The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 31, 2019, 07:30 PM   #1
steve_l
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Posts: 7
High Tek

I was going to try some high tek bullets and I see that Missouri Bullet has bullets with and with out grooves. Do you need the grooves as they are not lubed?
Thanks Steve
steve_l is offline  
Old March 31, 2019, 07:49 PM   #2
disseminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,012
You do not need the grooves but the presence of them or the lack thereof will have an effect on your load.

I shoot ACME bullets which use the hitek and they are selling a mix of bullets with and without the lube groove. Just account for the difference and it shouldn't be an issue one way or the other.
disseminator is offline  
Old April 1, 2019, 08:54 AM   #3
andyjr11
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2013
Posts: 40
What do you mean, account for the difference?
andyjr11 is offline  
Old April 1, 2019, 09:14 AM   #4
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
The groove bullets are just older designs from wax lube bullets, no lube groove bullets are made from modern designs meant for hitek coating. I shoot 2 different coated 9mm bullets. One has grooves, one doesn't. I notice no difference in performance and load them exactly the same.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old April 1, 2019, 04:32 PM   #5
steve_l
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Posts: 7
Ok that's what I thought just wanted to make sure.
Thanks Steve
steve_l is offline  
Old April 2, 2019, 07:30 PM   #6
disseminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
The groove bullets are just older designs from wax lube bullets, no lube groove bullets are made from modern designs meant for hitek coating. I shoot 2 different coated 9mm bullets. One has grooves, one doesn't. I notice no difference in performance and load them exactly the same.
The difference is that the bullets with no lube groove are shorter than the ones with a lube groove even though they are the same weight. The longer bullet protrudes deeper into the case than the ones without a groove do.

That is what you have to account for.

You will likely need to adjust your charge weight, though the difference won't be huge.
disseminator is offline  
Old April 2, 2019, 08:30 PM   #7
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
Differences in velocity between lube groove and no lube groove bullets was minor to non-existent in this article: https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/...-cast-bullets/
74A95 is offline  
Old April 3, 2019, 09:44 AM   #8
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
Quote:
The difference is that the bullets with no lube groove are shorter than the ones with a lube groove even though they are the same weight. The longer bullet protrudes deeper into the case than the ones without a groove do.

That is what you have to account for.
In theory that is correct, especially with the 9mm's tiny case. It wouldn't matter much in a 357, but seating bullets deeper in a 9mm case can raise pressure significantly.

I'm using 2 different 9mm 125 grain cone bullets, MBC with lube groove and bevel base and BBI no lube groove, square base. The MBC is .613" long, the BBI is .608", not enough to worry about.
I also have some 9mm 125 grain SWCs, but can't use them. Due to a short leade in my 9mm barrel I have to seat them so deep in the case that it would not be safe to load them.

The key is knowing how deep the base of your bullet is (seating depth) when transferring load data from one bullet to another.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old April 3, 2019, 11:36 AM   #9
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhead View Post
I also have some 9mm 125 grain SWCs, but can't use them. Due to a short leade in my 9mm barrel I have to seat them so deep in the case that it would not be safe to load them.
Why would it not be safe to load them? Can't you just reduce the powder charge so it would be safe?
74A95 is offline  
Old April 3, 2019, 12:32 PM   #10
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
It probably could be done, but it would all be experimental data and probably very sensitive to minor variations in powder charge or bullet depth.
Risks outweighing rewards.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old April 3, 2019, 01:45 PM   #11
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhead View Post
It probably could be done, but it would all be experimental data and probably very sensitive to minor variations in powder charge or bullet depth.
Risks outweighing rewards.
It can be done. Any load can be adjusted for seating depth. We do that all the time - every time we change bullets. And a small powder chamber is not a problem as long as the load is adjusted, after all, even very heavy bullets can be loaded in the 9mm. There's factory ammo with 158 and 165 grain bullets, and one can load your own heavy bullets too.

https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2018/...-need-to-know/

And you could contact the powder companies and ask for their advice. They're very helpful.
74A95 is offline  
Old April 3, 2019, 05:14 PM   #12
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
Thanks, might look that up.
I only have a hundred SWCs, and the cones are doing what I want, so for now I'm going to experiment further with the cones.
Right now I'm contemplating a small batch with the bullets seated out long enough to headspace on the bullet instead of the rim like they do with some target .45 auto loads.
Hammerhead is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05422 seconds with 9 queries