__________________
Love my guns |
October 29, 2013, 11:07 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Man I wish we could use suppressors here in Ohio.
|
October 30, 2013, 12:19 AM | #14 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Theo,
I didn't say there was NO difference between FRP & subsequent shots, just not all that MUCH difference. I don't use mine as a spook assassination tool, I just wanted a .22 pistol I can shoot without earplugs. For me, that FRP has no importance whatever. For others, it does. In testing it at Silencerco's sound lab, we tried the water trick. Works, but not worth bothering with, for me. Denis |
October 30, 2013, 12:32 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
I've agonized over getting the Sparrow or the Spectre for a while now. I've shot them both a lot, taken each one apart when dirty, and used them on various hosts. I'm currently settled on the Spectre (when I get enough funds), but that could change. It doesn't help that I've played with and taken apart (but not shot) the new Tactical Solutions Axiom and it seems like an excellent design; it's got the great baffle design of the AAC Element 2 and the ease of disassembly of the Sparrow. The problem is that it's new enough that they're aren't many reviews on it yet. Right now I'm able to postpone my decision because I'm using my Octane 9 for a .22 suppressor; it's quieter than any .22 suppressor on the market but it's also a lot bigger. I need a .22 can.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
October 30, 2013, 08:20 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: July 11, 2012
Location: CinSity,NV
Posts: 86
|
I agree with Theohazard on the Spectre II, the way it was designed the carbon does not get build up on the inside of the can which makes it easy for the baffles to come out for cleaning. On other cans the build up can be so great you might need a wooden dowel to pound it out if you don't clean it often. JMO
|
October 30, 2013, 12:48 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 28
|
I really like the sparrow from everything I've researched now my only problem is finding a dealer to purchase one. The local shops here are not the best at getting things like that. This might be a dumb question but can u purchase directly through manufacturer?
|
October 30, 2013, 01:34 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2008
Location: Hoschton, Ga.
Posts: 726
|
Here is my Ruger 22/45 Lite with SS Sparrow.
Yes there is a pretty good FRP but not a big deal for me. If you can, get a suppressor with stainless steel insides, should last longer than the typical aluminum cans. BTW thats the difference between a Sparrow and a SS Sparrow, also many of the cheaper cans use aluminum as baffles material which lead corrodes faster.....or so I'm told. I bought my SS Sparrow for $400 plus tax plus NFA tax.
__________________
Nov 2, 2011 sent form 4, SS Sparrow. Arrived May 29, 2012. Jan 30, 2012 sent form 1 for SBR. Arrived July 12, 2012 Jan 22, 2013 Sent form 4, 762-SDN-6. Arrived Sept 13, 2013 |
October 30, 2013, 01:49 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
So all this means that if your online shop or your LGS's distributor has a Sparrow all ready to ship, it's still going to take at least three months until your LGS receives it and you can even start your Form 4 paperwork that's taking at least 9 months to come in right now. So if you're looking to get this suppressor as quickly as possible, you have to find a dealer that has one in stock. Make sure they actually have one; lots of shops will act like they do, but then they just add yours to an order, wait a few months until the order is big enough for a bulk discount, then they order a bunch of suppressors from their distributor all at once, which will then take an additional three months to come in thanks to the Form 3 delay. Also, it's very unlikely you're going to find a current-generation Sparrow for $250 like OcelotZ3 mentioned in Post #11; that's WAY below most dealer's wholesale cost. MSRP is $499.99 and you're usually not going to pay much less than that at most stocking dealers. You can get a better price if you order it online or have a non-stocking dealer add it to a bulk order, but that means you're waiting a LOT longer for it.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
October 30, 2013, 02:46 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 28
|
Thanks a lot theohazard and everyone else for the info you have all helped me make a decision and I appreciate it now just gotta get one cuz it's eating at me to start shooting suppressed.
|
October 30, 2013, 10:24 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
|
|
October 31, 2013, 07:52 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Quote:
Are they legal without having a class three lic. ? What kind of hoops do we have to jump thru to own them? Too, do you happen to have any reference on the laws? I just always thought(apparently ignorantly) that suppressor's were illegal in Ohio and therefore don't know much about them. But would love to get one for a .22 to shoot varmints here at night. Last edited by shortwave; October 31, 2013 at 08:14 AM. |
|
October 31, 2013, 09:15 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Shortwave: the whole "you need a class 3 license to own a silencer" myth is just that; a myth. Check out my list of common silencer myths over in the NFA forum. It has some of the other info you were looking for as well.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
October 31, 2013, 10:49 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Thanks Theo... will do.
And Thank you as well weblance for putting my boots on the right feet. |
October 31, 2013, 10:59 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Theohazard
After viewing your post you referred me to, I must say that you did a superb job with the post. Very informative, well written and a pleasure to read. Kudo's to ya and... ... Thanks again. |
|
|