![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Results of AR15 case life test using LC Brass
CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond or not covered by currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.
Over the past 2 years I have been running a test to determine the case life for LC brass fired in Ar15 rifles. I wanted to know when and how the cases would fail. This isn't an endorsement to load brass beyond what you normally do. It was for my benefit, but I wanted to share the results. Bottom line, 19 of the 20 cases involved in the test failed due to cracks/splits developing in the root of the gouges created when the fired case was being extracted and contacted the locking lugs on the barrel extension. My case life results for the 20 cases involved in the test:
I was using once fired brass picked up at the range. My load was 26.0 gr of WC 844 with a 55 gr. FMJ bullet providing a velocity of 3050 fps in a 18" barrel. QL predicts the peak pressure would run about 53K PSI. None of the brass showed any signs of primer pocket enlargement, none of the brass had any thinning above the head (indicating potential case head separation). I set the shoulder back ~0.003" each sizing. I annealed case necks each 5'th firing. I took pictures of the case necks as they failed. As I saw the trend of what was causing the failure, I made minor modifications to my AR15's which has eliminated 95% of the gouges. I am including pictures of the gouges where the failures occurred (what doesn't look like much to the naked eye looks pretty dramatic when magnified) and the sharp corner on a typical barrel extension that caused the gouges. ![]() ![]()
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life member |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 4,039
|
That is pretty darn interesting. Thanks for sharing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
Thanks for sharing you results. Always wondered about actual case life. Theres alot of fluff thrown around about it. Nice to see an actual test.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: April 4, 2016
Posts: 87
|
Great work. Exactly what did you relive from your barrel extension?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,722
|
Interesting how well that lasted. Thanks for the test effort.
Quote:
Since it's over the equivalent published load, I put the required warning into your post for you.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2014
Posts: 179
|
That's pretty good case life.
I'm curious how long it would take to fail without annealing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 23, 2016
Posts: 85
|
In don't anneal, and I get 5 - 8 reloads I would guess before neck splits occur. Given that the brass I get is mostly free but decent quality range brass (same brands and headstamps from same session), or if using brass from my large quantity of new bulk LC or commercial brass acquired years ago, what I do is economical enough for me.
These are very interesting test results and thanks for sharing them. Last edited by MosinM39; October 15, 2016 at 02:52 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
That is interesting. Makes the conventional wisdom of "4 reloads and chuck it" seem very conservative.
Jimro |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,757
|
Great photos, info ty.
Brand of dies used? Brass life has always been cut short for me using an old RCBS FL die. The necks fail. Trying a new RCBS now. Over working the neck area seems to be the main problem. Bushing dies would be better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
My bad for not putting the load disclaimer in the post, thanks Unclenick!
I used a standard FL Redding resizing die with a carbide expander. I do lube the outside and inside of the case necks. As I mentioned, I was only setting the shoulder back 0.003" per firing. The neck OD after firing was 0.254" and after sizing and expanding was 0.244", so it was seeing 0.010" expansion. My die only undersizes the neck about 0.001". That is why I did anneal every 5'th cycle. But clearly the amount of expansion during firing was too much for the thin brass in the root of the gouges and thus the failures. As soon as I could see any light through the case neck, I retired it. Some were barely visible.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life member |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life member |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,362
|
Thanks for sharing. Good test data is rare.
FWIW, I do that mod to all of my ARs, knocking off the sharp edges of the barrel extensions, but I leave the ejector and extractor and full power. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 319
|
Very interesting post Jepp2.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2016
Posts: 802
|
Very helpful.
Just wanted to note that is a very small sample size out of single population. I have always felt comfortable with ten and then pitch. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|