May 8, 2011, 07:21 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: July 18, 2009
Location: Searcy Co. Arkansas
Posts: 24
|
H-Varget or Varget
My various manuals lists Varget or H Varget. Are they both made by Hodgon and is there a difference? H Varget uses a starting load of 47 grains while 49 is the beginning load for Varget. Just rebuilt a 1903 Springfield with a serial number 626xxx. It's be fired since the 1st WW so I don't think there is a pressure. Just doing it right. Thanks
Bob R |
May 8, 2011, 07:26 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,426
|
Varget is only made by Hodgdon.
|
May 8, 2011, 07:40 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,602
|
One and the same powder.
They are one and the same powder. Varget is Varget. It is made by Hodgdon. When a manual lists H Varget, they mean Hodgdon's Varget.
__________________
............ |
May 8, 2011, 07:45 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: March 5, 2005
Location: HSV
Posts: 98
|
Just FYI - Varget is a Hogdon brand name for a standard Australian powder it is sold by Hogdon but not made by Hogdon (if they make anything at all).
|
May 8, 2011, 07:52 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Different manuals list different loads based on using different bullets, primers, cases, and test chamber/rifle. Pick one closest to your components and begin with starting loads.
Varget is a great powder, especially for medium loads used in M1 Garands or older rifles (150 gr - 168 gr bullets). H4895 is a versatile powder especially for reduced loads. Both seem pretty consistent and reliable. Slower powders are probably better for heavier bullets, or faster velocities, but I don't load for them.
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition." - James Madison
|
May 8, 2011, 08:27 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,602
|
Quote:
My Hodgdon H335 says Made in USA. So what is the story about Varget in OZ? Is it the standard 308 powder?
__________________
............ |
|
May 8, 2011, 08:30 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2008
Posts: 949
|
There is only one Varget and it is made by ADI for Hodgdon. If you want load data directly from ADI:
http://www.adi-powders.com.au/handloaders-guide/ ADI makes and sells Varget under their own name as A2208. ADI also makes several other powders for Hodgdon like Clays, H4198, H4895, H4350,etc- 14 in all of the Hodgdon powders are made by ADI. |
May 8, 2011, 09:41 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
I question if AR2208 (didn't see an A2208 powder listed) is the same as Varget sold by Hodgdon:
Quote:
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition." - James Madison
|
|
May 8, 2011, 10:01 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,602
|
Quote:
They both say 45.0 g C at 2690 fps. So then, clearly, it is six one-way, and a half-dozen the other!
__________________
............ |
|
May 8, 2011, 10:10 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Quote:
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
|
May 8, 2011, 10:11 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: July 18, 2009
Location: Searcy Co. Arkansas
Posts: 24
|
H-Varget or Varget
Thanks to all, and to Loader 9, for the link. Also, the caution about using the US vs AU load data. It seems the the AU loads begin at 47 grain not 49 I read somewhere. I backed off 10% and first load was around 44 grains. My load data is outside. That figure (44 grains). Since I'm loading just to have a working 1903, I'll stay with 150 Hornady and 49 to 50 grains of Varget.
This rifle is a reminded of the one my Gran dad let me drag around in the early 1950's. It brings back a lot of great memories. Too bad we can't go back to those time, even if just for a little while. Bob R |
May 8, 2011, 10:11 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,602
|
Quote:
__________________
............ |
|
May 8, 2011, 11:28 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: July 18, 2009
Location: Searcy Co. Arkansas
Posts: 24
|
H-Varget Varget
Scorch,
It was this concern that was the cause of my original post. First shot out of the barrel was 44grains of Varget behind a Hornady 150 grain. The receiver had and now has been fired, who knows how many times. xSome caution is to be exercised, thus I have made it a rule with this rifle that NO heavy charges will be loaded/shot from this piece. I have no intent of firing anything other than original military loads. 147 - 150 grain bullets, with a powder charge not to exceed 51 grains. Not every receiver from 800,000 down was over fired and thus brittle. This one may be and I bear this in mind. I suppose that discussions about the manufacturing of the Rock Island 1903 have gone on ad infinitum, but I am most interested if someone has links or information concerning this, particularly how many cracked receivers were located. Certainly I have never heard of a total recall of the 800,000 that were suspected of being damaged in the heat treating process. Thank you for giving me and everyone else with an interest in this old line of firearms a heads up. Bob R. |
May 9, 2011, 10:19 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 789
|
solvability,
Hodgdon does make one thing: a lot of money |
May 11, 2011, 10:36 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
I am not a fan of these early receivers and have commented on them in a number of threads. The blow up pictures are always interesting.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...gle+heat+treat http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...gle+heat+treat http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...gle+heat+treat All of these early, almost "pre history" rifles, whether they be US or European are made of plain carbon steels made under primitive process controls. Modern actions are much safer just due to the better metals. The Springfield action has almost no shooter protection features, the 98 Mauser a lot, and people have been hurt when case heads blow in 03's. If you look at the picture of the one that frag'd when the case head blew, I don't think anyone wants to be behind one when that happens. If you accept the risk, and don't complain if you end up missing an eyeball, then only load mid level to light loads, using the best brass. Period loads pushed a 150 gr bullet at 2700 fps, the 174 grain bullet went 2650 fps. These loads are closer to 40K psia than 50 K psia. These are not magnum loads by today's standards. Still, these old receivers have been known to break without warning. Things from that era are not predictable. Always wear your shooting glasses. Just in case.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
|
|