The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 25, 2014, 11:11 AM   #1
FoghornLeghorn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 1,000
Which Pythons to stay away from?

I'm giving my son my six inch barrelled Python as a gift. That means I'm in the market for another Python with a six inch barrel.

I bought mine years ago, but remember that there was a period when Colt's quality control slipped on revolvers. In 1989 I bought a new single action Colt that was really sorry. In fact, the mainspring broke after only cocking it a few times.

Was there such a period with the Python that was inferior? Is there some way to know the serial number range? I plan to go to the Wannamacher show in a few weeks to shop, and want to be prepared before I drop $2,000 or more for a revolver.
FoghornLeghorn is offline  
Old March 25, 2014, 04:11 PM   #2
P5 Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,804
Which Pythons to Avoid?

The ones let lose in the Everglades?

I've never been a fan of the Colt Snakes myself. I've had a couple and never warmed to them.
I'd like a nice early Detective, though.
P5 Guy is offline  
Old March 25, 2014, 07:38 PM   #3
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,562
Guns are not bottles of wine. There are no "good years" or "bad years" there are just good or bad guns.
Guns made during the Colt strike of the mid-1980's are the most likely to see something not right, but even then, most of them were fine quality.

The way to buy a Python is to LOOK at them. If it seems to look good and is in proper timing, it usually IS good.
Buying a gun based on just the year made will cause you to miss a good one or buy a bad one.

The main thing to watch out for today are Pythons that have been "helped".
That means re-finished guns being sold as like new-original.
Also beware of counterfeit boxes, manuals, papers, test targets, and even fake hang tags.
You have to know what to look for to ID fake boxes, but these days it's gotten so bad any Python "in the box" should be assumed to be a fake box unless proven otherwise.

So, if you see a Python that's in your price range and looks like it's a good one, if probably is and will almost always be a good shooter.
If you're shopping for a collectible that's like new in the box, be very careful, the fakers are out in force.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 10:14 AM   #4
Don P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,213
Colt employee's went on strike in 1985 and the strike lasted 5 years. They were part of the UAW. This is the period when QC went down hill in Colts production as non skilled workers were assembling firearms. My personal opinion is not owning anything that came out of Colt from 1985 and later.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer,
ICORE Range Officer,
,MAG 40 Graduate
As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be.
Don P is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 10:25 AM   #5
FoghornLeghorn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
My personal opinion is not owning anything that came out of Colt from 1985 and later
Would you happen to know the serial number range?
FoghornLeghorn is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 10:40 AM   #6
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
.

RE: Colt Python dates:

SN T27541 was 1984

SN T34453 was 1985

IDK whether those SN's were the 1st-made or the last-made, of their respective years.



.
PetahW is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 12:48 PM   #7
Don P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,213
Link here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Python#History
and the serial numbers, http://proofhouse.com/colt/pyth.htm
and here, http://www.colt.com/CustomerServices...berLookup.aspx
and here, http://www.coltforum.com/forums/colt...al-ranges.html
and here, http://www.colt.com/ShopOnline/tabid...2/Default.aspx

The pocket guide is thru 1998
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer,
ICORE Range Officer,
,MAG 40 Graduate
As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be.
Don P is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 01:18 PM   #8
FoghornLeghorn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 1,000
Thanks so much for all the information.
FoghornLeghorn is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 07:34 PM   #9
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,562
I own two stainless Pythons, both made during the strike.

The 4 inch is superb quality and is extremely accurate. Timing, alignment and all mechanical and appearance items were dead on right out of the box.

The 6 inch is not only superb quality, it's very possibly the most accurate Python I ever fired of the MANY MANY I worked on over the years. (All pistols were test fired for accuracy and function off sand bags after servicing).

Had I passed on them due to the years made, I would have missed out on some of the best Colt's I ever saw in all those years.
On the other hand I've seen Pythons made during the late 1950's that were messes.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 09:05 PM   #10
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,149
DFarriswheel -- Are you saying that the bosses actually knew something about making guns?
KyJim is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10255 seconds with 9 queries