![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,028
|
Quote:
Last edited by higgite; August 17, 2020 at 07:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,486
|
and in the past 44 years no one has come up with a unique term for that point on the ogive, which probably says something about how important it is...
I suppose Rifling Contact Point would do as a general term. The thing about loading for handguns vs rifles is that while some things apply straight across the board, other things don't. Also even in rifles some things that are useful in some rifles for some purposes simply aren't for others. As a friend of mine frequently says, when the subject of seating bullets 0.0xx" off the lands comes up, .. "how does this help me shooting a .300 Savage Model 99 put down an elk?? The point is, while seating a certain distance off the lands may result in the most accurate load, it isn't a practical or sometimes even a possible thing in some guns, IF you plan to use them as repeaters. Additionally, his rifle is already more than minute of elk accurate with both factory and regular handloads, so why bother?? When you shift over to handguns things get more complicated in some ways and simpler in others. There are 3 types of handguns, revolvers, semi autos, and "others". There are physical limits as to how close to the lands you can get in a revolver. The closest you can possibly get is the bullet tip even with the front face of the cylinder (and be sure it won't move forward!!) Semi autos are a mixed bag, running from pocket guns up through duty/service class guns, and all the way to magnums. Since the chamber and barrel are one, in theory you could "chase the lands' the way a target shooter can. However, there are several factors that can get in the way. AND there are many factors that work against rifle level accuracy, no matter where the bullet is seated relative to the rifling. The last class of handguns I called "other" and there are some of those that are essentially short barrel stockless rifles, single shots of bolt action or break action design where you can load bullets to 0.xxx off the lands if you wish. An XP 100 or a T/C Contender are a couple examples of that. But now, turn and take a look at semiautos again. From a pocket .380 to a GLock to a Desert Eagle, you find a huge amount of variations. many of them limiting the ability to load bullet long enough to reach the lands. AND there is also the opposite where guns have "short" throats and some bullets cannot be loaded to max length and must be shorter to keep them out of the lands. Its very much a gun & bullet specific thing.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,476
|
This is a question for Uncle Nick concerning a comment you made in post #20 about replacing the Hornady bullet comparator with the Sinclair. Does this mean the Sinclair unit will fit in the Hornady body?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,028
|
I'm not Unclenick, nor do I play him on TV
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,476
|
Thanks. I’m going to need a couple of those.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 13, 2020
Posts: 85
|
if it keeps you up at night,,, get a nice revolver. and get bullets with a crimp groove. youll be happier.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|