![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 1999
Location: Northeastern PA
Posts: 760
|
And if you can't load a round that does not need to be crimped you are also doing something wrong.
__________________
Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2002
Location: SWNH
Posts: 1,332
|
Depends on the Bullet
I honestly think it depends on the bullet. Those stubby little 147gr Winchester FMJBTs in .30 caliber are awful, IMO. I HAVE to crimp those for ANY rifle to get them to stay seated. Cycling a couple of dummies through a 1903 bolt gun had the bullets spinning silly.
With something like a 168gr Matchking, I don't crimp, or if I do, very, very lightly, as suggested. The 168 has a fairly long bearing surface and a case with good neck tension will hold it tight. Insufficient neck tension worries me more than whether to crimp or not. FWIW, I seat my long range AR loads about .010" from the lands, uncrimped, and they extract just fine. My short line ammo has much more space to jump than that. I seat those long enough that .007" of jump would make them just barely able to clear the magazine, and I've ejected and reused these before too. Like I said, depends on the rifle and load. For an M-1, with stubby bullets, I'd do it. Quick and simple peace of mind. (And it really doesn't tkae long to crimp up a batch of rounds, IME.)
__________________
NRA Master, Highpower Rifle, Across-the-Course NRA Expert, Highpower Rifle, Mid-Range Prone |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|