The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 13, 2016, 10:36 AM   #1
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,994
Keymod v. MOE system

This is an updated request to similar thread I have started before.

I haven't seen any convincing argument one is better than the other and I'm not entirely convinced either actually has anything on a picatinny quad rail once you start attaching things. Nothing on a normal handguard if you don't need a mini-toaster hanging off the handguard.

The market seems to say they do though, so...
I seem to see a lot more keymod rifles for sale than MOE
What do you expect as far as longevity of these systems?
Do you think there is any real benefit to one over the other?
Are there deficiencies such that a third system is likely?
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old November 13, 2016, 01:02 PM   #2
Venom1956
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,656
You mean M-lok? Theres Keymod then Magpul has M-lok and MOE that are slightly different. I would say eventually M-lok will have more of the market simply because magpul is the go to for most AR makers furniture.

The QD M-lok mounts are really cool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x27g4TNuvnM
If that becomes the norm for magpul I can definitely see m-lok coming out on top.
Venom1956 is offline  
Old November 13, 2016, 01:14 PM   #3
Theohazard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
I'm guessing the OP meant M-Lok. The MOE mounting system is Magpul's old proprietary system that they got rid of and replaced with their improved open-source M-Lok system.

As someone who sells and uses both on a daily basis, I can tell you that M-Lok is superior to Keymod. M-Lok attaches more securely and is less likely to come loose. Also, M-Lok has the added advantage of being reversable, whereas Keymod only attaches one way.
Theohazard is offline  
Old November 14, 2016, 09:36 AM   #4
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,994
https://www.magpul.com/products/moe-...length-ar15-m4

I guess they just have a few of those left in stock. I couldn't remember the current magpul system and that popped up on google. Didn't realize they hadn't sold off the old stock from the obsolete system yet.

Magpul seems to be the goto mid-grade supplier. I like their products and a definite step up from the budget brands, but I like some other companies products more.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old November 14, 2016, 12:57 PM   #5
Theohazard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwilliamson062
https://www.magpul.com/products/moe-...length-ar15-m4

I guess they just have a few of those left in stock. I couldn't remember the current magpul system and that popped up on google. Didn't realize they hadn't sold off the old stock from the obsolete system yet.
No, that's not the old obsolete system you're linking to, that's the new M-Lok system.

It looks like you're a little confused here. Notice the description of the handguard in that link says "MOE M-Lok". "MOE" stands for "Magpul Original Equipment" and it used to describe the old products with their old proprietary mounting system. Then they got rid of that system and came up with the open-source M-Lok system that is designed to dethrone Keymod (and it's currently doing a good job of that since it's a better system than Keymod). They kept the MOE name on many of their products but now those products are all redesigned to work with the new M-Lok mounting system.

So using the term "MOE" to describe the mounting system refers the old obsolete proprietary system. Yes, Magpul still uses the MOE name, but notice that all their MOE products now use the new M-Lok mounting system, like the handguard you linked to above.

This picture might help. The handguard on top uses the old proprietary MOE mounting system; the one on the bottom uses the new M-Lok mounting system just like the one you linked to above. Notice how the M-Lok slots are bigger and more rectangular.


Last edited by Theohazard; November 14, 2016 at 01:09 PM.
Theohazard is offline  
Old November 14, 2016, 08:56 PM   #6
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,994
Ok, so the MOE M-LOK.

And the general consensus is M-LOK is going to win out?
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old November 14, 2016, 09:03 PM   #7
Theohazard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
I think so, it's a better system. Also, many of the companies that used to only offer rifles with Keymod rails now offer M-Lok too, like Daniel Defense and Knights.

It's possible there's enough market space for both to coexist for a while longer, but if one is going to win I think it will be M-Lok.
Theohazard is offline  
Old November 16, 2016, 11:43 AM   #8
Independent George
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2013
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwilliamson062 View Post

I haven't seen any convincing argument one is better than the other and I'm not entirely convinced either actually has anything on a picatinny quad rail once you start attaching things. Nothing on a normal handguard if you don't need a mini-toaster hanging off the handguard.
I am an agnostic on Keymod vs Mlok, but I disagree with you on quad rails. I think both systems are vast improvements on quad rails:

1. They're lighter.
2. They're more comfortable to grip
3. Depending on the model, you're not necessarily limited to mounting at 90 degrees.

I know all the arguments back and forth on Keymod vs Mlok, but from what I've seen there just don't seem to be much functional difference. Both systems are intuitive and effective, and most people are using 3 or 5 slot picatinny sections underneath to mount their hardware anyway.
Independent George is offline  
Old December 1, 2016, 09:10 AM   #9
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Depending on what the OP was actually referring to, one diff is whether the HG has to be removed for mounting the accessory or not.
I'm still using the MagPul HG's that require removal and it's a PITA cause usually I have to pull the scope to remove the top half.
Mobuck is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10104 seconds with 9 queries