The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 30, 2015, 09:44 PM   #1
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,124
Wildcat Round

I'm seeking information about what must be a wildcat round. I have a 300 Weatherby case necked down to a 224 caliber, complete with bullet but no powder or primer. On firing a round, such as this, I can't imagine how this bullet would remain in one piece coming out of the muzzle of a gun chambered for it but, then again, this may be someone's idea of a joke cartridge.

Any thoughts?

Never trust a woman with a tattoo of a dagger anywhere on her body.
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 05:08 AM   #2
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,439
Most high velocity bullets "self-destruct" because of centrifugal forces.
Since centrifugal force can be controlled by the designer, via twist rate and velocity, it's easy to negate the "mid-air lead puff".

All else being equal:
As velocity increases, twist rate decreases (slower twist).
As twist rate increases, velocity decreases.

That's why .22-250s and .220 Swifts often have 1:12" or 1:14" rates of twists, while .223 Rem, .222 Rem Mag, and similar cartridges are more commonly found with 1:7" to 1:10" twist rates. The reason for the difference is velocity.


With a little bit of digging in my library, I found a reference to the cartridge being used by some guys in Georgia, trying to break 5,500 fps. After determining what the maximum load would be, they ran pressures up to 68,000 psi and could only reach 4,900 fps. The throat was completely fried with fewer than 20 full pressure loads fired. (So, it's definitely not great for longevity.)
They tried pushing the cartridge to 70k psi, but "encountered brass flow issues."
No type or weight is mentioned for bullet or powder, so I'm not sure if that would be a realistic maximum for the cartridge, or just for their set of parameters.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 09:24 AM   #3
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,124
FrankenMauser, thanks for the information.
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 02:55 PM   #4
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
Sounds like somebody tried to make a .224 Weatherby Mag without actually knowing what it is. Same case but shorter.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 03:10 PM   #5
jaguarxk120
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,620
The 224 Weatherby was made on it's own unique case. No other caliber used that case.
jaguarxk120 is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 08:45 PM   #6
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,124
Gents,

I must correct my original statement. The bullet size for this wildcat round is 250, not .224. Yes, I know Weatherby has its own belted .224 round and 7mm and 270 and 340 and others.
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old May 1, 2015, 11:31 PM   #7
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,439
Sounds like .257 Weatherby. ...Or a formed .257 Weatherby case with a .251" handgun bullet stuffed in it?

Quote:
Sounds like somebody tried to make a .224 Weatherby Mag without actually knowing what it is. Same case but shorter.
Very much not the same case, at all.
.224 Weatherby Mag is a unique case. It is a belted case with an '06-diameter case head. There's nothing else like it, which is why Norma and Weatherby charge an arm, a leg, 7 toes, and your first born for 20 pieces of brass.

.220 Weatherby Rocket (predecessor to the .224 Wby Mag) was a different case, as well. It was a modified .220 Swift (itself a 6mm Lee Navy with the rim turned to 0.473").
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old May 2, 2015, 07:32 AM   #8
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,294
A little off topic,but something to consider.Folks often want to build the "ultimate".Necking down the biggest case they can find is one expression of that drive.
When the powder is ignited,it starts making hot gas.Pressure climbs,so does heat,powder burns faster.

Something has to give.If you had no bore/bullet,you would have a closed bomb.Something would give!!

But since we do have a bullet traveling down the bore,the pressure is moderated by an increase in the geometric volume of the combustion chamber.
The bore volume behind the bullet is a part of the combustion chamber volume.
The area of the diameter of the bullet,the old pi x the square of the radius formula,times the length determines how rapidly,(or not!) the combustion chamber volume increases.Or,how rapidly the pressure is moderated.

And ,of course,if the handloader takes advantage of that large case with a large volume of powder,Large volume of powder makes large volume of gas.

It gets very touchy for the handloader to pursue performance with extremely overbore cartridges.When the gas production outruns the bore expansion,bad things happen.

The other problem is A large charge of slow burning powder has a long ,hot flame duration funneled through a small steel throat,Bore erosion is rapid.

Myself,I have no interest in extreme overbore cartridges.

IMO,in most cases,they indicate someone has a lot to learn.
HiBC is offline  
Old May 2, 2015, 07:58 AM   #9
Bucksnort1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2013
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 1,124
FrankenMauser,

This is not the .257 Weatherby. The head stamp clearly indicates this is a 300Weatherby case. If I can figure out how to make my photos smaller for attaching to these responses, I'll attach a photo of the loaded .250 round and one of its head stamp.
Bucksnort1 is offline  
Old May 2, 2015, 03:15 PM   #10
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Could be like many other wildcat cartridges.
257 Weatherby may be hard to come by, or the casings at least.
While the 300 Weatherby is fairly common.
Take 300 casing, neck to .257 and taaa daa... New 257 cartridge.

Take 257Roberts for instance. Since those casings are hard to find, and fairly expensive, I purchased 100 casings for the 7mm Mauser, and necked them down. (how it was originally done way back when)...
std7mag is offline  
Old May 2, 2015, 09:36 PM   #11
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,439
Quote:
FrankenMauser,

This is not the .257 Weatherby. The head stamp clearly indicates this is a 300Weatherby case. If I can figure out how to make my photos smaller for attaching to these responses, I'll attach a photo of the loaded .250 round and one of its head stamp.
My 6x45mm cartridges "clearly indicate" that they are .223 Remington. ...But that doesn't mean anything except that, at one point in time, the case was manufactured as .223 Remington. Since then, it has been modified to suit my needs and accept a 6mm projectile.


Many cases are formed, or can be formed, from other cartridges.
.257 Weatherby and .300 Weatherby are both based on the .300 H&H case (along with hundreds of other 'standard' and wildcat cartridges).

.257 Weatherby is readily formed from .300 Weatherby by trimming the case and carefully (and incrementally) running it into a sizing die - or, better yet, a set of form dies.

How long is the case?
.257 Weatherby should have a case length of 2.539-2.549".
.300 Weatherby should have a case length of 2.815-2.825".
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old May 2, 2015, 11:52 PM   #12
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
It requires .315 trimming to neck a .300 WBY down to a .257 WBY. The visual difference in the cartridges is MOST obvious. The .300/.257 WBY is a wildcat that has been around for decades.
reynolds357 is offline  
Old May 3, 2015, 09:43 AM   #13
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
The difference in length may not be as obvious to some as to others...

I have seen a guy at the range struggling to get the bolt closed on his rifle. Kept pushing, and pushing. Wouldn't close.
I walked over to see what was up.
He handed me the rifle, I opened the bolt, and a 30-06 cartridge came out of his 308 rifle...

I'm not suggesting the OP is such a person, just that it does indeed happen.
std7mag is offline  
Old May 4, 2015, 01:28 AM   #14
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,439
Seeing as how the OP is currently active and posting in other threads, even multiple .300 Weatherby threads, but has not come back to this one... I believe he may have given up on us.


Just so we're clear about the point that I was trying to make:
Headstamps mean nothing, once the case is removed from its original context (bag of factory brass, box of ammo, etc.). Once a case hits the dirt or concrete floor of a range... it's whatever a reloader wants it to be.

This case, for example, clearly indicates that it is .40 S&W; but it is plainly obvious that something isn't quite right.
...because it is actually a .44 caliber (.432") bullet that was used to take a bull elk.


Cool side note: That little chunk of lead in the primer pocket wasn't there when it was fired. There was still a fired primer in it. The lead was actually extruded through the flash hole, ejecting the primer in the process, when the bullet impacted the animal.



__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07430 seconds with 10 queries