Nano-oil By StClaire! - Page 2

NanoLube · February 24, 2010, 02:00 PM

Picatinny Arsenal has been testing the Real NanoLube™ (www.diamondlube.com) for some time now - and they have "not" encountered ANY short term gains or common lubrication problems, and once approved, NanoLube™ will be the Governments replacement CLP that provides Diamond Hard Coatings.

I would appreciate any comments by email - to keep the board clean.

As for NanoLube™ NOT working as advertised - the NASCAR race car that we treated (and are sponsoring) showed NO improvement UNTIL the nanomaterial worked into the friction surfaces. After 1.5 hours of wear-in time, the dynomometer proved that the car performance had measurably improved. Due to agreement, I cannot tell you how much - but the results will be public when he tops tracks records in NASCAR.

We are also treating and sponsoring a 1/4 mile drag racer that currently runs 7.65 sec at 185 MPH at 1500HP.

Two Airlines are testing my products as well, and it is not because the product is a scam.

I don't like selling little bottles anymore, so please do not take this as self promotion of my patented and patent pending inventions, just keep an eye out for a new rising NASCAR winner. If you want NanoLube™, buy it from "Berland's House of Tools" in Illinois or on ebay.

The Wheaton Police Department armorer recently treated all of armory weapons - because an officer used a 3ml bottle of NanoLube™ on his personal weapons for two years, and was stunned at how jam free and easy his guns were to clean after shooting.

Three or more articles are being written by major Gun Magazines about the original NanoLube™ by www.diamondlube.com, and StClaire is due back in court for fraud, theft of intellectual property, etc. on 3/9/10 - and that sums up what I have to say.

Quote: (I can assure you without a doubt I am in no way connected with the company (StClaire).) Anyone buy that?

Brian Pfleuger · February 24, 2010, 02:16 PM

Hey, at least Mr. NanoLube is honest about his affiliations! That's a start.

On the topic of the Nascar engine.... I'd like to know how many hours that engine had on it BEFORE the Nanolube was applied. EVERY engine improves it's output as the rings seat and bearings smooth out. In other words, if it was a brand new engine then output would improve over time REGARDLESS of the oil.... except in the case of the oil actually be so good as to prevent the rings sealing. Actually, that would be more impressive of your product..... if it was so good that it prevented ring seating.

NanoLube · February 24, 2010, 03:06 PM

Pete (?)
The engines are broke in and dyno'ed before delivery, ensuring acurate HP and ring seating. The new engine was installed in the car, run and then and dyno'ed prior to adding our enhanced HyperDiamond® product available only to NASCAR teams. The reports were stable prior to adding HyperDiamond® and within 45 minutes after adding it – however after 45 minutes, power started rising. Highly machined and polished surfaces require additional time for the friction reducing effects to be seen, but power always increases as our product diamond coats the friction surfaces.

On the ring seating question, a local engine builder used NanoLube™ on one set (because it was extremely tight) of rings on an 8 cylinder engine. 7 sets of ring seated normally and the treated set (which was instantly slippery) refused to seat. He then realized that after the rings seat and the engine is treated, wear has a hard time even starting.

Quick trademark explanation,
NanoLube™ - sporting goods and tool markets
Quicken® Precision, Automotive and Industrial markets
Quicken® Military Specification “NEW enhanced formula”
HyperDiamond® currently available “only” to NASCAR and the Military

All product rely on the same patented and patent pending, licensed novel NanoDiamond – however our NASCAR formula HyperDiamond® has many, many more times the nano-material than is currently available in either NanoLube™ or Quicken®, however these products are all superior to normal lubricants. I don't actually have lubricants - because my products are treatments that provide Diamond Hard Coatings.

Nano-Oil.com · February 24, 2010, 06:53 PM

Christopher Arnold wrote:
"All product rely on the same patented and patent pending, licensed novel NanoDiamond"

Not patented nor applied for by Christopher Arnold for sure. Do not bother asking him for his "nanolube" patent numbers or application numbers, he does not have any.
He has claim such since 2007

Only one patent granted in 2001 to him #6,271,614 which has nothing to do with Nano particle synthesis.

Arnold still has not paid StClaire for the court ordered settlement of April 2009
can be seen here: http://www.NanoLube.com/legal.html

Christian StClaire

**Bud Helms** · February 24, 2010, 07:05 PM

Alrightee then.

I think we won't provide a forum for this little disagreement.

Ca-losed!

February 24, 2010, 02:16 PM	#27
Brian Pfleuger Moderator Emeritus Join Date: June 25, 2008 Location: Austin, CO Posts: 19,694	Hey, at least Mr. NanoLube is honest about his affiliations! That's a start. On the topic of the Nascar engine.... I'd like to know how many hours that engine had on it BEFORE the Nanolube was applied. EVERY engine improves it's output as the rings seat and bearings smooth out. In other words, if it was a brand new engine then output would improve over time REGARDLESS of the oil.... except in the case of the oil actually be so good as to prevent the rings sealing. Actually, that would be more impressive of your product..... if it was so good that it prevented ring seating. __________________ https://ecommercearms.com I am the owner/operator! Ask me for custom prices! No sales tax outside CO!

February 24, 2010, 03:06 PM	#28
NanoLube Member Join Date: March 15, 2008 Posts: 53	Pete (?) The engines are broke in and dyno'ed before delivery, ensuring acurate HP and ring seating. The new engine was installed in the car, run and then and dyno'ed prior to adding our enhanced HyperDiamond® product available only to NASCAR teams. The reports were stable prior to adding HyperDiamond® and within 45 minutes after adding it – however after 45 minutes, power started rising. Highly machined and polished surfaces require additional time for the friction reducing effects to be seen, but power always increases as our product diamond coats the friction surfaces. On the ring seating question, a local engine builder used NanoLube™ on one set (because it was extremely tight) of rings on an 8 cylinder engine. 7 sets of ring seated normally and the treated set (which was instantly slippery) refused to seat. He then realized that after the rings seat and the engine is treated, wear has a hard time even starting. Quick trademark explanation, NanoLube™ - sporting goods and tool markets Quicken® Precision, Automotive and Industrial markets Quicken® Military Specification “NEW enhanced formula” HyperDiamond® currently available “only” to NASCAR and the Military All product rely on the same patented and patent pending, licensed novel NanoDiamond – however our NASCAR formula HyperDiamond® has many, many more times the nano-material than is currently available in either NanoLube™ or Quicken®, however these products are all superior to normal lubricants. I don't actually have lubricants - because my products are treatments that provide Diamond Hard Coatings. Last edited by NanoLube; February 24, 2010 at 03:11 PM. Reason: additional info

February 24, 2010, 02:00 PM	#26
NanoLube Member Join Date: March 15, 2008 Posts: 53	Picatinny Arsenal has been testing the Real NanoLube™ (www.diamondlube.com) for some time now - and they have "not" encountered ANY short term gains or common lubrication problems, and once approved, NanoLube™ will be the Governments replacement CLP that provides Diamond Hard Coatings. I would appreciate any comments by email - to keep the board clean. As for NanoLube™ NOT working as advertised - the NASCAR race car that we treated (and are sponsoring) showed NO improvement UNTIL the nanomaterial worked into the friction surfaces. After 1.5 hours of wear-in time, the dynomometer proved that the car performance had measurably improved. Due to agreement, I cannot tell you how much - but the results will be public when he tops tracks records in NASCAR. We are also treating and sponsoring a 1/4 mile drag racer that currently runs 7.65 sec at 185 MPH at 1500HP. Two Airlines are testing my products as well, and it is not because the product is a scam. I don't like selling little bottles anymore, so please do not take this as self promotion of my patented and patent pending inventions, just keep an eye out for a new rising NASCAR winner. If you want NanoLube™, buy it from "Berland's House of Tools" in Illinois or on ebay. The Wheaton Police Department armorer recently treated all of armory weapons - because an officer used a 3ml bottle of NanoLube™ on his personal weapons for two years, and was stunned at how jam free and easy his guns were to clean after shooting. Three or more articles are being written by major Gun Magazines about the original NanoLube™ by www.diamondlube.com, and StClaire is due back in court for fraud, theft of intellectual property, etc. on 3/9/10 - and that sums up what I have to say. Quote: (I can assure you without a doubt I am in no way connected with the company (StClaire).) Anyone buy that?

February 24, 2010, 06:53 PM	#29
Nano-Oil.com Member Join Date: February 24, 2010 Posts: 19	Christopher Arnold wrote: "All product rely on the same patented and patent pending, licensed novel NanoDiamond" Not patented nor applied for by Christopher Arnold for sure. Do not bother asking him for his "nanolube" patent numbers or application numbers, he does not have any. He has claim such since 2007 Only one patent granted in 2001 to him #6,271,614 which has nothing to do with Nano particle synthesis. Arnold still has not paid StClaire for the court ordered settlement of April 2009 can be seen here: http://www.NanoLube.com/legal.html Christian StClaire

February 24, 2010, 07:05 PM	#30
Bud Helms Senior Member Join Date: December 31, 1999 Location: Middle Georgia, USA Posts: 13,198	Alrightee then. I think we won't provide a forum for this little disagreement. Ca-losed!