![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Posts: 7
|
High Tek
I was going to try some high tek bullets and I see that Missouri Bullet has bullets with and with out grooves. Do you need the grooves as they are not lubed?
Thanks Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,012
|
You do not need the grooves but the presence of them or the lack thereof will have an effect on your load.
I shoot ACME bullets which use the hitek and they are selling a mix of bullets with and without the lube groove. Just account for the difference and it shouldn't be an issue one way or the other. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2013
Posts: 40
|
What do you mean, account for the difference?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
The groove bullets are just older designs from wax lube bullets, no lube groove bullets are made from modern designs meant for hitek coating. I shoot 2 different coated 9mm bullets. One has grooves, one doesn't. I notice no difference in performance and load them exactly the same.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Posts: 7
|
Ok that's what I thought just wanted to make sure.
Thanks Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,012
|
Quote:
That is what you have to account for. You will likely need to adjust your charge weight, though the difference won't be huge. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
|
Differences in velocity between lube groove and no lube groove bullets was minor to non-existent in this article: https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/...-cast-bullets/
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
Quote:
I'm using 2 different 9mm 125 grain cone bullets, MBC with lube groove and bevel base and BBI no lube groove, square base. The MBC is .613" long, the BBI is .608", not enough to worry about. I also have some 9mm 125 grain SWCs, but can't use them. Due to a short leade in my 9mm barrel I have to seat them so deep in the case that it would not be safe to load them. The key is knowing how deep the base of your bullet is (seating depth) when transferring load data from one bullet to another. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
|
Why would it not be safe to load them? Can't you just reduce the powder charge so it would be safe?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
It probably could be done, but it would all be experimental data and probably very sensitive to minor variations in powder charge or bullet depth.
Risks outweighing rewards. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2018/...-need-to-know/ And you could contact the powder companies and ask for their advice. They're very helpful. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
Thanks, might look that up.
I only have a hundred SWCs, and the cones are doing what I want, so for now I'm going to experiment further with the cones. Right now I'm contemplating a small batch with the bullets seated out long enough to headspace on the bullet instead of the rim like they do with some target .45 auto loads. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|