The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 2, 2010, 09:35 PM   #26
shooter1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 265
There is definitely a liability issue if someone like a child gets their hands on your gun and shoots himself after you have removed the lock, as it is your responsibility to keep your gun out of the hands of children. On the other hand you have the same liability if that child got their hands on your gun with a lock and you left it unlocked, and the child shoots himself, at least in Texas that is the law. In Texas you are liable anytime a child gets his hands on your gun period. Shooting someone in self defense has absolutely no bearing what so ever as to the status of your internal lock. We are not talking about safeties, we are discussing locks.

Feel free to challenge the above statement, but please include the court case number as reference so we can all look it up.
shooter1911 is offline  
Old May 3, 2010, 07:37 AM   #27
Triggernosis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Posts: 119
As far as I'm concerned, if a child gets hold of your gun and shoots himself, you're liable and phucked regardless of whether you disabled the lock or not. I know I am here in NC, at least.
Triggernosis is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03025 seconds with 7 queries