|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13, 2019, 10:53 AM | #1 |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Revisiting Self Defense "Insurance"
A recent thread entitled "Carry Insurance" began with the assertion that a use of force incident will lead to great expenses. Some respondents took issue with that, citing the usual "clean shoot" idea and the possibility of immunity from prosecution.
But unless the person involved ignores good advice and is incredibly lucky, the only question is about the amount. If you are involved in an incident involving the use of force, the threat of force, or the exposure of a firearm or other weapon, you will be well advised to (1) be the first to report, and (2) obtain and engage competent legal representation immediately. That will cost money, up front. Will you need "insurance"? That depends entirely upon how much cash you can access. That means access immediately--attorneys do not work on the installment plan. How much? Well, as a benchmark, it you have done something with a firearm or other weapon, perhaps presenting it but not necessarily so, and you are innocent, getting to a pretrial hearing can set you back around $50,000. That's right, $50,000, cash. That number comes from people who know what they are doing. That's just for getting to a pre-trial hearing. It may stop there, or it may not. Should you want to request an immunity hearing, the cost will be much higher, even if there is no trial. Don't forget the cost of a full blown trial or two, and maybe an appeal. You do not want to be impoverished after your first trial, and be unable to mount an effective defense in a second. The stakes are far too high And that's for a clean incident with no shots fired, where the charge would be limited to aggravated assault. Attorney Andrew Branca says that that is the most common kind of case on which he is consulted. If someone is killed, the multiplier can be very large indeed. Most, and really all, of the people I know would be a whole lot better off with a plan that provides monetary assistance. They are not insurance per se, in a strict sense. They are contracts that may provide money for your defense, depending upon the terms. They do not cover other liabilities. The plans are not all the same. In choosing one, consider the following:
There's more, but that's enough to chew on for now. The best way I know to evaluate your alternatives is to take the Law of Self Defense Course on self defense insurance. I just did. I took at least a couple of hours on line. It was worth it. They compare several leading plans, and provide to a link to a tabular comparison. How can you tell other your attorney is equipped to serve you all in a self defense case? Few attorneys are. Take the LoSD Level One Course on Self Defense. That should help you know how to go about the interview. I was able to reject a couple of well-regarded criminal defense attorneys long before having taken this course. Oh, and one other thing. When you are allowed that one phone call, do not call your attorney. The likelihood that he or she will be available when you call is not very high. Instead, call someone whom you know you can reach, and let them keep calling until they make contact. I learned that from Massad Ayoob years ago. |
September 13, 2019, 11:49 AM | #2 | |||||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
And if we do carry, we may need it. Quote:
Quote:
It could amount to more, but remember, we're talking only about the lawful presentation of a weapon and the issuance of a warning bu the defender. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
September 13, 2019, 12:16 PM | #3 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,477
|
Quote:
https://www.concealedcarry.com/self-...rams-compared/
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
November 11, 2019, 09:00 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2010
Posts: 227
|
Even though this thread is aging somewhat, I feel I should post this.
Nice link, but that table is incorrect with regard to CCW Safe. Their programs start at $199. $499 is their absolute, top-tier coverage that pays for things like wrongful death lawsuit awards. Also, their bail/bond coverage goes up to $1,000,000, not $100,000. Another plus for CCW Safe is that they cover any liability for damage or injury from your bullets that pass through or miss the target. I don't know if others do this. Another factor that this table doesn't reflect is the experience and knowledge of the company's attorneys. For example, go to CCW Safe's web site (www.ccwsafe.com) and read the links in the "About" menu. Their blog page contains many extremely helpful articles and advice, as well. These provide hours of fascinating reading; it's amazing how sometimes a single act or a single comment can make the difference between going home and getting 99 years. Last edited by Ruark; November 11, 2019 at 09:06 AM. |
November 11, 2019, 09:46 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
|
I'll ask the question, cuz I have talked to a local LEO friend of mine. Middle of night, guy breaks my glass back door and comes in. I grab handgun, go upstairs and am approached by guy who has a big knife. I shoot him dead, I call 911...you're saying I will be arrested and charged? My LEO friend says no. I will surrender my gun, I will go 'downtown' to write statement but not be arrested or charged with any criminal offense. Colorado..am I wrong?
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer "Tools not Trophies” |
November 11, 2019, 11:41 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
I haven't a clue if your right or wrong, I'd guess your right. But weather right or wrong, your alive! Hard to arrest a dead guy!
|
November 11, 2019, 12:28 PM | #7 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,477
|
Quote:
The reality is that, based on exactly the scenario you described -- with no complicating factors that might be observed by a homicide investigating team -- you probably would not be arrested. But you might be. In that event, more than likely you would not be convicted at trial, but you would still have to pay to defend yourself in court. As has been mentioned, we can't assume that responding police officers will view what we consider a "good shoot" in the same light. There's an old saying: "You may beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride."
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
November 11, 2019, 01:47 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Quote:
There are no absolutes. The Travis County (Austin) Texas announced he was going to pursue every self defense shooting in court.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
|
November 11, 2019, 04:27 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2010
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11, 2019, 06:11 PM | #10 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer "Tools not Trophies” |
||
November 11, 2019, 08:30 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
|
Believe it or not, Austin (not all of Travis county) is the most Liberal area of the state. The folks over yonder want to be just like San Francisco in every way possible.
If I lived in Austin, I would want all the insurance that I could afford. |
November 16, 2019, 11:59 AM | #12 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
In Texas, whether it is in Austin or Amarillo, if you shoot someone, it is 99% going to be presented to the grand jury.* You may not be arrested or charged initially; but it will go to the grand jury. Last time I looked, the price to have competent representation (i.e. someone who knows what they are doing if it goes past the grand jury phase) just to hold your hand through the grand jury process only is around $8,000.
Now, you don’t have to hire a lawyer for that and many people do not. However, when facing a chance of being indicted for murder, many people don’t feel very comfortable about stepping into the lion’s cage on their own. *Historically, this has been 100% but since there isn’t an actual law requiring prosecutors to do it, it is technically possible a DA might choose not to present. |
November 16, 2019, 12:06 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
Best advice I ever got about shooting someone came from a NYC cop. He told me they know most of us truck driver's have a gun. If we have to shoot someone just leave them lay, don't call them. They will find them and if we call in there's just to much paper work. That has always sounded like good advice to me!
|
November 16, 2019, 03:08 PM | #14 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
That’s not only bad advice. It is a good way to turn a legitimate self-defense shoot into a manslaughter conviction.
|
November 16, 2019, 03:13 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
|
Instead of speculating about how it will cost $50,000 or $8000, why not identify the actual lawyer you would be most likely to use and discuss this with them?
My experience with lawyers is that it can be extremely hard to find one willing to do $50,000 worth of work. You really have to have quite a case to generate that much work, and while that in itself is not inconceivable, finding a lawyer willing to do it is no simple task. The reality is that not many attorneys can make that kind of money handling those kinds of cases. How often does it happen that a law-abiding citizen is involved in a shooting? A lot less often than DUI, injury, divorce, estate planning, trusts and corporate law. Now how often does the law-abiding citizen involved in a shooting actually have $50,000 cash or $500,000 for their legal defense? Yeah, I don't see many lawyers coming out of law school planning their careers around a high-frequency of that scenario. If you find a steady source for these super criminal defense lawyers at any price who will actually answer a phone call from me, let me know. |
November 16, 2019, 05:52 PM | #16 | |||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
November 16, 2019, 09:04 PM | #17 | |||||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
People tend to equate flight with guilt. Post incident conduct is evidence and can be argued as evidence of guilt. For example see:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|||||
November 16, 2019, 09:20 PM | #18 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
November 16, 2019, 10:18 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
On the advice of a good friend, I applied for USCCA? I think that's its name, I am not near my wallet at this time. Call the number in my Cell phone, a Criminal Lawyer will be dispatched! They do not say do not talk to Police but lean towards keeping it brief.
I had a head-on collision, totally the fault of the other driver, the paramedics took my vitals, disengaged me from the Police Officer "Bye" off to the Hospital. He said, "I just want more info?" They buttoned me onto a stretcher, and off to Dr Phillips. |
November 17, 2019, 07:28 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
|
Quote:
http://ianinglis.com/article-texas-c...doctrine.shtml
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer "Tools not Trophies” |
|
November 17, 2019, 09:48 AM | #21 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
This, from the link:....
...is a rether sloppy way of summarizing the law. Do not overlook fact that the defender must produce evidence showing a basis for that belief, and that said belisf must be considered reasonable (by others). This.... "Texas' castle doctrine, or castle law, protects you from legal troubles if you are ever placed in a situation where you have to use force or deadly force to protect yourself against an intruder who poses a threat. ..."...is only true if you define "protects you from legal troubles" as not requring you to go through a complete trial if you are aa able to convince the court in an immunity hearing that a preponderance of the evidence supports your case. Getting through that immunity hearing will cost a lot of money This.... "And the law is going to assume you had the right to do so."...is not true at all. |
|
November 17, 2019, 11:17 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
Never said it was right, said it was good advice and came from a NYC cop.
|
November 17, 2019, 11:23 AM | #23 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
November 19, 2019, 02:14 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
|
If you can produce a written statement of Andrew Branca's that he is willing to work for you, then you've got me. I know better than to pin my hopes on someone like Andrew. It would be foolish to even consider his estimate of something about which he knows nothing. He certainly knows absolutely nothing about you or me. He can pull any number he wants out of thin air and he probably puts those kind of numbers on the bills he send to fools, but what difference does it make if he won't do anything for you? Find someone who is actually willing to help you, to do anything for you at all, and then discuss price with them, rather than some dude on Youtube that won't give you the time of day.
|
November 19, 2019, 07:59 AM | #25 | ||||||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
He will not represent you (he may not be licensed to practice law in your particular state) but he will provide valuable advice to your principal attorney. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And he knows what those attorneys have had to charge, at every step along the way, Quote:
Quote:
That's why your attorney will requre the expertise of people who do. That costs money. And so do the expert witnesses and iinvestigators that your attorney will need. |
||||||
|
|