|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 5, 2018, 01:45 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Visa waivers
Quote:
Although it's true that a non-immigrant who qualifies for a visa waiver is allowed to possess firearms under federal law, the issue at street level is that a visa waiver, by definition, leaves no paper trail. This makes it very difficult for an FFL or an ordinary non-licensee to differentiate between a foreigner lawfully in the U.S. under a visa waiver program, and one in the country illegally. Additionally, it's my understanding that visa waiver eligibility may be revoked suddenly and without warning if it's discovered that the foreigner has been convicted of certain crimes in their home country or a third country, and not all of these crimes are necessarily felonies under U.S. law (e.g. I've read that repeat DUI's qualify in some cases). IOW someone from a generally waiver-friendly country such as Canada is NOT automatically A-OK, even if they lawfully entered under a waiver. A valid hunting license provides affirmative proof that a foreigner may legally possess firearms. Presumably for this reason, I've observed that multiple local FFLs demand to see one, and are unwilling to go down the visa waiver rabbit trail. This may not be true of the Vegas machine-gun ranges, but that's their decision. Although I'm not an attorney, I have enough personal knowledge and experience with the pitfalls of immigration law to sympathize with an FFL's desire to play it safe.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
April 6, 2018, 05:45 PM | #27 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
<snip> Last edited by Frank Ettin; April 6, 2018 at 05:55 PM. Reason: delete off topic comment |
|
April 6, 2018, 06:08 PM | #28 | |||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
If there is a reason the person can not lawfully possess a firearm or ammunition other than 18 USC 922(g)(5)(B), usch reason would be independent of his being a foreigner (except if he were in this country illegally).
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|||
June 1, 2018, 10:44 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: January 17, 2017
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 23
|
Hands on experience
Hello all.
First of all, this shouldn't been taken as an advocate advice or something similar. I'm not a lawyer and here in the US on a non immigrant E2 Visa since 2014. My Visa is valid for 5 years. I'm planning on staying here and spend the rest of my life here and try to become an US Citizen, which is another story. In this case I put in for the Green card lottery, and will probably apply for citizenship when I have my second Visa approved (long shot ) - This might play into it as well I purchased my first pistol here under the exception for have a hunting license (I don't hunt, the only use of my guns are for annoying steel and paper ) Being in the system based on this exemption I applied for a CCDW, which got approved as well. (BTW my KY permit is recognized in 38 states) Based on the local law, by using the exemption to use my CCDW for verification, I'm able to purchase a firearm at any FFL in the state I live in. Just my 2 cents. It may apply in my case but won't work for others. |
June 3, 2018, 09:34 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
What about that rent-a-range in Las Vegas that is famous for renting full-auto weapons to tourists? Can't remember the name. Do they sell TP-grade-hunting licenses?
interesting.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
June 5, 2018, 08:51 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
This theory seems questionable to me, but it's apparent that the ATF is not actively trying to prosecute violators, so it remains a legal grey area. My hunch is that the Vegas ranges have a high-powered legal team on speed-dial and are willing to take the risk because it underpins their lucrative business model.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
June 5, 2018, 11:09 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Another scenario - I have friends from England who also own a home here in the US and come twice a year for 3 months at a time. I BELIEVE they have a Visa to enter and they bring a few shotguns with them each time. If what I am understanding from the above posts, are they legally allowed to buy ammunition for those shotguns, or is it a case of don't ask don't tell?
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
June 5, 2018, 01:09 PM | #33 | |||||||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
If they are present in the United States legally without a visa under the terms of the Visa Waiver Program (see post 25), according to the ATF they may possess guns and/or ammunition. Quote:
Quote:
Possession means: And as to the applicability of the common meaning of "possession" see Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (United States Supreme Court, 1979), at 42: So a person shooting your gun at the range has dominion and control of the gun, and therefore possession of the gun, even if you're supervising. The better explanation is prosecutorial discretion. Apparently the Department of Justice doesn't see any reason to bother with those ranges allowing foreign tourists to shoot. But that didn't stop the U. S. Attorney in California from prosecuting some Saudi Arabians who rented guns at a range in San Diego. See posts 9 and 20. The situation is somewhat similar to federal policy on prosecuting federal marijuana offenses in State which have legalized medical and/or recreational use. In general the Department of Justice doesn't seem bother garden variety sale/use in conformity with state law. That doesn't mean that a marijuana seller or user (or a marijuana user in possession of a gun) won't be prosecuted if the local U. S. Attorney decides circumstances warrant prosecution or prosecution would further federal interests. Here's current federal policy on prosecution of marijuana offenses.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|||||||
June 5, 2018, 01:12 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Despite our country's freewheeling reputation regarding firearms, CBP does NOT treat the importation of firearms casually.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
June 21, 2018, 11:51 AM | #35 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
The ground has been covered.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
|