|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 23, 2017, 07:45 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 40
|
Prima V, Ba 9.5 & N320 chrono comparison (9mm minor)
I've spent the past several weeks testing out different loads, powders and bullets. Here's a summary of my results. All the tests were at least a 10-shot string (most are 15) and shot from a CZ SP01. OAL for TCG bullet is ~1.070 and RN are ~1.10.
In short the Prima V has variability in particle size, however it meters (in my Dillon 650) a bit better than the N320 but not enough to choose one over the other. The Prima V is a touch smokier, but half the cost. I'd definately consider using Prima V if N320 is not available. The Ba 9.5 powder is a very consistent small, almost disk shaped powder (similar to N320, but small particles) but is not as close of a match to N320 when comparing powder charge vs. velocity. Not very much smoke from the Ba9.5 either. Note: these are MY results from MY gun, you need to work up your own loads, using the powder manufacturer's data, not mine. Last edited by muncie21; February 23, 2017 at 08:01 PM. |
February 25, 2017, 06:28 PM | #2 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 10, 2016
Posts: 846
|
Thanks for sharing muncie21,
Not many People here do us the favour sharing their data. Here a few rounds I chronod myself: Quote:
Last edited by TheGuyOfSouthamerica; February 25, 2017 at 10:10 PM. |
|
February 25, 2017, 10:06 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 40
|
@TheGuyOfSouthamerica all of my bullets (thus far) are hi-tek coated lead.
|
|
|