The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 10, 2020, 08:53 PM   #1
BondoBob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2020
Posts: 163
Pistol rounds in rifle

I have a lead on a 1894 marlin lever gun chambered in 357. I'm wondering if there are separate load data to be used when firing these pistol rounds through a rifle. I imagine slower powder might make sense with the longer barrel. But then again part of the appeal of this rifle would be to use the same rounds for both revolvers and the rifle. It will be used for hog hunting, target and (hopefully not necessary) bug-out gun.
BondoBob is offline  
Old September 10, 2020, 09:53 PM   #2
NoSecondBest
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 2,736
Every loading I own or have looked at shows the same data for rifle and handgun. What you do get is more muzzle velocity with the longer rifle barrel.
NoSecondBest is offline  
Old September 11, 2020, 12:03 AM   #3
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,496
Base data is the same, what you can work up to in your gun is what you can work up to in your gun.

Fast powder or slow, ALL will gain speed from the carbine barrel. Slower powders gain proportionally more.

With certain loads the .357 carbine will give 500-600fps more than the usual handgun. This can result in some bullets being overdriven and giving much different than expected performance.

Especially the 125 JHPs.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old September 11, 2020, 04:34 AM   #4
joeanybody
Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2017
Posts: 61
Just a quick look in my Hornady 10th edition,which separates 357 mag into rifle and handgun, shows the same max charge using h110 and a 158gr xtp.
joeanybody is offline  
Old September 11, 2020, 10:23 AM   #5
Average Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,332
Same load, rifle or pistol. No difference.
Average Joe is offline  
Old September 12, 2020, 04:07 PM   #6
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,743
It the case of H110/296, you are filling the case space under the bullet with a maximum 158-grain load, so you can't easily load that powder any higher for the carbine, anyway, even if it is stronger and supports the case better (which it probably doesn't).
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old September 12, 2020, 06:15 PM   #7
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,620
Quote:
Same load, rifle or pistol. No difference.
Mmm, yes. Technically.

The Speer and Hornady manuals have separate sections for 357 (and 44) mag rifle. I haven't done a comprehensive scan, but it appears the only difference is that the rifle sections only show the slow propellants - they omit the intermediate and fast burning propellants. Which kinda makes sense. At any rate, the charge weights for the propellants shown in both sections seem to be the same (of the ones I checked). That's important to know.

I recently (a couple years ago - that's "recently" for me ) purchased a Henry 357 Mag rifle. I quickly learned I should have made this purchase about three decades ago - but that's another story. Anyway, with some playing around, having fun, experimenting, and chronographing, I quickly learned that I really only have an enduring desire to shoot full-throttle 158 grainers through it. Anything else has already become rare and just for the novelty of it.

The full-throttle loading of mention here would be with W296. Yes, the charge weight well exceeds the current Speer book max; but is under the Speer #10 book max - which was the "latest" Speer manual when I developed the load (1984). Been using the same recipe ever since and seems to show no signs of excessive pressure - in any gun I shoot them through (that'd be 3 different 686's, a Python, and the Henry). I developed this load when my only 357 Mag gun was a 686 w/ 8-3/8" bbl. Through that long bbl, it shoots pretty nice. I later purchased 4" and 3" bbl 686's, and this loading is just too . . "superfluous" for these shorter bbl magnums. Since my shooting style matured to rarely shooting the 8" bbl gun, I cut way back on loading the W296 ammo - until I got the Henry. Today, I consider my W296 loading to be "Henry ammo." And everything else is for the revolvers.

So yes, it's technically "same load, rifle or pistol, no difference." But in reality, most prefer to tailor their ammo to suit the bbl length of the gun. At least, that has become my approach.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 01:24 PM   #8
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Average Joe View Post
Same load, rifle or pistol. No difference.
This....you load for the caliber/cartridge, not the platform. The platforms are designed for the caliber/cartridge.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 03:40 PM   #9
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,743
Since the pressure rating is the same for rifle and pistol, the same loads will be used where the powders are the same. SAAMI does use a longer test barrel for 44 Magnum in carbine rifles, but they don't have that addition for .357 Magnum.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 04:07 PM   #10
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,496
Quote:
This....you load for the caliber/cartridge, not the platform. The platforms are designed for the caliber/cartridge.
That's ONE way to do it. Another way is to load for the caliber/cartridge, AND the "platform" (the gun).

A couple of examples of that are "Ruger Only" .45 Colt loads, and the three tier load levels used for the different strength levels of .45-70 rifles.

The "platforms" vary. Both by design features and strengths, and as individual units. You can load to a standard that works in multiple guns in the same caliber, and its not a bad idea, but doing that leaves you unable to take fullest advantage of some guns abilities.

Both approaches have their pros and cons.

And, I would point out that every load in the manual isn't suitable for every gun out there. I've shot loads listed in the manual, same load listed in both pistol and rifle sections, there were not suitable for all the guns I had. Shot a hot .357 load from a K frame, and N frame, a Desert Eagle, and a Marlin carbine. Fine is the big guns and the carbine, the K frame needed to have the empties driven out of the chambers. Was smart enough not to even try that load in a J frame gun.

If you have guns that cover a wide range of capabilities to feed, loading rounds that work is all of them is a good practice, ensuring you won't get the "wrong" ammo in the wrong gun. Lowest common denominator works.

Tailoring ammo to each specific guns strengths and weaknesses requires more work, and keeping ammo segregated for safety reasons, for some of its the way to go.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 05:45 PM   #11
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,514
As UN stated SAAMI specs are just that. Don't fall into the "the rifle will take a higher pressure load" trap. You'll eventually load the rifle load into the pistol and you will not like the results.
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 05:59 PM   #12
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,476
Contrary to what common sense tells you, one of the most accurate loads I’ve had at 50 yds was with Titegroup. It also shot great in my revolvers. I never checked it in a chrono but accuracy was great. I’ve never tried it beyond 50yds though.

Last edited by jetinteriorguy; September 13, 2020 at 08:52 PM.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old September 13, 2020, 07:00 PM   #13
gwpercle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 1,915
Although the loading manual may list the same powder charge and bullet the velocity from a 20" rifle barrel (1650 fps )will be greater than a 7.5" pistol barrel (1200 fps) with no other changes in your load .
And you may pick up greater velocity ... I only looked at one load with one powder and one bullet ... the rifle can make a ho-hum revolver load shine !
Gary
gwpercle is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05071 seconds with 9 queries