The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

View Poll Results: Do you Zero for 100 or 200 yards?
I zero at 100yds. 46 35.66%
I zero at 200yds. 80 62.02%
I grin down all the animals I take, just like Davy. 3 2.33%
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 23, 2010, 06:58 AM   #1
Morgoroth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2010
Posts: 198
100 or 200 Zero?

I have a Winchester Model 70 chambered for .270 and I am trying to decide whether to Zero it at 100 or 200 yards. I am leaning towards 200 because I think it will be easier for me to be effective at 300yd (probably max range for where I will be hunting.)

But I thought I would post something here to see what others thought about it.

Also, how will being an extra 15ft in the air in a tree stand effect things?
Morgoroth is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 07:47 AM   #2
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
If you are hunting where a 200 + yard shot is an option, I'd zero at 200 yards. If you are hunting where you really aren't likely to take a shot that long, I'd zero in at 100 or 150. 300 yards is a hell of a long shot to take even zeroed at 200 yards.

I hunt mostly woods but do venture out west for pronghorn and zero all of my rifles at 150. My longest shot out west has been right about 200 to 225 yards. I'd guess my average distance has been between 150 and 175. During whitetail season at home, my average shot is usually right between 40 and 50 yards.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 07:49 AM   #3
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,717
It would be best to zero it for 200 yards - a flat shooting round like a .270 should be zeroed for a decent distance, especially if you have a 300 yard shot as you mentioned.

A 15 tall tree stand won't make much of a difference for your point of impact at longer ranges.
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 07:56 AM   #4
TheNatureBoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Posts: 1,204
100 yards for me.
TheNatureBoy is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 08:03 AM   #5
skydiver3346
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,222
Zeroing in a .270

Well, I hunt with a .270 and for me, the 100 yard zero is perfect. Being that the .270 is such a flat shooting hunting round, I can easily hit 200 yard deer size targets without even adjusting for the extra hundred yards. I think that even if I were to attempt a 300 yard shot (with 100 yd. zero) I would just hold the crosshair on the top of deer's back (shoulder area) and would still hit a vital area of the animal. At least that is my experience with my .270 rifle. I like the 100 yard zero, in case of much closer shots as well. Make sure you have a good rest and the 100 yard zero will be effective for all but the very longest shots (most of the time).
skydiver3346 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 08:07 AM   #6
reloader28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2009
Location: nw wyoming
Posts: 1,061
I voted for 100. But now that I think about it, I should have said really 200.

I sight in at 100 cause its easier to hold it steady, but I
set the crosshairs for 2" - 2 1/2" high

Last edited by reloader28; June 23, 2010 at 09:54 PM.
reloader28 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 08:50 AM   #7
troy_mclure
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: gulf of mexico
Posts: 2,716
.204 ruger, 7mm mag, are 200yd zero.
.45/70, .30-06, are 100yd zero.
.22rf, .40s&w(cx4),.50 in-line muzzle loader, 12 ga slug guns, are 50yd zero.
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."
troy_mclure is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 09:57 AM   #8
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
100 yds is WAY too short for a .270. If you have a normal scope mounting height (1.75") and you assume a 2" + - margin for a point-blank zero, then using a 130grn bullet with a B/C of 0.336 leaving the barrel at 3060fps with a 215yd zero the bullet will be never more than 2" high (at 119yds) and 2" low at 251 yds.

That should cover the vast majority of distance you would be hunting without needing to account for hold over/under.
Doyle is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 10:00 AM   #9
doofus47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
.30-06 at 200. With 165 grain bullets it leaves me about 2" high at 100.
In the woods, I seldom can see further than 200 yards most of the time.

It's like setting the old Kodak cameras to the "infinity" setting....
:-)
doofus47 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 10:02 AM   #10
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,681
As Doyle mentions MPBR is a more efficient way of determining a zero. I prefer a +/- 3" instead of 2" for a medium to large game set up such as a 270. That stretches you out close to 300 yards with a typical load in a typical rifle.

http://www.chuckhawks.com/rifle_trajectory_table.htm
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 10:05 AM   #11
Morgoroth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2010
Posts: 198
Quote:
.30-06 at 200. With 165 grain bullets it leaves me about 2" high at 100.
In the woods, I seldom can see further than 200 yards most of the time.
Were would it put you at 300yrds?

I am not sure where I will be hunting since I want to find some new places and a friend of a friend is going to take me out to some of his sites as well.

And I want to be effective out to 300 yrds, which is not unrealistic for a .270(from what I'm told.) Some of the places might be that far even though I am in middle NC.

So I am leaning toward a Zero at 200yrds.

Edit-After reading about the MPBR thing. I am considering that option strongly.

Last edited by Morgoroth; June 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM.
Morgoroth is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 10:12 AM   #12
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
I've always zeroed for 200 yards. I started out that way because "My daddy told me to." However, the logic soon became apparent: With that zero, 90% of the time you don't have to think. Just point-and-pull.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 01:01 PM   #13
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Morgoroth, you need to go to Remington's web site and download their Remshoot program. That's how I came up with the figures I gave you. You choose the caliber and bullet, set the shooting distance and zero distance, and the software calculates the hold over/under. It is geared for Remington branded ammo but other brands would only be off by fractions of an inch.
Doyle is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 01:09 PM   #14
rshanneck2002
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2008
Posts: 194
I will second that, a very useful FREE program that demonstrates the basic very,very simply.
rshanneck2002 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 01:43 PM   #15
Morgoroth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2010
Posts: 198
Thanks! I'll have to check that out when I get home.
Morgoroth is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 01:51 PM   #16
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
I zero in at 100, because my old eyes have trouble seeing the bullseye at 200 through the spotting scope. I DO, however, zero that 100 yard group to be 3" high at 100, so when I move the same target to 200 it is about 1' high and at 300 it then prints on the paper less than 2" low. In my 7 mag this gives me a dead-on hold to almost 400 yards.
oneounceload is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 02:06 PM   #17
L_Killkenny
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
Couldn't vote. 200 is way better than 100 for most centerfire rifles but I always sight my guns in for "maximum point blank range". Sighting in for 100 is like driving a corvette at 55 mph around a race track.

LK
L_Killkenny is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 02:15 PM   #18
Dannyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 627
Hi,
As a rule I zero my 30-06 at 200 METERS. (Where I live we use the metric system, it equals 219 Yards)

However, when I go hunting in a place that requires shots to 350M as a norm, I zero at 250 Meters. that gives me 5" drop at 350 and 4" high at 100M (I know my velocities and tables very well, I consider it essential).

However, since this particular area is flat open grasslands, the chances of getting closer are virtually nil, so longish shots are required (I am not saying long because I'll get jumped by someone who always shoots at 700 yards etc...) SInce I go there once a year, I have made it a habit to change the zero of my rifle in this manner when I arrive there.

Oh, I forgot to mention that I only use reloads, so I get to decide how flat my trajectory will be.

Brgds,

Danny

Last edited by Dannyl; June 23, 2010 at 11:19 PM.
Dannyl is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 09:24 PM   #19
hardluk1
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 600
Seems you will spend time rideing out to the targets ,right. Then sighting in at 100 yards fist and try for around 2 1/2" high at 100 then shoot 200 and 300 yard groups to see how it groups and placement. Adjust as needed. You may find that your rifle is not a bullseye rifle at 200 or 300 but will shoot to ,say 2" at 200 and 4" at 300 that fine for deer just right good notes. A try differnt ammo brands and wieghts. Some rifle can be paticular about ammo.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 11:00 PM   #20
cje1980
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,412
I zero all my rifles 2" high at 100 yards. With a 270 that is point and shoot out to 250 yards and about 6" low at 300 yards. WAY more useful than a standard 100 yard zero. Zeroing a 270 to hit dead on at 100 yards is the same as using a 30-30 zeroed 3" high at 100 yards. If you are going to shoot a flat shooting cartridge make it count. I've never understood why people sight their rifles dead on at 100 yards.
cje1980 is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 11:13 PM   #21
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
I use a 200yd zero. That pretty much covers 300yds and in.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 11:57 PM   #22
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,426
3"-3.5" high at 100 yards.

With my .270 Win, it gives me an MPBR of 270-300 yards. (Depends on the load.) It works out to about a 275 yard zero for the 300 yard MPBR.

With my .30-06, it should give me an MPBR of about 300 yards with 165-168gr boat tail spitzers. This works out to about a 250 yard zero.


But I don't need to shoot. After I spend few days in the same cloths, they die from the noxious fumes.


*Maximum Point-Blank Range. (Sea level, 60 degrees F. At normal Antelope hunt temperatures of 85-95 degrees and an altitude of 5,600-6,800' a.s.l., the MPBR increases up to 20 yards. At deer hunting temperatures of 30-45 degrees and an altitude of 8,000-10,500' a.s.l., the MPBR doesn't decrease too much.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old June 24, 2010, 12:23 AM   #23
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
I zero for MPBR with a 3" radius, then hold over if necessary. That puts me 3" high at 100, dead on at about 250 yds, in the meat to 300 or so. Works pretty well.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old June 24, 2010, 12:58 AM   #24
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
I answered with out reading your post. I ASSUMED you were talking about where I zero. Since I use a slug gun as it is pretty much all that is legal, I zero at 100. With a 270 I would certainly be zeroing farther out than that.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old June 24, 2010, 02:27 AM   #25
.300 Weatherby Mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,777
With a .270 with the 130 grain pill its a 200 yard zero for me...
.300 Weatherby Mag is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06875 seconds with 9 queries